Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.
You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.
Here are some links I've found useful:
Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username.
I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!Johann Wolfgang T ... C
04:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks, Johann.
Bill Slawski
23:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi Bill,
I saw your edits at the seo article, good to "see" you again. You said that your worked on some other articles so you ended up flying under my radar a bit. Too bad that I could not make it to Pubcon2006 , but I will be in Vegas in January. Affiliate Summit. I don't think that you would come to an Affiliate Marketing Industry event, right?
I could not go to PubCon, so PubCon had to come to me. I created last weekend entries for PubCon and Search Engine Strategies ;)
Cheers, Carsten aka -- roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 06:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Btw. I just found this cool Edit Counter (the official one is down for privacy reasons :( ). It shows a lot of details. See
my counts and details. --
roy<sac>
Talk! .oOo.
08:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Bill. I note you are one of the editors of the Aliweb article. When I first saw Aliweb being added to List of search engines I became concerned it was not a bona fide search engine. The present reality of www.aliweb.com is very disconcerting. I wonder if you still have Aliweb on your watch list, and might be willing to participate in Talk page discussions there. The current grievance is that my critical comments were deleted both from the article talk and from Talk:List of search engines, although since the latter is more heavily watched, an observant person restored them. Taking the article itself to AfD due to lack of reliable sources might be an option. If you are no long interested in the Aliweb article no response is needed. Thanks! EdJohnston 16:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Bill! When reverting spam it's a good idea to use the spam templates to place a warning on the user's talk page. That allows us to give increasingly stern warnings to repeat offenders, or even block them from further editing. Jehochman ( Talk/ Contrib) 18:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
I've nominated search engine optimization for featured article status. Could you possibly look at the references on the article and then leave your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Search engine optimization as to whether you think the blogs and forums cited as references qualify as reliable sources. In order to achieve featured article status we need community consensus that the references are reliable. If you know any other Wikipedians who have expertise in this area, we welcome their comments. Thank you! Jehochman ☎ / ✔ 17:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Search engine optimization has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Pyrospirit ( talk · contribs) 23:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Bill Slawski,
I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in
United States legal articles to take a look at
WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".
Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.
What you can do now:
Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/ WP:Hornbook 20:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Bill Slawski!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Greenman (
talk)
12:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.
You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.
Here are some links I've found useful:
Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username.
I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!Johann Wolfgang T ... C
04:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks, Johann.
Bill Slawski
23:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi Bill,
I saw your edits at the seo article, good to "see" you again. You said that your worked on some other articles so you ended up flying under my radar a bit. Too bad that I could not make it to Pubcon2006 , but I will be in Vegas in January. Affiliate Summit. I don't think that you would come to an Affiliate Marketing Industry event, right?
I could not go to PubCon, so PubCon had to come to me. I created last weekend entries for PubCon and Search Engine Strategies ;)
Cheers, Carsten aka -- roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 06:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Btw. I just found this cool Edit Counter (the official one is down for privacy reasons :( ). It shows a lot of details. See
my counts and details. --
roy<sac>
Talk! .oOo.
08:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Bill. I note you are one of the editors of the Aliweb article. When I first saw Aliweb being added to List of search engines I became concerned it was not a bona fide search engine. The present reality of www.aliweb.com is very disconcerting. I wonder if you still have Aliweb on your watch list, and might be willing to participate in Talk page discussions there. The current grievance is that my critical comments were deleted both from the article talk and from Talk:List of search engines, although since the latter is more heavily watched, an observant person restored them. Taking the article itself to AfD due to lack of reliable sources might be an option. If you are no long interested in the Aliweb article no response is needed. Thanks! EdJohnston 16:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Bill! When reverting spam it's a good idea to use the spam templates to place a warning on the user's talk page. That allows us to give increasingly stern warnings to repeat offenders, or even block them from further editing. Jehochman ( Talk/ Contrib) 18:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
I've nominated search engine optimization for featured article status. Could you possibly look at the references on the article and then leave your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Search engine optimization as to whether you think the blogs and forums cited as references qualify as reliable sources. In order to achieve featured article status we need community consensus that the references are reliable. If you know any other Wikipedians who have expertise in this area, we welcome their comments. Thank you! Jehochman ☎ / ✔ 17:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Search engine optimization has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Pyrospirit ( talk · contribs) 23:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Bill Slawski,
I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in
United States legal articles to take a look at
WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".
Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.
What you can do now:
Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/ WP:Hornbook 20:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Bill Slawski!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Greenman (
talk)
12:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
|