My name is
Λua∫
Wi
se and I have been on Wikipedia for sometime now. I have been wandering around when I saw your name and decided to drop by to see if you need help with Wikipedia. I have also attached this list of some links that might help you:
You should also note that you have to sign your comments by using four of those ~ at the end of your messages (i.e. ~~~~, this will simply place your user name and date; see my signature at the end of this message as an example.)
Please do not hesitate to
contact me should you have a question or require help with Wikipedia, you can
leave me a new message here.
P.S. Some new users find editing Wikipedia a bit difficult at first, but it only seems this way. In fact it is quite easy to get used to editing it and actually finding that enjoyable ! :)
Good luck! :)
Λua∫ Wi se ( Operibus anteire) 18:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello! The simplest way to see what it does is to try it yourself! Right now, reach for that edit button and type ~~~~, save and see what happens! It will place your name and date, so that others know who is leaving messages on talkpages, go ahead and do it! Cheers! :) Λua∫ Wi se ( Operibus anteire) 09:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Ok Beth no problem! If you have any query, you know where to reach me! ;) Λua∫ Wi se ( Operibus anteire) 11:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you have been adding links to willpearson.co.uk to multiple articles. Also that you created an article on Will Pearson. I suspect that you may have a conflict of interest and that what you are engaged is considered spamming. If you have a conflict of interest then you need to be bringing the links up for discussion on each articles talk, not merely adding them without discussion to multiple articles. Please read Wikipedia:SPAM#How_not_to_be_a_spammer. Mfield ( talk) 17:33, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello - I don't know how to respond to you directly - so am editing this page in the hope that you can see it?
Do I know Will Pearson? Yes I do - I'm his fiance! I am also a photographer's agent, and so think that it's reasonable that I can write an article without a conflict of interest. We frequently have publications getting in touch who have looked for information about Will, and so a Wiki article makes sense to me - especially as other people can add to it with further sources. If I haven't done this correctly, please accept my apologies, I'm a bit new to all of this. If you could suggest anything else that would help with the article then I can add that? Your guidance would be appreciated.
Re the guidelines you linked to:
"Conflict of interest often presents itself in the form of self-promotion, including advertising links, personal website links, personal or semi-personal photos, or other material that appears to promote the private or commercial interests of the editor, or their associates.
Examples of these types of material include:
1. Links that appear to promote products by pointing to obscure or not particularly relevant commercial sites (commercial links). 2. Links that appear to promote otherwise obscure individuals by pointing to their personal pages. 3. Biographical material that does not significantly add to the clarity or quality of the article."
This doesn't seem to be relevant - he is not obscure, which can be demonstrated as he is an exhibiting artists, is featured in the press etc.
"Closeness to a subject does not mean you're incapable of being neutral, but it may incline you towards some bias. Be guided by the advice of other editors. If editors on a talk page suggest in good faith that you may have a conflict of interest, try to identify and minimize your biases, and consider withdrawing from editing the article. As a rule of thumb, the more involvement you have with a topic in real life, the more careful you should be with our core content policies"
Noted - and yes, I may well be biassed I guess! But I hope that I can demonstrate enough external sources that it doesn't matter. Again, your guidance would be appreciated if you have some comments about this. (I don't know what 'speedied' means?)
External links - I have read quite a bit about this on Wikipedia, and I hope there's nothing untoward about this. I have not linked to the main page or anything salesy on the site, rather I have simply added links to content which is highly relevant to the subject. As far as I can understand from what I have read, this seems to be encouraged. Am I wrong on this?
Thanks for your help and input :-)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page
Virgin Mobile do not comply with our
guidelines for external links and have been removed.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for
advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the
article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. As eyerevolutions is your company, and you've already been warned about COI on your fiance's article you should know better.
Blowdart |
talk
00:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
More London.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including
Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.
Blowdart |
talk
00:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Fitness First. It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Blowdart |
talk
00:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your
disruptive edits. The next time you insert a
spam link, as you did to
Metropolitan Borough of Shoreditch, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites
blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all
Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being
penalized by search engines.
