![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Please try to
assume good faith while interacting with other editors, such as the talk page for
List of Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated episodes. I know changes, especially repeated ones, from inexperienced editors can be frustrating but please try to put yourself in their shoes. Guiding these editors to editing in a more appropriate way will have far better results than lashing out at them. When reverting their changes, take a moment to leave a note on their talk page explaining why. If they've not been welcomed yet, consider adding a
welcome template.
RadioFan (
talk)
14:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
You've made some good contributions to the List of Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated episodes article however it remains without any references. Can you help improve it there as well?-- RadioFan ( talk) 20:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
I do not feel that a complete reversion of my edit was appropriate.
I got your message. It is a detailed comment that starts "I hope you’re doing well. There’s something I wanted to ask you, concerning Names of large numbers. Your last edit to the aide-memoire section, where you "simplified the mathematics" wasn’t really necessary in my opinion. We never simplify math on Wikipedia; maybe they do on the Simple English Wikipedia, but not here." I have not yet reviewed what you have posted since it is lengthy, but let me react to just the introductory paragraph that I just quoted:
Are you saying that the only edits that should be made are the ones that are really necessary? This view makes no sense to me. Do you mean that the resulting paragraph is worse? Or only the same?
Who is "we". You say "Never". Never simplify? I read this to mean that my motivation in changing the "aide memoire" paragraph, at least as expressed in the "change summary", is suspect. This also makes no sense to me.
On the previous edit, you posted that you restored my edits that you reverted, but I found that what you added to the paragraph was a sentence that said something about a comma or space goes after every three digits. This did not fairly represent the text I posted, although I am sure you feel that it did, assuming your good faith. Therefore, I hope you can understand that I prefer that you find another person to discuss your ideas with. I do not feel that you and I can productively combine to edit this paragraph, because of our differing assumptions. Certainly you must be able to find someone closer to your views to work with on this. Best of luck! ( Martin | talk • contribs 13:31, 25 March 2011 (UTC))
Yes I agree with you. We are not able to communicate with each other well. While I do think it would be good for a few people to collaborate on the change, I feel I am not that other person. ( Martin | talk • contribs 18:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC))
Someone deleted the accurate information of the upcoming episodes, episodes that premiered up here and Canada. You have obviously been frustrated by the constant fake Moon light and Which With is Which vandalisms, I can assure you these are NOT the episodes. Episode 15 is called "The Wild Brood" and has monster bikers in it. I know of it because I originally saw the information on this site and later found the episode while watching Teletoon up here in Canada. I eventually found a torrent for it as well and the episodes listed along with it "Escape from Mystery Manor" were also real as well. They all premiered here in Canada only. I cannot find the information in any of the previous edit pages in the history but I know it's real, I watched it and I can give you a link to a torrent of "The Wild Brood" as well as show you the page at TV Tropes that is LOADED with references to this episode and others that have been shown. They are real and someone replaced them with fakes at some point. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/RMul ( talk) 02:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Also, here is the more accurate information in full as it originally appeared before it was replaced, it can be found near the bottom of this page: http://www.toonzone.net/forums/showthread.php?t=229197&page=42
Regarding your (undo) edit "Undid revision 425150029 by 123.243.217.67 Sorry, but that's not a viable reference -- it's simply redirecting further down in the article...": the reference led to the discussion page of the article, not to the article itself. If that was the misunderstanding, could you please undo your edit; if this is not the reason for your edit, could you please explain further? Thanks, 123.243.217.67 ( talk) 02:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
I requested page protection for Because You Left, so hopefully that helps stop the vandalism. And I'm also not quite sure how I got mixed up in this (I just reviewed the article for GA and forgot to remove it from my watchlist). :) Ruby2010 comment! 19:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
A lot of people on Amazon.com are under the assumption that Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated is 2 seasons long each series being 13 episodes long because of Cartoon Network. The online game even advertises episodes 14-26 as season two. http://www.cartoonnetwork.com/games/scoobydoomysteryinc/crystalcove/index.html (look at the badges.) What should be done? JamesAlan1986 ( talk) 16:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Contrary to your claim that "There are many more Virtual Console games listed in the article", there is none. Therefore, just having those two will look out of place. Also, given the large number of Mario VC releases and that, unlike the Super Mario Advance series and the NES Classics, they are simply ports, it will lead to over-saturation to list every time the game was re-released unchanged. -- ThomasO1989 ( talk) 16:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
I can not find where the information for the section "Ratings (in millions)" is found in the article " List of Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated episodes". It is not online the way I see it. Therefore it possibly could not be a reliable. Do you possibly know where this information is found? For all the episodes 15 and up there is no information for it. The information is the "Ratings (in millions)" section be deleted if there is no source. -- User: Furtie fert ferts
I wanted to let you know I did post on the Talk:List of Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated episodes that we both have discussed and agreed that the List of Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated episodes page is getting too revealing and that because of this I removed certain revealing aspects of the show and slimmed it down to the more important stuff that needs to be posted in the "Overarching Mystery Clue(s)" section. I hope it is okay that I did that. JamesAlan1986 ( talk) 06:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
JamesAlan1986 ( talk) 13:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
I would, but you seem to know what's going on there a bit better than me -- just got to
WP:RFPP, edit the first section (
WP:RFPP#Requests for protection and place your request at the TOP of that section. EDIT: Taken care of. Problem is, you posted your request at the top of the
Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated article; actually, you're supposed to literally post it on the
WP:RFPP page itself -- just scroll to the first section
WP:RFPP#Requests for protection and post there (at the TOP of the section). Sorry if that was a bit harsh...
