As I said earlier, this UCI document is a good find, so thank you, and I've invited people on the talk page to consider whether this data from UCI can be considered authoritative given that the Tour is outwith their control, being an ASO event, and the Tour page still includes Kohl as KoM winner and 3rd overall. However, let's wait and see what others have to say about that, and not edit the article until it can be done more decisively and then do it more neatly. Kevin McE ( talk) 20:20, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I have a question for you: how did you get to that page? ( this one) If I go to www.uci.infostradasports.com, it seems like I have to log in. I thought that the page of UCI was at www.uci.ch, so what kind of page is this? -- EdgeNavidad ( talk) 06:46, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to José Ramón Muro, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 ( talk) 03:16, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
As I said earlier, this UCI document is a good find, so thank you, and I've invited people on the talk page to consider whether this data from UCI can be considered authoritative given that the Tour is outwith their control, being an ASO event, and the Tour page still includes Kohl as KoM winner and 3rd overall. However, let's wait and see what others have to say about that, and not edit the article until it can be done more decisively and then do it more neatly. Kevin McE ( talk) 20:20, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I have a question for you: how did you get to that page? ( this one) If I go to www.uci.infostradasports.com, it seems like I have to log in. I thought that the page of UCI was at www.uci.ch, so what kind of page is this? -- EdgeNavidad ( talk) 06:46, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to José Ramón Muro, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 ( talk) 03:16, 31 December 2014 (UTC)