This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | → | Archive 60 |
Regarding that, I've filed a SPI. FYI. - ALLST✰R▼ echo wuz here 06:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't really know how to send a personal message, but I believe it is unfair to force the LGBT topic label on every popular individual who is openly gay. I am male, but male issues should not categorize my wiki-label. Unless the celebrity in question is a large contributor to public gay, lesbian, bisexual or (gasp) transgender charities or public discussions on the like, relegating their interest or identity to the LGBT flag is unnecessary and ultimately damaging to the end goal of integrating homosexual or other sexual dispositions into society seamlessly. All black people shouldn't be relegated to black issues, all minority identity shouldn't be a part of someones profile or discussion unless they personally have stated a public state in supporting minority causes. So yea, unless you can cite for me Art Smith's devotion to gay issues, I will continue to remove the flag from his page. It is ultimately about you more than it is about gay and lesbian rights.
Sometimes, fighting tirelessly for perceived injustices on Wikipedia becomes a personal issue, rather than one devoted to the betterment of any minority community. - BP 24.155.242.36
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Since you filed the 3RR on this user, FYI Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Future MD 217. - ALLST✰R▼ echo wuz here 09:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for all the time you've put into those pages. I was surprised when you mentioned being aware of paid editors already on Wikipedia who have not been blocked. I am curious as to the circumstances of their editing and financial arrangements. I don't want to create a blacklist of some sort (I assume you mean people openly editing for pay), but am quite curious since I am unaware of these folks. Could you tell me more about those cases? -- TeaDrinker ( talk) 15:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Benjiboi. You have new messages at ALLST✰R▼echo 's talk page. |
You can remove this notice at any time by removing this template. |
What you are doing in Top and bottom is pure vandalism. Please stop it. -- Meister und Margarita ( talk) 22:20, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Benjiboi, was it really necessary to merge the talk page where Mish and I discussed a proposed request for comment for the article into the other talk archives? I think that what you have done there is confusing rather than helpful, since it was always meant to be a separate page. And the resulting archive page has a talk archive banner in the middle, whereas it should be at the bottom. Born Gay ( talk) 23:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Have you noticed this? I recall you starting an ANI thread; well, here he is essentially admitting he plans to follow that specific editor around! Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 16:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
So umm, is there an article for thisCaution: NSFW link ahead. phenomenon? - 08:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Expand and dyk asap. -- Banjeboi 14:44, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Benjiboi. It seems User:Meister und Margarita has reported you at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Perhaps you'd like to comment? - FASTILY (TALK) 19:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
You reverted the NPOV flag on the closeted page without contributing to the discussion on the talk page. In the edit summary you said that I needed to enter the new information in a NPOV way. I tried to put it in a NPOV way. I do not understand why what I put was not NPOV. You and I are obviously coming at this at different points. If you could please articulate your problems with the edits, I will be glad to address your concerns. However, regardless of how NPOV my edits were, I still think the whole article is POV. Simply removing banners does not resolve the dispute. Please use the area already set up on the talk page. Joshuajohanson ( talk) 00:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 02:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Let me know if you need a hand with anything. Although I'm not really sure why you've not picked up the mop yourself. You obviously have the experience, clue, and ability - but I'll appreciate what you do, and not try to force anything. Cheers. — Ched : ? 06:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.2FRobert Petrick and the section below it should both be referenced. -- Banjeboi 23:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Is this sufficient citation for a newspaper article which is not currently available online?
Sigmund Cuda, Heidi (Thursday, March 28), "Parlour's Tricks Draw a Crowd", Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles, CA {{
citation}}
: Check date values in: |date=
and |year=
/ |date=
mismatch (
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)
Thanks again.
