Welcome!
Hello, Best Dog Ever, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Laurinavicius (
talk) 07:32, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
You'd have to be a massive idiot to call a truthful statement vandalism. Sereptis ( talk) 02:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC)sereptis
For being patient with me and setting me straight on the Firefox article! I learned a valuable lesson, and I appreciate the suggestion about going to the Firefox forums. You truly are the Best Dog Ever! Have a great day. 24.10.181.254 ( talk) 15:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
I really appreciate all the help, its comforting knowing that there's actually some decent people on wikipedia. Thanks for the link, have'nt tried it yet but i have no doubt that it'll probably work! I am really using the viruses for research though, not only testing antivirus programs but also to see the extent of damage from some of these viruses. If you find any other sites have particularly terrrible viruses please don't hesitate to contact me, I'm looking for the really really really nasty ones. Thanks again for all the help! Wikiholicforever ( talk) 02:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Best Dog Ever
I'm writing in to inform you that your bold edit in Microsoft Expression Web article is contested per Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. My concern is that the source seems to qualify as reliable because:
Still, if you disagree, I respect your right to engage in discussion in article talk page per Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Fleet Command ( talk) 13:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Good work, Best Dog Ever. Thanks for doing it.
But now, we can neither write "it is WYSIWYG" nor write "it is not WYSIWYG". We have to write the fact; and the fact is that Microsoft says it is WYSIWYG but some other authorities say it is not WYSIWYG. We should also cite from both.
Although, I have to admit that I don't know why some people call it WYSIWYG: I have a copy of MSEW v3 and what I see is clearly not what I get – or at least, only what I see in preview mode is what I get! Maybe we should include an appropriate screenshot, so that people can see for themselves.
Fleet Command ( talk) 04:38, 11 October 2010 (UTC)I see. That's enough to discredit the forum post. Alright then, go ahead and call it WYSIWYG, citing three of your best sources – The latter source from Microsoft is great, IMHO. Although, you'd probably like to go the last remaining inch and make nobody can claim that the Pearson source is newer than Microsoft FrontPage to Expression Web; so make sure the from which you cite are about as latest the version of EW as possible.
Oh, and congratulation. That was a good job. Sorry for being busy on Wikimedia Commons and not being able to help. Fleet Command ( talk) 10:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello, BDE
Since it is you who attests, I won't contest; but you still need source. Verification is a pillar of Wikipedia, remember?
Mind you, I myself know of a couple of programs that are called Flash Decompiler or SWF Decompiler. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] But I tried a couple of them and none of them decompiled; they just extracted resources. (It was as if someone claim to be selling you a disassembler but instead sell you ResEdit or IcoFX.)
Do you know any actual decompiler? Fleet Command ( talk) 14:22, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
It's important that controversial topics adhere to neutral point of view and get extra-careful attention when it comes to verifiability and citing sources. Editors should allow their knowledge of the topic to guide them to evidence, from all angles, that is published in reliable sources. Then they can assemble that evidence, without pushing POV, and without producing claims of their own.
I posted three questions at Talk:Comparison of HTML5 and Flash about your edits. I've demonstrated that I'm willing to put in the work to make this as useful an article as possible, and going forward, hope we can work together constructively. -- Pnm ( talk) 03:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
standardization cannot be under the control of companies. every party has right to vote. adobe systems has many members in w3c. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.152.181.38 ( talk) 04:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, BDE
When you undo someone's edit that is not blatant vandalism, please provide an edit summary. Thanks in advance. Fleet Command ( talk) 20:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, BDE.
Regarding your edit to Talk:Gnash § Fair use rationale for Image:Gnash-logo.png, I think the guy was obviously trolling because:
Now, I don't want to be anywhere near him the day the he discovers there is actually nothing free about his beloved free software. Fleet Command ( talk) 05:30, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
We had consensus for that title at Talk:IOS. Marcus Qwertyus 05:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of
edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on
IOS. Users are expected to
collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Marcus Qwertyus 05:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Why exactly did you choose this particular title for the article describing Apple's iOS product? Apple does not even call the software "iPhone OS" anymore, it makes little sense for this to be the article's title. Also, I am having trouble following links to the discussion that would justify your series of rename and moves. Can you please help bring this title and the IOS disambiguation pages back to following guidelines (and manual of style recommendations) as they were previously? thanks, riffic ( talk) 07:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
I have reverted you renaming of the iOS article. The present title is the result of a requested move ( Talk:IOS (disambiguation)#Try it as a multi-move), so moving it to a new title is by definition contested and can only be accomplished through a new request at WP:RM. Favonian ( talk) 10:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Take the matter up with User:Marcus Qwertyus, who requested that the move be made. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 21:10, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Stop adding irrelevant information into the Flash vs HTML article.
See Talk:Comparison_of_HTML5_and_Flash#Improvements_and_merging
Tom Jenkins (reply) 06:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
So now you've started biasing the article towards Flash with the Anti-aliasing? I marked it "depends" because it only supports it for embedded fonts. You changed it to "yes" and moved the point to a footnote? Then why don't we do that for all the HTML points as well? Stop being biased towards Flash or stop editing the article to show that. I'm warning you about WP:COI if its not the first time you've been warned. -- Tom Jenkins (reply) 08:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
I was the one to add those quotes in the first place. I'm trying to use "summary style" and keep things short and terse instead of branching out into long quotations. -- Tom Jenkins (reply) 10:08, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Please stop edit-warring regarding the HTML/Flash article. Its fine to add features into the Flash part, but not fine to demote the HTML5 features (changing video streaming to red, changing HTML antialiasing to depends) or similar just to make Flash look better, and definitely not fine to revert everything I've done only to preserve some other content regarding Flash. I'm not biased towards HTML, on the contrary I'm the one to massively upgrade the comparison chart for Flash and HTML in the first place. See this, this and this where I have added features supported by Flash that were not present in the comparison before. -- Tom Jenkins (reply) 09:30, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is " Comparison of HTML5 and Flash". Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you!
EarwigBot operator / talk 09:28, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
★ the minimal barnstar Thank you for all your help on the ref desk.
pablo 09:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry to bother you, but can you again try to help with the IE8/IE10 thing you helped me with yesterday at the Reference Desk? I've performed multiple system restores; each one gets me back to IE8, but I can't keep the system from downloading the IE10 update (it appears to be packaged with important updates that I don't want to avoid), and whenever I disable IE10, it simply disables IE entirely. I've even put IE8's entire group of folders onto a flash drive, but the system refuses to open the installation file. I doubt that Microsoft will care if I tell them that I see this as malware (which I do, because it installs itself and I can't get rid of it), so I feel hopeless. 98.223.199.119 ( talk) 05:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I hope you are well. I was wondering if you could help me. I wish to learn ‘Photoshop’ and ‘illustrator’, from the very basic to the most advanced level. Could you please guide me and or help me in order to learn…? Mr. Prophet ( talk) 19:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Best Dog Ever. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) I *did* provide a link but someone renamed it!
Also it wasn't a mere link, it was a transclusion which contained a link and the table. So the table would have been still inside the original article (per reference), if Bgwhite hadn't renamed the sub-pages without adding redirects. -- Pizzahut2 ( talk) 20:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
For demonstration: User:Pizzahut2/sandbox The advantage being that the roadmap can be in two (or more) articles. Why in several articles? At first (in 2013, so 3 years ago) people wanted to move the roadmaps from Tick-Tock model to List of Intel CPU microarchitectures. Then someone reverted this move on *one* of the pages, so the roadmaps were on two. Years later, I've started editing the main roadmap a lot, so had to keep both articles in sync. I've then moved the roadmap again as no one in three years (!) had argued against the move, and the revert was due to other reasons. But soon this 2nd attempt got reverted again. So my idea to please everyone was, use a template for the road maps so it can be used in several articles. That's not even something that has never done before, as there already is a simplified one here: Template:Intel processor roadmap. However the visual editor, which is extremely useful for tables, doesn't work in templates. So I made article sub pages instead and trancluded them. But seems this is against the rules unfortunately, so now I'm out of ideas. -- Pizzahut2 ( talk) 03:48, 20 December 2016 (UTC) Hello, Best Dog Ever. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Hello, Best Dog Ever. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
Welcome!
