|
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Sue Bell Cobb. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The editor whose username is Z0 19:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I'm a new user and am experiencing an extreme case of vandalism from ip users to the BLP article Sue Bell Cobb. Today this seems to be limited to user 144.163.39.142( talk) but given the number of reversions, tone of user edit summaries (when provided), and duplicated reversions from multiple IP's over the past several days, I suspect some sock puppetry as well, but can't prove that. I'ver stated numerous times in edit summaries the reasons for my original edit, but they don't appear to have satisfied any of the vandals. These are: "content purpose, value, and context is unclear and confusing. Content placement is confusing and disjointed, lacking clear or seamless flow into present text. Doesn’t add anything to BLP." Appreciate any assistance towards properly handling this situation. Blindleee ( talk) 20:16, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
|
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Sue Bell Cobb. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The editor whose username is Z0 19:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I'm a new user and am experiencing an extreme case of vandalism from ip users to the BLP article Sue Bell Cobb. Today this seems to be limited to user 144.163.39.142( talk) but given the number of reversions, tone of user edit summaries (when provided), and duplicated reversions from multiple IP's over the past several days, I suspect some sock puppetry as well, but can't prove that. I'ver stated numerous times in edit summaries the reasons for my original edit, but they don't appear to have satisfied any of the vandals. These are: "content purpose, value, and context is unclear and confusing. Content placement is confusing and disjointed, lacking clear or seamless flow into present text. Doesn’t add anything to BLP." Appreciate any assistance towards properly handling this situation. Blindleee ( talk) 20:16, 5 June 2018 (UTC)