Blowdart |
talk
00:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
User:Bethmenzies has not added any further links since I explained the situation above. Please check the date before posting further warnings. Mfield ( talk) 00:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
My name is
Λua∫
Wi
se and I have been on Wikipedia for sometime now. I have been wandering around when I saw your name and decided to drop by to see if you need help with Wikipedia. I have also attached this list of some links that might help you:
You should also note that you have to sign your comments by using four of those ~ at the end of your messages (i.e. ~~~~, this will simply place your user name and date; see my signature at the end of this message as an example.)
Please do not hesitate to
contact me should you have a question or require help with Wikipedia, you can
leave me a new message here.
P.S. Some new users find editing Wikipedia a bit difficult at first, but it only seems this way. In fact it is quite easy to get used to editing it and actually finding that enjoyable ! :)
Good luck! :)
Λua∫ Wi se ( Operibus anteire) 18:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello! The simplest way to see what it does is to try it yourself! Right now, reach for that edit button and type ~~~~, save and see what happens! It will place your name and date, so that others know who is leaving messages on talkpages, go ahead and do it! Cheers! :) Λua∫ Wi se ( Operibus anteire) 09:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Ok Beth no problem! If you have any query, you know where to reach me! ;) Λua∫ Wi se ( Operibus anteire) 11:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you have been adding links to willpearson.co.uk to multiple articles. Also that you created an article on Will Pearson. I suspect that you may have a conflict of interest and that what you are engaged is considered spamming. If you have a conflict of interest then you need to be bringing the links up for discussion on each articles talk, not merely adding them without discussion to multiple articles. Please read Wikipedia:SPAM#How_not_to_be_a_spammer. Mfield ( talk) 17:33, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello - I don't know how to respond to you directly - so am editing this page in the hope that you can see it?
Do I know Will Pearson? Yes I do - I'm his fiance! I am also a photographer's agent, and so think that it's reasonable that I can write an article without a conflict of interest. We frequently have publications getting in touch who have looked for information about Will, and so a Wiki article makes sense to me - especially as other people can add to it with further sources. If I haven't done this correctly, please accept my apologies, I'm a bit new to all of this. If you could suggest anything else that would help with the article then I can add that? Your guidance would be appreciated.
Re the guidelines you linked to:
"Conflict of interest often presents itself in the form of self-promotion, including advertising links, personal website links, personal or semi-personal photos, or other material that appears to promote the private or commercial interests of the editor, or their associates.
Examples of these types of material include:
1. Links that appear to promote products by pointing to obscure or not particularly relevant commercial sites (commercial links). 2. Links that appear to promote otherwise obscure individuals by pointing to their personal pages. 3. Biographical material that does not significantly add to the clarity or quality of the article."
This doesn't seem to be relevant - he is not obscure, which can be demonstrated as he is an exhibiting artists, is featured in the press etc.
"Closeness to a subject does not mean you're incapable of being neutral, but it may incline you towards some bias. Be guided by the advice of other editors. If editors on a talk page suggest in good faith that you may have a conflict of interest, try to identify and minimize your biases, and consider withdrawing from editing the article. As a rule of thumb, the more involvement you have with a topic in real life, the more careful you should be with our core content policies"
Noted - and yes, I may well be biassed I guess! But I hope that I can demonstrate enough external sources that it doesn't matter. Again, your guidance would be appreciated if you have some comments about this. (I don't know what 'speedied' means?)
External links - I have read quite a bit about this on Wikipedia, and I hope there's nothing untoward about this. I have not linked to the main page or anything salesy on the site, rather I have simply added links to content which is highly relevant to the subject. As far as I can understand from what I have read, this seems to be encouraged. Am I wrong on this?
Thanks for your help and input :-)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page
Virgin Mobile do not comply with our
guidelines for external links and have been removed.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for
advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the
article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. As eyerevolutions is your company, and you've already been warned about COI on your fiance's article you should know better.
Blowdart |
talk
00:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
More London.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including
Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.
Blowdart |
talk
00:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Fitness First. It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Blowdart |
talk
00:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your
disruptive edits. The next time you insert a
spam link, as you did to
Metropolitan Borough of Shoreditch, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites
blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all
Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being
penalized by search engines.
Blowdart |
talk
00:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
User:Bethmenzies has not added any further links since I explained the situation above. Please check the date before posting further warnings. Mfield ( talk) 00:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC)