This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for
soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at
Canadian Nationalist Party, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Toa
Nidhiki05
19:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Please abstain from threatening others for simply editing pages. We are all here to keep the articles accurate and legitimate, and if you have any problem with this at all, Wikipedia may not be for you.
Thanks, Bio
I never removed any paragraphs, this is a blatant misrepresentation of my edits. I simply removed terms such as "White Nationalist" which inaccurately paint the party in a negative light. Not every member is white, and the party openly advocates for the empowerment of the Aboriginal Peoples of Canada ( https://nationalist.ca/2018/08/17/frank-godon-speaks-indian-act/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oc9mvMFTB4 ), so White Nationalist can't possibly apply with any degree of accuracy. I also removed sources that refer to the party as "White Nationalist" as this is clearly a mislabel and incorrect, thus rendering such citations as partially illegitimate on account of their erroneous description.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Canadian Nationalist Party. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ToeFungii ( talk) 21:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Canadian Nationalist Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Three users have reverted your edits and you might technically be in
WP:3RR. There is extensive conversations on the article talk page regarding what you are trying to change. That's where you should go for additional discussion before making any further changes. TY
ToeFungii (
talk)
21:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for
soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at
Canadian Nationalist Party, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Toa
Nidhiki05
19:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Please abstain from threatening others for simply editing pages. We are all here to keep the articles accurate and legitimate, and if you have any problem with this at all, Wikipedia may not be for you.
Thanks, Bio
I never removed any paragraphs, this is a blatant misrepresentation of my edits. I simply removed terms such as "White Nationalist" which inaccurately paint the party in a negative light. Not every member is white, and the party openly advocates for the empowerment of the Aboriginal Peoples of Canada ( https://nationalist.ca/2018/08/17/frank-godon-speaks-indian-act/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oc9mvMFTB4 ), so White Nationalist can't possibly apply with any degree of accuracy. I also removed sources that refer to the party as "White Nationalist" as this is clearly a mislabel and incorrect, thus rendering such citations as partially illegitimate on account of their erroneous description.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Canadian Nationalist Party. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ToeFungii ( talk) 21:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Canadian Nationalist Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Three users have reverted your edits and you might technically be in
WP:3RR. There is extensive conversations on the article talk page regarding what you are trying to change. That's where you should go for additional discussion before making any further changes. TY
ToeFungii (
talk)
21:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)