Hello, Bill Mehalus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! PK T(alk) 03:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. PK T(alk) 03:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
The article The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable book by anonymous author
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Malik Shabazz
Talk/
Stalk 04:24, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi Bill Mehalus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
In response to your feedback
Do the references speak about the book???? See WP:42. In my quick look it appeared the references should have been in the book, ie: they didn't show what independent writers in reliable sources had said about the book.
Ariconte ( talk) 02:32, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ariconte ( talk) 02:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
The place to state your case is at https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Antisocial_Manifesto:_A_Bipolar_Perspective_on_Dissent_from_Society
Deleting the tag at the (or commentin it out) will not achieve anything. Regards, Ariconte ( talk) 04:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Fuck you Ariconte
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.
Ariconte (
talk) 05:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Bill Mehalus ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
- 101.12.134.61 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Melton Jones". The reason given for Melton Jones's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: user:Bill Mehalus".
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs) 16:03, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Hello Wiki Team, I appreciate the feedback from all of you; except from one. Yunshui. His comment was:
Hello Portwell,
The existence of a book (or anything else) is not sufficient grounds for inclusion on Wikipedia - we only publish articles about topics that meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. To compare the notability of a self-published book launched through CreateSpace to that of a novel released by Random House which became one of the bestselling books of all time is, frankly, somehwat laughable.
Since you have not requested a new username, and since you app arently do not wish to edit Wikipedia beyond promoting your book, I am closing this unblock request.
Yunshui English Wikipedia Administrator
I have three comments and I hope this is the forum for it. First, apparently is one word, not two (lack of attention to detail). Second, Yunshui, Da Vinci Code was published by Bantam and Double Day, not Random House as you stated. Third, it is because of Wikipedia's lack of accuracy (such as your errors with spelling and in publishing companies, Yunshui) that every college professor claims, "Do not reference Wikipedia. It is not a notable source."
Bill Mehalus ( talk) 06:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Bill Mehalus
This edit is enough to win you a new block. But trying to push your book also has something to do with it. You also qualify for an indefinite block for sock puppetry. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 12:05, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Bill Mehalus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! PK T(alk) 03:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. PK T(alk) 03:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
The article The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable book by anonymous author
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Malik Shabazz
Talk/
Stalk 04:24, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Bill Mehalus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
In response to your feedback
Do the references speak about the book???? See WP:42. In my quick look it appeared the references should have been in the book, ie: they didn't show what independent writers in reliable sources had said about the book.
Ariconte ( talk) 02:32, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ariconte ( talk) 02:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
The place to state your case is at https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Antisocial_Manifesto:_A_Bipolar_Perspective_on_Dissent_from_Society
Deleting the tag at the (or commentin it out) will not achieve anything. Regards, Ariconte ( talk) 04:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Fuck you Ariconte
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.
Ariconte (
talk) 05:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Bill Mehalus ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
- 101.12.134.61 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Melton Jones". The reason given for Melton Jones's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: user:Bill Mehalus".
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs) 16:03, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Hello Wiki Team, I appreciate the feedback from all of you; except from one. Yunshui. His comment was:
Hello Portwell,
The existence of a book (or anything else) is not sufficient grounds for inclusion on Wikipedia - we only publish articles about topics that meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. To compare the notability of a self-published book launched through CreateSpace to that of a novel released by Random House which became one of the bestselling books of all time is, frankly, somehwat laughable.
Since you have not requested a new username, and since you app arently do not wish to edit Wikipedia beyond promoting your book, I am closing this unblock request.
Yunshui English Wikipedia Administrator
I have three comments and I hope this is the forum for it. First, apparently is one word, not two (lack of attention to detail). Second, Yunshui, Da Vinci Code was published by Bantam and Double Day, not Random House as you stated. Third, it is because of Wikipedia's lack of accuracy (such as your errors with spelling and in publishing companies, Yunshui) that every college professor claims, "Do not reference Wikipedia. It is not a notable source."
Bill Mehalus ( talk) 06:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Bill Mehalus
This edit is enough to win you a new block. But trying to push your book also has something to do with it. You also qualify for an indefinite block for sock puppetry. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 12:05, 15 February 2013 (UTC)