Hello, Best Dog Ever, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Laurinavicius (
talk) 07:32, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
You'd have to be a massive idiot to call a truthful statement vandalism. Sereptis ( talk) 02:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC)sereptis
For being patient with me and setting me straight on the Firefox article! I learned a valuable lesson, and I appreciate the suggestion about going to the Firefox forums. You truly are the Best Dog Ever! Have a great day. 24.10.181.254 ( talk) 15:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
I really appreciate all the help, its comforting knowing that there's actually some decent people on wikipedia. Thanks for the link, have'nt tried it yet but i have no doubt that it'll probably work! I am really using the viruses for research though, not only testing antivirus programs but also to see the extent of damage from some of these viruses. If you find any other sites have particularly terrrible viruses please don't hesitate to contact me, I'm looking for the really really really nasty ones. Thanks again for all the help! Wikiholicforever ( talk) 02:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Best Dog Ever
I'm writing in to inform you that your bold edit in Microsoft Expression Web article is contested per Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. My concern is that the source seems to qualify as reliable because:
Still, if you disagree, I respect your right to engage in discussion in article talk page per Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Fleet Command ( talk) 13:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Good work, Best Dog Ever. Thanks for doing it.
But now, we can neither write "it is WYSIWYG" nor write "it is not WYSIWYG". We have to write the fact; and the fact is that Microsoft says it is WYSIWYG but some other authorities say it is not WYSIWYG. We should also cite from both.
Although, I have to admit that I don't know why some people call it WYSIWYG: I have a copy of MSEW v3 and what I see is clearly not what I get – or at least, only what I see in preview mode is what I get! Maybe we should include an appropriate screenshot, so that people can see for themselves.
Fleet Command ( talk) 04:38, 11 October 2010 (UTC)I see. That's enough to discredit the forum post. Alright then, go ahead and call it WYSIWYG, citing three of your best sources – The latter source from Microsoft is great, IMHO. Although, you'd probably like to go the last remaining inch and make nobody can claim that the Pearson source is newer than Microsoft FrontPage to Expression Web; so make sure the from which you cite are about as latest the version of EW as possible.
Oh, and congratulation. That was a good job. Sorry for being busy on Wikimedia Commons and not being able to help. Fleet Command ( talk) 10:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello, BDE
Since it is you who attests, I won't contest; but you still need source. Verification is a pillar of Wikipedia, remember?
Mind you, I myself know of a couple of programs that are called Flash Decompiler or SWF Decompiler. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] But I tried a couple of them and none of them decompiled; they just extracted resources. (It was as if someone claim to be selling you a disassembler but instead sell you ResEdit or IcoFX.)
Do you know any actual decompiler? Fleet Command ( talk) 14:22, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
It's important that controversial topics adhere to neutral point of view and get extra-careful attention when it comes to verifiability and citing sources. Editors should allow their knowledge of the topic to guide them to evidence, from all angles, that is published in reliable sources. Then they can assemble that evidence, without pushing POV, and without producing claims of their own.
I posted three questions at Talk:Comparison of HTML5 and Flash about your edits. I've demonstrated that I'm willing to put in the work to make this as useful an article as possible, and going forward, hope we can work together constructively. -- Pnm ( talk) 03:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
standardization cannot be under the control of companies. every party has right to vote. adobe systems has many members in w3c. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.152.181.38 ( talk) 04:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, BDE
When you undo someone's edit that is not blatant vandalism, please provide an edit summary. Thanks in advance. Fleet Command ( talk) 20:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, BDE.
Regarding your edit to Talk:Gnash § Fair use rationale for Image:Gnash-logo.png, I think the guy was obviously trolling because:
Now, I don't want to be anywhere near him the day the he discovers there is actually nothing free about his beloved free software. Fleet Command ( talk) 05:30, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
We had consensus for that title at Talk:IOS. Marcus Qwertyus 05:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of
edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on
IOS. Users are expected to
collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Marcus Qwertyus 05:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Why exactly did you choose this particular title for the article describing Apple's iOS product? Apple does not even call the software "iPhone OS" anymore, it makes little sense for this to be the article's title. Also, I am having trouble following links to the discussion that would justify your series of rename and moves. Can you please help bring this title and the IOS disambiguation pages back to following guidelines (and manual of style recommendations) as they were previously? thanks, riffic ( talk) 07:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
I have reverted you renaming of the iOS article. The present title is the result of a requested move ( Talk:IOS (disambiguation)#Try it as a multi-move), so moving it to a new title is by definition contested and can only be accomplished through a new request at WP:RM. Favonian ( talk) 10:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Take the matter up with User:Marcus Qwertyus, who requested that the move be made. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 21:10, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Stop adding irrelevant information into the Flash vs HTML article.
