Hi there. As you may have noticed, I have been working extensively on this article, so if you need a hand with helping to get it to FA status, feel free to ask me anything. PeeJay 18:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
The sources will exist so it's just a matter of finding them. But if anything the history section is too long. Admittedly our history has been more incidental than most, so you can justify it being a bit longer than most but if you look at Arsenal's page in particular you'll see what I mean. We have more on the pre-war section than they do on their history section... and pre-war they were more successful than us! I don't want to make sweeping changes because I've been here five minutes and haven't got the foggiest what the consensus is, but if you want to get featured status I think it needs addressing.
That doesn't mean to say "I don't want to change because of consensus, I'll leave it to you and let you take the wrap", but how would a massive change like condensing the history into five or six paragraphs be taken? I mean, there would still be the main history article (which in my opinion could possibly then be remerged into one article, but again my opinion isn't a consensus). BeL1EveR 21:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for attempting to reference the citation tag which was added by me to the above article. Unfortunately, your source does not answer the citation, due to Answers.com being a "Wikipedia mirror" parsing project i.e. some of the information contained on its servers is obtained verbatim from Wikipedia (and the Collina info certainly is - compare it). Therefore the referencing value 'implodes', I'm afraid. For this reason, I have reverted your recent edit. Thanks, and I hope the reliable source can eventually be found. Ref (chew) (do) 21:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Cheers for the support on the FAC! ChrisTheDude 13:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
As per your useful comments, I have added notes and changed the text for the 2005 estimate, updated house prices for 2006, and changed the Climate table on its Template page. Sorry about the slight delay - work! I've looked at the other figures too, and they also needed updated, so I did. Thanks for noticing that, I wouldn't have otherwise! Rossenglish 12:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments. We have made changes based upon them. Please can you visit the page to confirm if you support or oppose? Thanks, Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 14:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC).
Hey man, thanks for commenting on the Peer Review for this article. I really appreciated it. I have since added a couple of replies to your comment, and I now feel that the Peer Review has run its course. I will close it in a day or two, but if you wish to add another reply to it before then, please do so. - PeeJay 23:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Re: The section on the transfer saga took up more space than his actual playing history! Condensed to one paragraph and added a fact template. Well done! -- Alexf( t/ c) 15:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey, if an article appears to be an obvious redirect, go ahead and do it! You don't need to suggest a deletion for it. Don't worry, if you muck things up or someone gets angry, things can always be undone. I've redirected it, in this case. -- UsaSatsui 03:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
A month or so back, you made a comment when the Malaysia article was up for FA status, stating that it needed a copy-edit. I was wondering if you could give the article a copy-edit, as it is currently up for PR, and am preparing it for another stab at FA. Many thanks in advance, Davnel03 17:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
For a truly superb copy-edit. Hopefully we can work and get this article to FA. Thank you! Davnel03 19:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC) |
Please register your support (or oppose!). Davnel03 08:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I have requested that the List of nationality transfers in football (soccer), an article you proposed for deletion some time ago, be undeleted and sent to AFD. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 November 13#List of nationality transfers in football (soccer). A ecis Brievenbus 01:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there!
The userbox, User:Tyty1234/thug/highscore has changed. There are some variables that needed to put in instead of just a simple " | " after the userbox link. Anyway, if you want to change it and make it look better, view the documentation to follow how to fix the userbox.
Thank you.
Tyty1234 (
talk)
01:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, this is the first edition of the WP F1 newsletter. If you want to keep getting it, please talk back on my talk page.
Enjoy! LB22 ( talk) 11:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() Year I - Issue 1 - February 2008 | |
---|---|
"So to avoid any confusion, here is the order: Hakkinen leads and is yet to stop. Coulthard leads and is yet to stop..." -
Murray Walker | |
Hello, Reader! Welcome to our first monthly Formula 1 WP Newsletter. This is to give you the best source of information, right in your user talk page. We hope that you find this newsletter useful, and please leave me a message on this newsletter in my talk page. All that is left to say is, I hope that you enjoy the read! Enjoy! -- LB22 ( talk) 21:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | |
|
![]() |
|
Hi there. I noticed from the list of participants at WP:FOOTY that you are a Manchester United fan. A task force has been set up to help improve articles related to Manchester United, and we are looking for participants to help with the effort. If you would be interested, please add your name to the list at the task force's page. Thanks. – Pee Jay 10:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I'm not actually on the PR volunteers list, but I'll point out a few things anyway!
I hope that this helps, if you need any more feedback or want to discuss anything just let me know. I think it is definitely possible to take this article to GA status, but it needs more work yet. :) - Toon 05 20:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Long time since I spoke to you after our brief interactions on 2007 Malaysian Grand Prix nearly a year ago. Not a lot has actually happened regarding that article since then, still a fledgling GA-status article! However, I have been working on other Formula One race report articles, and recently the 1995 Japanese Grand Prix was promoted to FA-status! Anyway, good to see you back here on Wikipedia! =D D.M.N. (aka Davnel03) ( talk) 15:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Sure, are there any specific links you want me to have a look at? I'll do a search for articles on those subjects, but it'll have to wait until tomorrow. Regards, Tooga - BØRK! 20:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes, the idea of adding the showcase was one I'd been thinking of for a while, but I didn't want to get ahead of myself. I would suggest it at WT:MUFC, but the amount of participative interest in the project seems to have waned slightly. I'll just add it and see how we go. As for Bobby Charlton, I have his autobiography about the Manchester United years, so at least I have a bit of a base to work from. Just got to read it now :D – Pee Jay 21:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. As you may have noticed, I have been working extensively on this article, so if you need a hand with helping to get it to FA status, feel free to ask me anything. PeeJay 18:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
The sources will exist so it's just a matter of finding them. But if anything the history section is too long. Admittedly our history has been more incidental than most, so you can justify it being a bit longer than most but if you look at Arsenal's page in particular you'll see what I mean. We have more on the pre-war section than they do on their history section... and pre-war they were more successful than us! I don't want to make sweeping changes because I've been here five minutes and haven't got the foggiest what the consensus is, but if you want to get featured status I think it needs addressing.
