Roman catholic archdiocese of goa was once eastablished by Apostle Bartholomew I have submitted reference for that how could you delete my input with the proof submitted thereon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spmunshi ( talk • contribs) 20:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Bealtainemí, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR ( talk) 16:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your reply on the Christianity noticeboard, and I’m afraid I unfortunately used you as an example of the types of problems trying to create a uniform guideline of the Roman Catholic vs. Catholic usage in prose would create: I wasn’t advocating for any particular result concerning the various sui iuris churches in South Asia, but you rushed in pretty aggressively without considering the broader point being made that there are some regions where Roman can have a variety of meanings and that each article needs to evaluate whether the usage is appropriate in context. I certainly understand your point of view, but if you are going to be editing more in the Eastern Christianity topic area, I really would suggest approaching ever dispute with the idea that most people aren’t making stuff up, and realizing that Eastern Christianity is a complex subject matter made even more complex in many situations by various national and ethnic conflicts. It doesn’t mean that you can’t advocate for your understanding, but that it’d be more helpful to forming consensus on various matters if there was an acknowledgement that many of the viewpoints regarding Eastern Christianity are not mutually exclusive.
Anyway, a belated welcome to Wikipedia, and if you have any questions or need an admin to do something, feel free to drop me a note on my talk. TonyBallioni ( talk) 07:33, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Anglican Use shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Iloilo Wanderer ( talk) 14:25, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Bealtainemí. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I have successfully petitioned WP:RFPP for semi-protection on four articles affected by unsourced additions. This had the effect of barring my own edits there; I was unwilling to engage in more edit-warring anyway. You may want to review two edits: here and here. Protection will continue for one week. I have dropped a few warnings on user talk pages, so if it picks up again, we can pursue administrative action. Thanks! 2600:8800:1880:9A3:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 ( talk) 04:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
For your vigilant defense against the inclusion of non-catholic POV sources on the 'Tridentine Mass' article, as well as many others. May God repay your effort.
Zmalsberg ( talk) 05:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC) in response to Ten Commandment hypocrisy and the comment, " Wikipedia is not a forum or blog for own comments: what is inserted here must be from already published sources that treat of the Tridentine Mass, not other matters. Read WP:V, WP:OR." Bealtainemí ( talk) 07:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
In short, I am not completely sure, and so if you want to remove mention of the Met Gala, I will not oppose you, even though I added it in to begin with. I am of the opinion that traditionalist Catholics were among those who criticized the Met Gala exhibit, and probably most non-traditionalist Catholics would be offended too. The main group supporting it would be the more liberal-aligning dissident Catholic groups. So in a way it falls into the typical traditionalist vs. more liberal paradigm of feuding issues. Removing it helps to simplify the article as it is a tertiary issue, but incorporating it broadens the traditionalist cause by pointing out one of their issues that many non-aligned Catholics would see as common sense. I looked for pictures of it on Wikimedia Commons, and couldn't find any. As for the picture you removed, some weeks back I read a traditionalist's writing on how the picture offended him, but as I didn't reference it, I understand why you removed it.-- Epiphyllumlover ( talk) 17:27, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Words such as "separation" and "division" imply schism, as I noticed documented in {{ Infobox Christian denomination}}. So we need to be careful when new Church structures are erected while communion is maintained, such as in the case of the Ethiopian-Eritrean Catholic Churches. Since sui iuris means "self-governing" or autonomous, it is correct to speak of Pope Francis granting autonomy to the Eritrean Catholic Church, as distinct from the Ethiopian one. They did not go into schism; they are not divided or separated; they retain their Eucharistic and ecclesial communion. Words matter. Elizium23 ( talk) 06:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, when you get a chance, would you please take a look at your recent edit of Names and titles of God in the New Testament? There's a ref error I'm not sure how to fix. Thanks! Jessicapierce ( talk) 16:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Dear Bealtainemí, best regards. Before anything I want to thank you for your good work in Names and titles of God in the New Testament, I recognize that you have good writing skills. Recently You added: "There are also extant Jewish and possibly Jewish copies of the pre-Christian Bible from the late first or early second century and from the third century in which passages that in the Masoretic Text have the tetragrammaton have instead the complete word θεός or one of the nomina sacra κς and θς," referenced by this source Emanuel Tov, Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts Found in the Judean Desert (BRILL 2004), pp. 305−307. It is true that in this source there are 5 manuscripts from before the third century CE that have nomina sacra, but it is not specified that in replacement of the tetragrammaton. In the book of Esther it could not appear θεός in its complete form in place of tetragram, because this book does not have YHWH, except in acrostic. Thanks in advance, and apologize for my bad English. Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco ( talk) 05:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Nice to meet you, improving the psalms, hopefully together! Can you please put not so many changes in one edit, but one thing at a time, explaining that one thing? Makes it easier to follow, and - if needed - revert one thing. Do we have to differentiate editions of the Vulgate, perhaps, as we have Gotteslob (1975) and Gotteslob? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
I think the way forward here now that you have accepted that the article should not suppress the uses of Lucifer in the 1 Peter / hymn / bishop senses from the article is to restore the etymology section that you deleted and then fine-tune it. 16:48, 25 September 2019 (UTC) In ictu oculi ( talk) 15:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Please explain how I am in violation of treating wikipedia like a forum. I am genuinely writing true information about one of the biggest film producers. GriffinTGA ( talk) 12:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
This is not my idea, it is a person's life. I have cited my sources. GriffinTGA ( talk) 15:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
My apology! I was talking about something else I edited. I have not cited any sources, but I am Catholic and I know this is true. GriffinTGA ( talk) 21:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi Bealtainemí, I noticed you made several edits today changing "Episcopal Church" to "Episcopal Church USA". The consensus on Wikipedia is that, despite the existence of the redirects, we don't normally use the abbreviation "USA", see MOS:NOTUSA. It might be best to use one of the other redirects, for example: "the Episcopal Church (US)" or "the Episcopal Church (U.S.) (depending on any established use in the aritlce), or the main article name directly: "the Episcopal Church (United States)".
Also, if you are changing instances like these: [1] [2], that had "The" capitalized mid-sentence, and included in the link, could you fix them in accordance with MOS:THECAPS? I see you did that already on this edit: [3], but not the others. Thanks.
By the way, some of your edits didn't accomplish anything, because they only changed the hidden target of the link, which was a redirect to the same article, e.g.: [4], [5], [6].
I also noticed in a couple of cases you make mistakes that damaged the article: [7], [8]. I've fixed those, but haven't changed the other edits. If you agree, maybe you could change those? Thanks. -- IamNotU ( talk) 19:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Dear User:Bealtainemí, thank you for your kind message. I'm sorry you were not able to receive my message, which did contain an Easter greeting, as well as a question about your thoughts on the above discussion (I noticed that you had changed this wikilink). Although I did not include this therein, I wish to ask you if you have more information about the indult granted to the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest to use the pre-1955 missal for Holy Week? I look forward to hearing from you. With regards, Anupam Talk 18:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Elizium23 ( talk) 18:19, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
So IPs from Brazil have been spamming "Sacred Catholic Church of the East of the Chaldeans" into innumerable articles lately, including anything related to East Syriac liturgy and monarchy/military commanders. Every once in a while an article on my watchlist pops up. Or I search for that exact term in quotes, because they keep choosing different articles. Right now, 2804:1B2:182:B099:15D9:460A:6CE5:8255 ( talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) is blocked, of course they are coming from random IPs so that's not helping much. Elizium23 ( talk) 21:50, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not "fix" or skip redirects which are not broken. The Episcopal Church is the main official name for the international church body based in the United States, and it is widely known as such. Jonathunder ( talk) 16:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
According to the Anglican Communion's website, they recognize "The Scottish Episcopal Church" and "The Episcopal Church" as such. Jonathunder ( talk) 19:03, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
It is correct the the episcopal church of north america is simply known as The Episcopal Church Spmunshi ( talk) 20:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
His grammar seems remarkably precise when contributing large chunks of text to articles, but not so much when he posts on talk pages. Do you have access to these books he's citing? I'd check for plagiarism. Elizium23 ( talk) 15:38, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catholicos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardinal ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
I just reverted your most recent edit re: the Didache. If you care to take the matter up with me then please do so on the talk page section titled: " Doxology in the Didache: Early or Earliest?" I won't be watching this page. Thanks.-- Mox La Push ( talk) 07:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello Bealtenemí, I considered it necessary to request a third opinion due to our active talk. Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Names and titles of God in the New Testament. Thank you. Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco ( talk) 21:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ad orientem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Buchanan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
You have never edited the article about the Breviary, but shortly after I did, you started nickel-and-diming the article. I would like to assume good faith, but it appears that you are following my edits. Could you kindly clarify your recent editing behaviour? If you have made a mistake, I would ask that you kindly please cease this activity and focus your efforts elsewhere. Thank you, Anupam Talk 14:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
This Bealtainemí is a troll and he is basically a nestorian who basically alters each and everyone's information so Anupam just ignore him Spmunshi ( talk) 15:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Apostle Bartholomew preached on goa, Maharashtra and karnataka then why remove that part inspite of reference being submitted Spmunshi ( talk) 20:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, check the talk page for Alqosh. 3Oh Hexelon ( talk) 16:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaldean Catholics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC) A footnote drawing attention to the existence of the disambiguation. Bealtainemí ( talk) 08:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chaldean Catholics; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. I've reverted back to your version, solely because it was the last stable version Ghinga7 ( talk) 19:45, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Bealtainemi; you raise some good questions 'bout this. I think Gesenius' use of multi is not too dissimilar to plerique as both words do mean "many" as opposed to a significant difference between most/many. I also don't think Gesenius completely dismisses the arguments of those who were favouring Jehovah as opposed to the other two. His section on Yaho/Yahweh (576 II. - 578) is also just a repetition of the arguments found in the Reland book as well. Gesenius looks to be in his last Thesaurus to be joining the many more commentators of his time who were starting to favour Yaho/Yahweh over Jehovah, but I don't find anything where he specifically states that he personally favoured/preferred/supported one over the other, at least not when it came to Yaho/Yahweh. Preferably next year I'd like to translate this section from Gesenius' Thesaurus to get a better picture. :) Stephen Walch ( talk) 13:55, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
{{Hebrew|יְהוָֺה}}
. You can type it directly into Wiki, but I find it easier to see using a proper font on MS word. :)
Stephen Walch (
talk) 11:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GeneralNotability (
talk) 20:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)חטאות נעורי ופשׁעי אל־תזכר - Delicta iuventutis meae et ignorantias meas ne memineris Years ago, I transgressed on Wikipedia. When this had been cleared up, accusations by some who disliked my questioning the grounds they gave on Wikipedia for a certain belief got me condemned as unforgivable. Still unforgivable? Bealtainemí ( talk) 11:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
@ GeneralNotability:, @ Elizium23: there appear to be other suspects [9] [10] [11].-- Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco ( talk) 09:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The Half Barnstar | |
For attempting to be a good-faith editor albeit with a checkered past. Elizium23 ( talk) 19:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC) |
Roman catholic archdiocese of goa was once eastablished by Apostle Bartholomew I have submitted reference for that how could you delete my input with the proof submitted thereon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spmunshi ( talk • contribs) 20:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Bealtainemí, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR ( talk) 16:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your reply on the Christianity noticeboard, and I’m afraid I unfortunately used you as an example of the types of problems trying to create a uniform guideline of the Roman Catholic vs. Catholic usage in prose would create: I wasn’t advocating for any particular result concerning the various sui iuris churches in South Asia, but you rushed in pretty aggressively without considering the broader point being made that there are some regions where Roman can have a variety of meanings and that each article needs to evaluate whether the usage is appropriate in context. I certainly understand your point of view, but if you are going to be editing more in the Eastern Christianity topic area, I really would suggest approaching ever dispute with the idea that most people aren’t making stuff up, and realizing that Eastern Christianity is a complex subject matter made even more complex in many situations by various national and ethnic conflicts. It doesn’t mean that you can’t advocate for your understanding, but that it’d be more helpful to forming consensus on various matters if there was an acknowledgement that many of the viewpoints regarding Eastern Christianity are not mutually exclusive.
Anyway, a belated welcome to Wikipedia, and if you have any questions or need an admin to do something, feel free to drop me a note on my talk. TonyBallioni ( talk) 07:33, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Anglican Use shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Iloilo Wanderer ( talk) 14:25, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Bealtainemí. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I have successfully petitioned WP:RFPP for semi-protection on four articles affected by unsourced additions. This had the effect of barring my own edits there; I was unwilling to engage in more edit-warring anyway. You may want to review two edits: here and here. Protection will continue for one week. I have dropped a few warnings on user talk pages, so if it picks up again, we can pursue administrative action. Thanks! 2600:8800:1880:9A3:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 ( talk) 04:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
For your vigilant defense against the inclusion of non-catholic POV sources on the 'Tridentine Mass' article, as well as many others. May God repay your effort.
Zmalsberg ( talk) 05:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC) in response to Ten Commandment hypocrisy and the comment, " Wikipedia is not a forum or blog for own comments: what is inserted here must be from already published sources that treat of the Tridentine Mass, not other matters. Read WP:V, WP:OR." Bealtainemí ( talk) 07:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
In short, I am not completely sure, and so if you want to remove mention of the Met Gala, I will not oppose you, even though I added it in to begin with. I am of the opinion that traditionalist Catholics were among those who criticized the Met Gala exhibit, and probably most non-traditionalist Catholics would be offended too. The main group supporting it would be the more liberal-aligning dissident Catholic groups. So in a way it falls into the typical traditionalist vs. more liberal paradigm of feuding issues. Removing it helps to simplify the article as it is a tertiary issue, but incorporating it broadens the traditionalist cause by pointing out one of their issues that many non-aligned Catholics would see as common sense. I looked for pictures of it on Wikimedia Commons, and couldn't find any. As for the picture you removed, some weeks back I read a traditionalist's writing on how the picture offended him, but as I didn't reference it, I understand why you removed it.-- Epiphyllumlover ( talk) 17:27, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Words such as "separation" and "division" imply schism, as I noticed documented in {{ Infobox Christian denomination}}. So we need to be careful when new Church structures are erected while communion is maintained, such as in the case of the Ethiopian-Eritrean Catholic Churches. Since sui iuris means "self-governing" or autonomous, it is correct to speak of Pope Francis granting autonomy to the Eritrean Catholic Church, as distinct from the Ethiopian one. They did not go into schism; they are not divided or separated; they retain their Eucharistic and ecclesial communion. Words matter. Elizium23 ( talk) 06:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, when you get a chance, would you please take a look at your recent edit of Names and titles of God in the New Testament? There's a ref error I'm not sure how to fix. Thanks! Jessicapierce ( talk) 16:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Dear Bealtainemí, best regards. Before anything I want to thank you for your good work in Names and titles of God in the New Testament, I recognize that you have good writing skills. Recently You added: "There are also extant Jewish and possibly Jewish copies of the pre-Christian Bible from the late first or early second century and from the third century in which passages that in the Masoretic Text have the tetragrammaton have instead the complete word θεός or one of the nomina sacra κς and θς," referenced by this source Emanuel Tov, Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts Found in the Judean Desert (BRILL 2004), pp. 305−307. It is true that in this source there are 5 manuscripts from before the third century CE that have nomina sacra, but it is not specified that in replacement of the tetragrammaton. In the book of Esther it could not appear θεός in its complete form in place of tetragram, because this book does not have YHWH, except in acrostic. Thanks in advance, and apologize for my bad English. Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco ( talk) 05:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Nice to meet you, improving the psalms, hopefully together! Can you please put not so many changes in one edit, but one thing at a time, explaining that one thing? Makes it easier to follow, and - if needed - revert one thing. Do we have to differentiate editions of the Vulgate, perhaps, as we have Gotteslob (1975) and Gotteslob? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
I think the way forward here now that you have accepted that the article should not suppress the uses of Lucifer in the 1 Peter / hymn / bishop senses from the article is to restore the etymology section that you deleted and then fine-tune it. 16:48, 25 September 2019 (UTC) In ictu oculi ( talk) 15:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Please explain how I am in violation of treating wikipedia like a forum. I am genuinely writing true information about one of the biggest film producers. GriffinTGA ( talk) 12:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
This is not my idea, it is a person's life. I have cited my sources. GriffinTGA ( talk) 15:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
My apology! I was talking about something else I edited. I have not cited any sources, but I am Catholic and I know this is true. GriffinTGA ( talk) 21:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi Bealtainemí, I noticed you made several edits today changing "Episcopal Church" to "Episcopal Church USA". The consensus on Wikipedia is that, despite the existence of the redirects, we don't normally use the abbreviation "USA", see MOS:NOTUSA. It might be best to use one of the other redirects, for example: "the Episcopal Church (US)" or "the Episcopal Church (U.S.) (depending on any established use in the aritlce), or the main article name directly: "the Episcopal Church (United States)".
Also, if you are changing instances like these: [1] [2], that had "The" capitalized mid-sentence, and included in the link, could you fix them in accordance with MOS:THECAPS? I see you did that already on this edit: [3], but not the others. Thanks.
By the way, some of your edits didn't accomplish anything, because they only changed the hidden target of the link, which was a redirect to the same article, e.g.: [4], [5], [6].
I also noticed in a couple of cases you make mistakes that damaged the article: [7], [8]. I've fixed those, but haven't changed the other edits. If you agree, maybe you could change those? Thanks. -- IamNotU ( talk) 19:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Dear User:Bealtainemí, thank you for your kind message. I'm sorry you were not able to receive my message, which did contain an Easter greeting, as well as a question about your thoughts on the above discussion (I noticed that you had changed this wikilink). Although I did not include this therein, I wish to ask you if you have more information about the indult granted to the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest to use the pre-1955 missal for Holy Week? I look forward to hearing from you. With regards, Anupam Talk 18:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Elizium23 ( talk) 18:19, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
So IPs from Brazil have been spamming "Sacred Catholic Church of the East of the Chaldeans" into innumerable articles lately, including anything related to East Syriac liturgy and monarchy/military commanders. Every once in a while an article on my watchlist pops up. Or I search for that exact term in quotes, because they keep choosing different articles. Right now, 2804:1B2:182:B099:15D9:460A:6CE5:8255 ( talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) is blocked, of course they are coming from random IPs so that's not helping much. Elizium23 ( talk) 21:50, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not "fix" or skip redirects which are not broken. The Episcopal Church is the main official name for the international church body based in the United States, and it is widely known as such. Jonathunder ( talk) 16:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
According to the Anglican Communion's website, they recognize "The Scottish Episcopal Church" and "The Episcopal Church" as such. Jonathunder ( talk) 19:03, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
It is correct the the episcopal church of north america is simply known as The Episcopal Church Spmunshi ( talk) 20:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
His grammar seems remarkably precise when contributing large chunks of text to articles, but not so much when he posts on talk pages. Do you have access to these books he's citing? I'd check for plagiarism. Elizium23 ( talk) 15:38, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catholicos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardinal ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
I just reverted your most recent edit re: the Didache. If you care to take the matter up with me then please do so on the talk page section titled: " Doxology in the Didache: Early or Earliest?" I won't be watching this page. Thanks.-- Mox La Push ( talk) 07:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello Bealtenemí, I considered it necessary to request a third opinion due to our active talk. Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Names and titles of God in the New Testament. Thank you. Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco ( talk) 21:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ad orientem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Buchanan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
You have never edited the article about the Breviary, but shortly after I did, you started nickel-and-diming the article. I would like to assume good faith, but it appears that you are following my edits. Could you kindly clarify your recent editing behaviour? If you have made a mistake, I would ask that you kindly please cease this activity and focus your efforts elsewhere. Thank you, Anupam Talk 14:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
This Bealtainemí is a troll and he is basically a nestorian who basically alters each and everyone's information so Anupam just ignore him Spmunshi ( talk) 15:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Apostle Bartholomew preached on goa, Maharashtra and karnataka then why remove that part inspite of reference being submitted Spmunshi ( talk) 20:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, check the talk page for Alqosh. 3Oh Hexelon ( talk) 16:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaldean Catholics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC) A footnote drawing attention to the existence of the disambiguation. Bealtainemí ( talk) 08:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chaldean Catholics; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. I've reverted back to your version, solely because it was the last stable version Ghinga7 ( talk) 19:45, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Bealtainemi; you raise some good questions 'bout this. I think Gesenius' use of multi is not too dissimilar to plerique as both words do mean "many" as opposed to a significant difference between most/many. I also don't think Gesenius completely dismisses the arguments of those who were favouring Jehovah as opposed to the other two. His section on Yaho/Yahweh (576 II. - 578) is also just a repetition of the arguments found in the Reland book as well. Gesenius looks to be in his last Thesaurus to be joining the many more commentators of his time who were starting to favour Yaho/Yahweh over Jehovah, but I don't find anything where he specifically states that he personally favoured/preferred/supported one over the other, at least not when it came to Yaho/Yahweh. Preferably next year I'd like to translate this section from Gesenius' Thesaurus to get a better picture. :) Stephen Walch ( talk) 13:55, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
{{Hebrew|יְהוָֺה}}
. You can type it directly into Wiki, but I find it easier to see using a proper font on MS word. :)
Stephen Walch (
talk) 11:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GeneralNotability (
talk) 20:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)חטאות נעורי ופשׁעי אל־תזכר - Delicta iuventutis meae et ignorantias meas ne memineris Years ago, I transgressed on Wikipedia. When this had been cleared up, accusations by some who disliked my questioning the grounds they gave on Wikipedia for a certain belief got me condemned as unforgivable. Still unforgivable? Bealtainemí ( talk) 11:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
@ GeneralNotability:, @ Elizium23: there appear to be other suspects [9] [10] [11].-- Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco ( talk) 09:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The Half Barnstar | |
For attempting to be a good-faith editor albeit with a checkered past. Elizium23 ( talk) 19:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC) |