![]() | Welcome to my talk page!
![]() |
This is Besieged's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 31 days
![]() |
i have a problem. it involves you. therefore i ask you to read this message and consider the problem. on jan 17 2018 i edited the WP article 'marshmallow'. the edit took three steps: 1. delete two paragraphs from the marshmellow - sucrose section. 2. write an explanation to the marshmallow - talk page about why i thought the deletion made the article better. 3. check back to the article, which contained by this time the twoo paragraphs that needed to be deleted, so i deleted again.
why you are involved - you left a message on my talkpage after another editor did so, about asking me to not delete content in the way i did.
heres the messages left from you: "January 2018
Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that in this edit to Marshmallow, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA0808 talkcontribs 20:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Marshmallow, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. besiegedtalk 20:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)"
i replied to RA0808 on his/her talkpage but received no answer. no reflection to the arguments laid down at the talk page - marshmallow either.
since i did EXACTLY what i was requested by RA0808 and still got my (second) edit IMMEDIATELY reverted, i do expect RA0808 who seems to have disappeared since then, and to a minor extent in connection of you joining the discussion i also expect you to either give an answer, why my edit is considered unacceptable by you, or an acknowledgement of agreement, so i could go on and delete those two paragraphs without feeling just going into an edit-war a reverting back and forth.
So if you could reflect in some way, it'd be really appreciated. Cheers 80.99.38.199 ( talk) 15:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC).
Hello, thank you. I should try as you adviced. Though the (unrecommended) summary example provided by you seems to me as good as anything i could come up with. Thx again. 80.99.38.199 ( talk) 18:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC).
I think I wrote exactly why. They can't be losing 21% of the adult population otherwise the species would be extinct in the wild today .. and there is no citation. Please confirm that I did properly make an anotation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talon bar ( talk • contribs) 01:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
nate is my close friend we know each other fam mans not hot rodolfo out — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodolfo444 ( talk • contribs) 03:45, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Besieged. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() | Welcome to my talk page!
![]() |
This is Besieged's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 31 days
![]() |
i have a problem. it involves you. therefore i ask you to read this message and consider the problem. on jan 17 2018 i edited the WP article 'marshmallow'. the edit took three steps: 1. delete two paragraphs from the marshmellow - sucrose section. 2. write an explanation to the marshmallow - talk page about why i thought the deletion made the article better. 3. check back to the article, which contained by this time the twoo paragraphs that needed to be deleted, so i deleted again.
why you are involved - you left a message on my talkpage after another editor did so, about asking me to not delete content in the way i did.
heres the messages left from you: "January 2018
Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that in this edit to Marshmallow, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA0808 talkcontribs 20:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Marshmallow, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. besiegedtalk 20:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)"
i replied to RA0808 on his/her talkpage but received no answer. no reflection to the arguments laid down at the talk page - marshmallow either.
since i did EXACTLY what i was requested by RA0808 and still got my (second) edit IMMEDIATELY reverted, i do expect RA0808 who seems to have disappeared since then, and to a minor extent in connection of you joining the discussion i also expect you to either give an answer, why my edit is considered unacceptable by you, or an acknowledgement of agreement, so i could go on and delete those two paragraphs without feeling just going into an edit-war a reverting back and forth.
So if you could reflect in some way, it'd be really appreciated. Cheers 80.99.38.199 ( talk) 15:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC).
Hello, thank you. I should try as you adviced. Though the (unrecommended) summary example provided by you seems to me as good as anything i could come up with. Thx again. 80.99.38.199 ( talk) 18:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC).
I think I wrote exactly why. They can't be losing 21% of the adult population otherwise the species would be extinct in the wild today .. and there is no citation. Please confirm that I did properly make an anotation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talon bar ( talk • contribs) 01:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
nate is my close friend we know each other fam mans not hot rodolfo out — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodolfo444 ( talk • contribs) 03:45, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Besieged. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)