From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC notification: Draft:Stephen Meade has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stephen Meade. Thanks! Rankersbo ( talk) 22:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Problems with Draft:Stephen Meade and with your account

First of all, as I said on IRC, your username is a violation of Wikipedia's username policy because it's the name of a company and implies shared use. Wikipedia accounts are for individuals, not for groups or corporations, and the username should reflect that. You should either request a username change or abandon this account and create a new one with an acceptable username, or the account may be blocked from editing. Also, as part of the prohibition against shared use of accounts, only one person may have access to an account, ever. If you edit from that account, it's yours, not Stephen Meade's, and Mr. Meade should not have access to it. If Mr. Meade also wants to edit Wikipedia, he should create an account of their own (or edit without one).

Secondly, you should take a look at WP:Referencing for beginners on how to easily create nicely-formatted footnotes for your sources. But thirdly, many of the links you currently use point to press releases or the like, which are not considered reliable by Wikipedia's standards since they're not subject to meaningful editorial oversight or fact-checking. Even worse, some paragraphs don't seem to be based on any of the given sources. Huon ( talk) 01:10, 6 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Meade (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Arthur goes shopping was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Arthur goes shopping ( talk) 12:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC) reply


Teahouse logo
Hello! BigBamboollc, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Arthur goes shopping ( talk) 12:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC) reply


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC notification: Draft:Stephen Meade has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stephen Meade. Thanks! Rankersbo ( talk) 22:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Problems with Draft:Stephen Meade and with your account

First of all, as I said on IRC, your username is a violation of Wikipedia's username policy because it's the name of a company and implies shared use. Wikipedia accounts are for individuals, not for groups or corporations, and the username should reflect that. You should either request a username change or abandon this account and create a new one with an acceptable username, or the account may be blocked from editing. Also, as part of the prohibition against shared use of accounts, only one person may have access to an account, ever. If you edit from that account, it's yours, not Stephen Meade's, and Mr. Meade should not have access to it. If Mr. Meade also wants to edit Wikipedia, he should create an account of their own (or edit without one).

Secondly, you should take a look at WP:Referencing for beginners on how to easily create nicely-formatted footnotes for your sources. But thirdly, many of the links you currently use point to press releases or the like, which are not considered reliable by Wikipedia's standards since they're not subject to meaningful editorial oversight or fact-checking. Even worse, some paragraphs don't seem to be based on any of the given sources. Huon ( talk) 01:10, 6 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Meade (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Arthur goes shopping was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Arthur goes shopping ( talk) 12:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC) reply


Teahouse logo
Hello! BigBamboollc, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Arthur goes shopping ( talk) 12:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC) reply



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook