In reply to the comments by the reviewer, I see you used the phrase "something we can submitt with approval". I call your attention to WP:COI. To give an acceptable article,
I am not reviewing it formally, because if I did, I would find it necessary to send it for deletion as advertising ,there's a good deal that needs omission, such as all of his lectures, and all adjectives and phrases of praise, and all quotations of his own talks and writings. Then rewrite the article to show, not what he wants to say about himself, but what someone in the general public might want to know.
(btw, I moved the page to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clifford S. Pukel as we do not use the MD in titles. ) DGG ( talk ) 23:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
The article William Mitchell Banks has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
Referencing for beginners, or ask at the
help desk. Once you have provided at least one
reliable source, you may remove the {{
prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.
Comatmebro
~Come at me~
23:30, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Draft:Clifford S. Pukel with
this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
00:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Bnatelle. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Clifford S. Pukel".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 17:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
In reply to the comments by the reviewer, I see you used the phrase "something we can submitt with approval". I call your attention to WP:COI. To give an acceptable article,
I am not reviewing it formally, because if I did, I would find it necessary to send it for deletion as advertising ,there's a good deal that needs omission, such as all of his lectures, and all adjectives and phrases of praise, and all quotations of his own talks and writings. Then rewrite the article to show, not what he wants to say about himself, but what someone in the general public might want to know.
(btw, I moved the page to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clifford S. Pukel as we do not use the MD in titles. ) DGG ( talk ) 23:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
The article William Mitchell Banks has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
Referencing for beginners, or ask at the
help desk. Once you have provided at least one
reliable source, you may remove the {{
prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.
Comatmebro
~Come at me~
23:30, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Draft:Clifford S. Pukel with
this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
00:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Bnatelle. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Clifford S. Pukel".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 17:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)