![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 83 | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | → | Archive 90 |
The one in Devon has a different name, Whympston, Wimpstone appears to be former alternative name, wouldn't the redirect (with the hatnote) work better than the DAB page with only 2 items. As it was until 5 months ago. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 17:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
What definition of "modern-day" do you use in this edit? Nyttend ( talk) 00:03, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your note, but I don't quite understand on 1980s in music and Music history of the United States in the 1980s I changed the link from Unconditional love_(disambiguation) to Unconditional Love (Donna Summer song) & the others similarlarly unless something has gone wrong with the DisamAssist software. I will investigate.— Rod talk 19:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Why did you revert this edit? -- Iiii I I I ( talk) 22:34, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
You're piling up the cases in there like a night court backlog. Nice work! Randy Kryn ( talk) 14:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi! I notice as an admin you have been deleting my edits about periodicity. Could you please explain your decision? What could I potentially do differently to gain credibility? I am intent on following guidelines. I am also intent on adding relevant and correct information about periodicity to that page (yes I accidentally conflated periodicity with wavelength, that would be fixed). My research area is in signal processing/recognition, digital additive synthesis, and mathematical music theory. Periodicity is huge here. Thanks for the help,
RB — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.60.34.63 ( talk) 09:24, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Bkonrad, I'm curious about why you are removing {{refer}} templates in disambiguation pages. I have been using Dabfix which adds the template, and if that's wrong, I'd like to understand why. Thanks, Leschnei ( talk) 22:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit to Christmas (disambiguation), but i was worried about breaking links to Christmas (disambiguation)#People with the given name and Christmas (disambiguation)#Fictional, plus i suspect these sections should have more entries, even if i can't think of any right now.
If we're not worried about breaking links to subsections, what do you think about changing the "Other uses" subsection header to "People named Christmas"?
-- 71.121.143.120 ( talk) 20:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Why did you restore a contentious revision to Amazon when there is no consensus about it?
I voluntarily backed out of shaping the disambiguation page to closer match what I'm arguing for. I replaced it with a neutral state that doesn't conform to either side's preferred version but is nonetheless functional and unsurprising by its antiseptic and impartial presentation. You respond by restoring another editor's preferred version despite the fact that (a) the discussion isn't resolved in favor of that version, and (b) you don't even weigh in on the discussion with any argument (just appealing vaguely to "guidelines").
That's more than a little distasteful. Please voluntarily back out these changes to revert to the neutral form. -- C. A. Russell ( talk) 17:57, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
t's a complicated situation where the plural has a Primary topic and the singular doesn't, but I'd say that the river, the tribe and the company should all three appear at the top of the page as the major uses.Can you honestly say that supports your position?
It seems that the main meanings, worth highlighting in the lead, are the company, the river, the people and perhaps the rainforest.Again, can you honestly say that supports your position. Both of them, as well as User:Fyrael and User:Xezbeth support organization that is explicitly at odds with both your preferred edit as well as your purportedly "neutral" edit. older ≠ wiser 19:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 83 | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | → | Archive 90 |
The one in Devon has a different name, Whympston, Wimpstone appears to be former alternative name, wouldn't the redirect (with the hatnote) work better than the DAB page with only 2 items. As it was until 5 months ago. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 17:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
What definition of "modern-day" do you use in this edit? Nyttend ( talk) 00:03, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your note, but I don't quite understand on 1980s in music and Music history of the United States in the 1980s I changed the link from Unconditional love_(disambiguation) to Unconditional Love (Donna Summer song) & the others similarlarly unless something has gone wrong with the DisamAssist software. I will investigate.— Rod talk 19:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Why did you revert this edit? -- Iiii I I I ( talk) 22:34, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
You're piling up the cases in there like a night court backlog. Nice work! Randy Kryn ( talk) 14:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi! I notice as an admin you have been deleting my edits about periodicity. Could you please explain your decision? What could I potentially do differently to gain credibility? I am intent on following guidelines. I am also intent on adding relevant and correct information about periodicity to that page (yes I accidentally conflated periodicity with wavelength, that would be fixed). My research area is in signal processing/recognition, digital additive synthesis, and mathematical music theory. Periodicity is huge here. Thanks for the help,
RB — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.60.34.63 ( talk) 09:24, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Bkonrad, I'm curious about why you are removing {{refer}} templates in disambiguation pages. I have been using Dabfix which adds the template, and if that's wrong, I'd like to understand why. Thanks, Leschnei ( talk) 22:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit to Christmas (disambiguation), but i was worried about breaking links to Christmas (disambiguation)#People with the given name and Christmas (disambiguation)#Fictional, plus i suspect these sections should have more entries, even if i can't think of any right now.
If we're not worried about breaking links to subsections, what do you think about changing the "Other uses" subsection header to "People named Christmas"?
-- 71.121.143.120 ( talk) 20:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Why did you restore a contentious revision to Amazon when there is no consensus about it?
I voluntarily backed out of shaping the disambiguation page to closer match what I'm arguing for. I replaced it with a neutral state that doesn't conform to either side's preferred version but is nonetheless functional and unsurprising by its antiseptic and impartial presentation. You respond by restoring another editor's preferred version despite the fact that (a) the discussion isn't resolved in favor of that version, and (b) you don't even weigh in on the discussion with any argument (just appealing vaguely to "guidelines").
That's more than a little distasteful. Please voluntarily back out these changes to revert to the neutral form. -- C. A. Russell ( talk) 17:57, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
t's a complicated situation where the plural has a Primary topic and the singular doesn't, but I'd say that the river, the tribe and the company should all three appear at the top of the page as the major uses.Can you honestly say that supports your position?
It seems that the main meanings, worth highlighting in the lead, are the company, the river, the people and perhaps the rainforest.Again, can you honestly say that supports your position. Both of them, as well as User:Fyrael and User:Xezbeth support organization that is explicitly at odds with both your preferred edit as well as your purportedly "neutral" edit. older ≠ wiser 19:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)