See Talk:Comparison_of_HTML5_and_Flash#Improvements_and_merging
Tom Jenkins (reply) 06:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
So now you've started biasing the article towards Flash with the Anti-aliasing? I marked it "depends" because it only supports it for embedded fonts. You changed it to "yes" and moved the point to a footnote? Then why don't we do that for all the HTML points as well? Stop being biased towards Flash or stop editing the article to show that. I'm warning you about WP:COI if its not the first time you've been warned. -- Tom Jenkins (reply) 08:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
I was the one to add those quotes in the first place. I'm trying to use "summary style" and keep things short and terse instead of branching out into long quotations. -- Tom Jenkins (reply) 10:08, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Please stop edit-warring regarding the HTML/Flash article. Its fine to add features into the Flash part, but not fine to demote the HTML5 features (changing video streaming to red, changing HTML antialiasing to depends) or similar just to make Flash look better, and definitely not fine to revert everything I've done only to preserve some other content regarding Flash. I'm not biased towards HTML, on the contrary I'm the one to massively upgrade the comparison chart for Flash and HTML in the first place. See this, this and this where I have added features supported by Flash that were not present in the comparison before. -- Tom Jenkins (reply) 09:30, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is " Comparison of HTML5 and Flash". Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you!
EarwigBot operator / talk 09:28, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
★ the minimal barnstar Thank you for all your help on the ref desk.
pablo 09:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry to bother you, but can you again try to help with the IE8/IE10 thing you helped me with yesterday at the Reference Desk? I've performed multiple system restores; each one gets me back to IE8, but I can't keep the system from downloading the IE10 update (it appears to be packaged with important updates that I don't want to avoid), and whenever I disable IE10, it simply disables IE entirely. I've even put IE8's entire group of folders onto a flash drive, but the system refuses to open the installation file. I doubt that Microsoft will care if I tell them that I see this as malware (which I do, because it installs itself and I can't get rid of it), so I feel hopeless. 98.223.199.119 ( talk) 05:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I hope you are well. I was wondering if you could help me. I wish to learn ‘Photoshop’ and ‘illustrator’, from the very basic to the most advanced level. Could you please guide me and or help me in order to learn…? Mr. Prophet ( talk) 19:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Best Dog Ever. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) I *did* provide a link but someone renamed it!
Also it wasn't a mere link, it was a transclusion which contained a link and the table. So the table would have been still inside the original article (per reference), if Bgwhite hadn't renamed the sub-pages without adding redirects. -- Pizzahut2 ( talk) 20:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
For demonstration: User:Pizzahut2/sandbox The advantage being that the roadmap can be in two (or more) articles. Why in several articles? At first (in 2013, so 3 years ago) people wanted to move the roadmaps from Tick-Tock model to List of Intel CPU microarchitectures. Then someone reverted this move on *one* of the pages, so the roadmaps were on two. Years later, I've started editing the main roadmap a lot, so had to keep both articles in sync. I've then moved the roadmap again as no one in three years (!) had argued against the move, and the revert was due to other reasons. But soon this 2nd attempt got reverted again. So my idea to please everyone was, use a template for the road maps so it can be used in several articles. That's not even something that has never done before, as there already is a simplified one here: Template:Intel processor roadmap. However the visual editor, which is extremely useful for tables, doesn't work in templates. So I made article sub pages instead and trancluded them. But seems this is against the rules unfortunately, so now I'm out of ideas. -- Pizzahut2 ( talk) 03:48, 20 December 2016 (UTC) Hello, Best Dog Ever. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Hello, Best Dog Ever. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |