Hello, Belbernard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
{{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —I noticed that you've put your user page into various categories. However, user pages shouldn't be in categories like this: see WP:CATEGORY#User_namespace. You might be better off using userboxes on your userpage instead, such as:
![]() | This user is an engineer. |
![]() | This user comes from France. |
There are many other user-boxes around - if you look at other people's user pages, you may see others you like. If you have any questions about this, or anything else on WP, please get in touch, and I'll try to help. Best wishes, Bencherlite 17:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I reverted the case you added. For such a serious claim as plagiarism to be included, it must be supported by rock-solid reliable sources. Fences& Windows 01:07, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
I included it again with the proper references, notably Notices of the American Mathematical Society 54(4) (2007) p. 472. Bernard Bel ( talk) 20:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
The page "Gopal Kundu Controvesy" of article "Scientific plagiarism in India" contains invalid information about him and the controversy, He is a former scientist who has registered patents and works at National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India. The page also refers to unofficial invalid sources. I request you to check official website of NCCS,Pune,India which is a Indian government body. the URL is www.nccs.res.in/gck.html. Please consider this request because it affects his reputation.
Thanks. Shrikantbhalerao101 ( talk) 12:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I removed the retraction section from Gilles J. Guillemin, as it does not appear to been covered in reliable secondary sources. Sourcing for contentious material in a biography of a living person must meet a high level of sourcing. While the retraction itself is a reliable source, it is primary. I did look for a secondary source, and did not find one. Russ Woodroofe ( talk) 14:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Belbernard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
{{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —I noticed that you've put your user page into various categories. However, user pages shouldn't be in categories like this: see WP:CATEGORY#User_namespace. You might be better off using userboxes on your userpage instead, such as:
![]() | This user is an engineer. |
![]() | This user comes from France. |
There are many other user-boxes around - if you look at other people's user pages, you may see others you like. If you have any questions about this, or anything else on WP, please get in touch, and I'll try to help. Best wishes, Bencherlite 17:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I reverted the case you added. For such a serious claim as plagiarism to be included, it must be supported by rock-solid reliable sources. Fences& Windows 01:07, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
I included it again with the proper references, notably Notices of the American Mathematical Society 54(4) (2007) p. 472. Bernard Bel ( talk) 20:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
The page "Gopal Kundu Controvesy" of article "Scientific plagiarism in India" contains invalid information about him and the controversy, He is a former scientist who has registered patents and works at National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India. The page also refers to unofficial invalid sources. I request you to check official website of NCCS,Pune,India which is a Indian government body. the URL is www.nccs.res.in/gck.html. Please consider this request because it affects his reputation.
Thanks. Shrikantbhalerao101 ( talk) 12:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I removed the retraction section from Gilles J. Guillemin, as it does not appear to been covered in reliable secondary sources. Sourcing for contentious material in a biography of a living person must meet a high level of sourcing. While the retraction itself is a reliable source, it is primary. I did look for a secondary source, and did not find one. Russ Woodroofe ( talk) 14:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)