Black Yoshi (
Yoshi! |
Yoshi's Eggs)
22:29, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Please try to
assume good faith while interacting with other editors, such as the talk page for
List of Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated episodes. I know changes, especially repeated ones, from inexperienced editors can be frustrating but please try to put yourself in their shoes. Guiding these editors to editing in a more appropriate way will have far better results than lashing out at them. When reverting their changes, take a moment to leave a note on their talk page explaining why. If they've not been welcomed yet, consider adding a
welcome template.
RadioFan (
talk)
14:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
You've made some good contributions to the List of Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated episodes article however it remains without any references. Can you help improve it there as well?-- RadioFan ( talk) 20:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
I do not feel that a complete reversion of my edit was appropriate.
I got your message. It is a detailed comment that starts "I hope you’re doing well. There’s something I wanted to ask you, concerning Names of large numbers. Your last edit to the aide-memoire section, where you "simplified the mathematics" wasn’t really necessary in my opinion. We never simplify math on Wikipedia; maybe they do on the Simple English Wikipedia, but not here." I have not yet reviewed what you have posted since it is lengthy, but let me react to just the introductory paragraph that I just quoted:
Are you saying that the only edits that should be made are the ones that are really necessary? This view makes no sense to me. Do you mean that the resulting paragraph is worse? Or only the same?
Who is "we". You say "Never". Never simplify? I read this to mean that my motivation in changing the "aide memoire" paragraph, at least as expressed in the "change summary", is suspect. This also makes no sense to me.
On the previous edit, you posted that you restored my edits that you reverted, but I found that what you added to the paragraph was a sentence that said something about a comma or space goes after every three digits. This did not fairly represent the text I posted, although I am sure you feel that it did, assuming your good faith. Therefore, I hope you can understand that I prefer that you find another person to discuss your ideas with. I do not feel that you and I can productively combine to edit this paragraph, because of our differing assumptions. Certainly you must be able to find someone closer to your views to work with on this. Best of luck! ( Martin | talk • contribs 13:31, 25 March 2011 (UTC))
Yes I agree with you. We are not able to communicate with each other well. While I do think it would be good for a few people to collaborate on the change, I feel I am not that other person. ( Martin | talk • contribs 18:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC))
Someone deleted the accurate information of the upcoming episodes, episodes that premiered up here and Canada. You have obviously been frustrated by the constant fake Moon light and Which With is Which vandalisms, I can assure you these are NOT the episodes. Episode 15 is called "The Wild Brood" and has monster bikers in it. I know of it because I originally saw the information on this site and later found the episode while watching Teletoon up here in Canada. I eventually found a torrent for it as well and the episodes listed along with it "Escape from Mystery Manor" were also real as well. They all premiered here in Canada only. I cannot find the information in any of the previous edit pages in the history but I know it's real, I watched it and I can give you a link to a torrent of "The Wild Brood" as well as show you the page at TV Tropes that is LOADED with references to this episode and others that have been shown. They are real and someone replaced them with fakes at some point. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/RMul ( talk) 02:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Also, here is the more accurate information in full as it originally appeared before it was replaced, it can be found near the bottom of this page: http://www.toonzone.net/forums/showthread.php?t=229197&page=42
Regarding your (undo) edit "Undid revision 425150029 by 123.243.217.67 Sorry, but that's not a viable reference -- it's simply redirecting further down in the article...": the reference led to the discussion page of the article, not to the article itself. If that was the misunderstanding, could you please undo your edit; if this is not the reason for your edit, could you please explain further? Thanks, 123.243.217.67 ( talk) 02:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
I requested page protection for Because You Left, so hopefully that helps stop the vandalism. And I'm also not quite sure how I got mixed up in this (I just reviewed the article for GA and forgot to remove it from my watchlist). :) Ruby2010 comment! 19:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
A lot of people on Amazon.com are under the assumption that Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated is 2 seasons long each series being 13 episodes long because of Cartoon Network. The online game even advertises episodes 14-26 as season two. http://www.cartoonnetwork.com/games/scoobydoomysteryinc/crystalcove/index.html (look at the badges.) What should be done? JamesAlan1986 ( talk) 16:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Contrary to your claim that "There are many more Virtual Console games listed in the article", there is none. Therefore, just having those two will look out of place. Also, given the large number of Mario VC releases and that, unlike the Super Mario Advance series and the NES Classics, they are simply ports, it will lead to over-saturation to list every time the game was re-released unchanged. -- ThomasO1989 ( talk) 16:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
I can not find where the information for the section "Ratings (in millions)" is found in the article " List of Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated episodes". It is not online the way I see it. Therefore it possibly could not be a reliable. Do you possibly know where this information is found? For all the episodes 15 and up there is no information for it. The information is the "Ratings (in millions)" section be deleted if there is no source. -- User: Furtie fert ferts
I wanted to let you know I did post on the Talk:List of Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated episodes that we both have discussed and agreed that the List of Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated episodes page is getting too revealing and that because of this I removed certain revealing aspects of the show and slimmed it down to the more important stuff that needs to be posted in the "Overarching Mystery Clue(s)" section. I hope it is okay that I did that. JamesAlan1986 ( talk) 06:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
JamesAlan1986 ( talk) 13:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
I would, but you seem to know what's going on there a bit better than me -- just got to
WP:RFPP, edit the first section (
WP:RFPP#Requests for protection and place your request at the TOP of that section. EDIT: Taken care of. Problem is, you posted your request at the top of the
Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated article; actually, you're supposed to literally post it on the
WP:RFPP page itself -- just scroll to the first section
WP:RFPP#Requests for protection and post there (at the TOP of the section). Sorry if that was a bit harsh...
Black Yoshi (
Yoshi! |
Yoshi's Eggs)
22:29, 13 June 2011 (UTC)