Granny Bebeb (
talk)
01:58, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
I sent you an email - did you ever get it? Some topics are easier to discuss off-Wiki, but if that can't happen then they get pushed back here. Will Beback talk 00:48, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 01:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | → | Archive 60 |
Regarding that, I've filed a SPI. FYI. - ALLST✰R▼ echo wuz here 06:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't really know how to send a personal message, but I believe it is unfair to force the LGBT topic label on every popular individual who is openly gay. I am male, but male issues should not categorize my wiki-label. Unless the celebrity in question is a large contributor to public gay, lesbian, bisexual or (gasp) transgender charities or public discussions on the like, relegating their interest or identity to the LGBT flag is unnecessary and ultimately damaging to the end goal of integrating homosexual or other sexual dispositions into society seamlessly. All black people shouldn't be relegated to black issues, all minority identity shouldn't be a part of someones profile or discussion unless they personally have stated a public state in supporting minority causes. So yea, unless you can cite for me Art Smith's devotion to gay issues, I will continue to remove the flag from his page. It is ultimately about you more than it is about gay and lesbian rights.
Sometimes, fighting tirelessly for perceived injustices on Wikipedia becomes a personal issue, rather than one devoted to the betterment of any minority community. - BP 24.155.242.36
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Since you filed the 3RR on this user, FYI Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Future MD 217. - ALLST✰R▼ echo wuz here 09:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for all the time you've put into those pages. I was surprised when you mentioned being aware of paid editors already on Wikipedia who have not been blocked. I am curious as to the circumstances of their editing and financial arrangements. I don't want to create a blacklist of some sort (I assume you mean people openly editing for pay), but am quite curious since I am unaware of these folks. Could you tell me more about those cases? -- TeaDrinker ( talk) 15:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Benjiboi. You have new messages at ALLST✰R▼echo 's talk page. |
You can remove this notice at any time by removing this template. |
What you are doing in Top and bottom is pure vandalism. Please stop it. -- Meister und Margarita ( talk) 22:20, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Benjiboi, was it really necessary to merge the talk page where Mish and I discussed a proposed request for comment for the article into the other talk archives? I think that what you have done there is confusing rather than helpful, since it was always meant to be a separate page. And the resulting archive page has a talk archive banner in the middle, whereas it should be at the bottom. Born Gay ( talk) 23:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Have you noticed this? I recall you starting an ANI thread; well, here he is essentially admitting he plans to follow that specific editor around! Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 16:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
So umm, is there an article for thisCaution: NSFW link ahead. phenomenon? - 08:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Expand and dyk asap. -- Banjeboi 14:44, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Benjiboi. It seems User:Meister und Margarita has reported you at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Perhaps you'd like to comment? - FASTILY (TALK) 19:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
You reverted the NPOV flag on the closeted page without contributing to the discussion on the talk page. In the edit summary you said that I needed to enter the new information in a NPOV way. I tried to put it in a NPOV way. I do not understand why what I put was not NPOV. You and I are obviously coming at this at different points. If you could please articulate your problems with the edits, I will be glad to address your concerns. However, regardless of how NPOV my edits were, I still think the whole article is POV. Simply removing banners does not resolve the dispute. Please use the area already set up on the talk page. Joshuajohanson ( talk) 00:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 02:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Let me know if you need a hand with anything. Although I'm not really sure why you've not picked up the mop yourself. You obviously have the experience, clue, and ability - but I'll appreciate what you do, and not try to force anything. Cheers. — Ched : ? 06:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.2FRobert Petrick and the section below it should both be referenced. -- Banjeboi 23:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Is this sufficient citation for a newspaper article which is not currently available online?
Sigmund Cuda, Heidi (Thursday, March 28), "Parlour's Tricks Draw a Crowd", Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles, CA {{
citation}}
: Check date values in: |date=
and |year=
/ |date=
mismatch (
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)
Thanks again.
Granny Bebeb (
talk)
01:58, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
I sent you an email - did you ever get it? Some topics are easier to discuss off-Wiki, but if that can't happen then they get pushed back here. Will Beback talk 00:48, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 01:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)