You are suspected of
sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mitchsteinfeld. Thank you. --
Glenfarclas (
talk)
06:55, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our
guide to appealing blocks first.A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wadsworth Jarrell and the AFRI-COBRA movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wadsworth Jarrell and the AFRI-COBRA movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dac04 ( talk) 19:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
You are suspected of
sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mitchsteinfeld. Thank you. --
Glenfarclas (
talk)
06:55, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our
guide to appealing blocks first.A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wadsworth Jarrell and the AFRI-COBRA movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wadsworth Jarrell and the AFRI-COBRA movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dac04 ( talk) 19:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)