|
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Peace education, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Hrafn Talk Stalk( P) 08:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
In response to your "Still not sure why deleted" -- my reason was contained in my edit summary: "Rvt: MASSIVELY WP:COI edit, as well as removing a number of fact-tags without providing a ref & introducing unsourced material".
Now please stop:
Please read WP:COI. Hrafn Talk Stalk( P) 11:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
...I cannot find anything that you have added that wasn't either cited to yourself (as either Bill Robb or W. Robb) or uncited. In addition to WP:COI, please read WP:V & WP:NOR (particularly WP:NOR#Citing oneself). Hrafn Talk Stalk( P) 11:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hrafn Talk Stalk( P) 12:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.
This guideline STRONGLY discourages you to make edits where you cite your own work, add links to things you are affiliated with, etc. etc. You are close to a 3RR (which is also true for Hrafn), but I do agree with his edits. I will strongly advice you to discuss the edits on the talkpage, and NOT to make them yourself. Referencing to own work is not strange in academics, but referencing only to your own work is frowned upon, as it is here. Your edits are quite close to only citing yourself/etc. Please read the policies and guidelines. Thanks. -- Dirk Beetstra T C 16:36, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
I note that, in one of your first edits on wikipedia, you describe yourself in Values education as "a leading expert in the field - Dr Bill Robb". Hrafn Talk Stalk( P) 05:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
OK:
This is the only warning you will receive for your
disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a
spam link, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites
blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on
Wikipedia.
Stop pushing your own links. This is a final warning, discuss and do not add your links or other information regarding YOURSELF anywhere in mainspace. Use the talkpages. -- Dirk Beetstra T C 10:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia.
You felt the necessity to undo reverts of your edits again, after this final warning. You are close to an indef block as a Spam-only account. Please reconsider your style, as suggested in several posts above. -- Dirk Beetstra T C 20:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
|
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Peace education, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Hrafn Talk Stalk( P) 08:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
In response to your "Still not sure why deleted" -- my reason was contained in my edit summary: "Rvt: MASSIVELY WP:COI edit, as well as removing a number of fact-tags without providing a ref & introducing unsourced material".
Now please stop:
Please read WP:COI. Hrafn Talk Stalk( P) 11:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
...I cannot find anything that you have added that wasn't either cited to yourself (as either Bill Robb or W. Robb) or uncited. In addition to WP:COI, please read WP:V & WP:NOR (particularly WP:NOR#Citing oneself). Hrafn Talk Stalk( P) 11:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hrafn Talk Stalk( P) 12:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.
This guideline STRONGLY discourages you to make edits where you cite your own work, add links to things you are affiliated with, etc. etc. You are close to a 3RR (which is also true for Hrafn), but I do agree with his edits. I will strongly advice you to discuss the edits on the talkpage, and NOT to make them yourself. Referencing to own work is not strange in academics, but referencing only to your own work is frowned upon, as it is here. Your edits are quite close to only citing yourself/etc. Please read the policies and guidelines. Thanks. -- Dirk Beetstra T C 16:36, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
I note that, in one of your first edits on wikipedia, you describe yourself in Values education as "a leading expert in the field - Dr Bill Robb". Hrafn Talk Stalk( P) 05:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
OK:
This is the only warning you will receive for your
disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a
spam link, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites
blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on
Wikipedia.
Stop pushing your own links. This is a final warning, discuss and do not add your links or other information regarding YOURSELF anywhere in mainspace. Use the talkpages. -- Dirk Beetstra T C 10:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia.
You felt the necessity to undo reverts of your edits again, after this final warning. You are close to an indef block as a Spam-only account. Please reconsider your style, as suggested in several posts above. -- Dirk Beetstra T C 20:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)