|
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Magnolia677 ( talk) 00:37, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Please don't follow other users around solely with the intent to annoy them. It's annoying, unhelpful, and violates policy. So please consider this a friendly warning. Neutrality talk 04:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
I see that you simply reverted my good-faith compromise effort; therefore I have reverted your BOLD changes to the article and request that you discuss your proposed edits to Sarsour's biography on the article talk page, so that the changes can be examined and an editorial consensus can form without edit-warring. Thank you NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 06:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Linda Sarsour. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 23:04, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
On March 10, I gave you the following caution: "Please don't follow other users around solely with the intent to annoy them. It's annoying, unhelpful, and violates policy. So please consider this a friendly warning."
Then, today, you made
this edit today, linking to off-wiki websites (which, in your own words, "flame" a user), in can only be seen as
harassment of an individual editor. (I consider it a
personal attack as well).
I would be justified,
under policy, in imposing a block for this kind of behavior. But I don't want to do that if I can avoid it. Instead, I want you to promptly (1) acknowledge that your recent comment on that article talk page violated our policy and (2) commit to not doing something similar again. Will you do so? Thank you.
Neutrality
talk
23:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Hello, Blagamaga. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Magnolia677 ( talk) 00:37, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Please don't follow other users around solely with the intent to annoy them. It's annoying, unhelpful, and violates policy. So please consider this a friendly warning. Neutrality talk 04:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
I see that you simply reverted my good-faith compromise effort; therefore I have reverted your BOLD changes to the article and request that you discuss your proposed edits to Sarsour's biography on the article talk page, so that the changes can be examined and an editorial consensus can form without edit-warring. Thank you NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 06:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Linda Sarsour. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 23:04, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
On March 10, I gave you the following caution: "Please don't follow other users around solely with the intent to annoy them. It's annoying, unhelpful, and violates policy. So please consider this a friendly warning."
Then, today, you made
this edit today, linking to off-wiki websites (which, in your own words, "flame" a user), in can only be seen as
harassment of an individual editor. (I consider it a
personal attack as well).
I would be justified,
under policy, in imposing a block for this kind of behavior. But I don't want to do that if I can avoid it. Instead, I want you to promptly (1) acknowledge that your recent comment on that article talk page violated our policy and (2) commit to not doing something similar again. Will you do so? Thank you.
Neutrality
talk
23:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Hello, Blagamaga. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)