That doesn't mean to say "I don't want to change because of consensus, I'll leave it to you and let you take the wrap", but how would a massive change like condensing the history into five or six paragraphs be taken? I mean, there would still be the main history article (which in my opinion could possibly then be remerged into one article, but again my opinion isn't a consensus). BeL1EveR 21:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for attempting to reference the citation tag which was added by me to the above article. Unfortunately, your source does not answer the citation, due to Answers.com being a "Wikipedia mirror" parsing project i.e. some of the information contained on its servers is obtained verbatim from Wikipedia (and the Collina info certainly is - compare it). Therefore the referencing value 'implodes', I'm afraid. For this reason, I have reverted your recent edit. Thanks, and I hope the reliable source can eventually be found. Ref (chew) (do) 21:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Cheers for the support on the FAC! ChrisTheDude 13:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
As per your useful comments, I have added notes and changed the text for the 2005 estimate, updated house prices for 2006, and changed the Climate table on its Template page. Sorry about the slight delay - work! I've looked at the other figures too, and they also needed updated, so I did. Thanks for noticing that, I wouldn't have otherwise! Rossenglish 12:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments. We have made changes based upon them. Please can you visit the page to confirm if you support or oppose? Thanks, Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 14:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC).
Hey man, thanks for commenting on the Peer Review for this article. I really appreciated it. I have since added a couple of replies to your comment, and I now feel that the Peer Review has run its course. I will close it in a day or two, but if you wish to add another reply to it before then, please do so. - PeeJay 23:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Re: The section on the transfer saga took up more space than his actual playing history! Condensed to one paragraph and added a fact template. Well done! -- Alexf( t/ c) 15:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey, if an article appears to be an obvious redirect, go ahead and do it! You don't need to suggest a deletion for it. Don't worry, if you muck things up or someone gets angry, things can always be undone. I've redirected it, in this case. -- UsaSatsui 03:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
A month or so back, you made a comment when the Malaysia article was up for FA status, stating that it needed a copy-edit. I was wondering if you could give the article a copy-edit, as it is currently up for PR, and am preparing it for another stab at FA. Many thanks in advance, Davnel03 17:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
For a truly superb copy-edit. Hopefully we can work and get this article to FA. Thank you! Davnel03 19:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC) |
Please register your support (or oppose!). Davnel03 08:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I have requested that the List of nationality transfers in football (soccer), an article you proposed for deletion some time ago, be undeleted and sent to AFD. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 November 13#List of nationality transfers in football (soccer). A ecis Brievenbus 01:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there!
The userbox, User:Tyty1234/thug/highscore has changed. There are some variables that needed to put in instead of just a simple " | " after the userbox link. Anyway, if you want to change it and make it look better, view the documentation to follow how to fix the userbox.
Thank you.
Tyty1234 (
talk)
01:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, this is the first edition of the WP F1 newsletter. If you want to keep getting it, please talk back on my talk page.
Enjoy! LB22 ( talk) 11:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() Year I - Issue 1 - February 2008 | |
---|---|
"So to avoid any confusion, here is the order: Hakkinen leads and is yet to stop. Coulthard leads and is yet to stop..." -
Murray Walker | |
Hello, Reader! Welcome to our first monthly Formula 1 WP Newsletter. This is to give you the best source of information, right in your user talk page. We hope that you find this newsletter useful, and please leave me a message on this newsletter in my talk page. All that is left to say is, I hope that you enjoy the read! Enjoy! -- LB22 ( talk) 21:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | |
|
![]() |
|
Hi there. I noticed from the list of participants at WP:FOOTY that you are a Manchester United fan. A task force has been set up to help improve articles related to Manchester United, and we are looking for participants to help with the effort. If you would be interested, please add your name to the list at the task force's page. Thanks. – Pee Jay 10:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I'm not actually on the PR volunteers list, but I'll point out a few things anyway!
I hope that this helps, if you need any more feedback or want to discuss anything just let me know. I think it is definitely possible to take this article to GA status, but it needs more work yet. :) - Toon 05 20:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Long time since I spoke to you after our brief interactions on 2007 Malaysian Grand Prix nearly a year ago. Not a lot has actually happened regarding that article since then, still a fledgling GA-status article! However, I have been working on other Formula One race report articles, and recently the 1995 Japanese Grand Prix was promoted to FA-status! Anyway, good to see you back here on Wikipedia! =D D.M.N. (aka Davnel03) ( talk) 15:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Sure, are there any specific links you want me to have a look at? I'll do a search for articles on those subjects, but it'll have to wait until tomorrow. Regards, Tooga - BØRK! 20:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes, the idea of adding the showcase was one I'd been thinking of for a while, but I didn't want to get ahead of myself. I would suggest it at WT:MUFC, but the amount of participative interest in the project seems to have waned slightly. I'll just add it and see how we go. As for Bobby Charlton, I have his autobiography about the Manchester United years, so at least I have a bit of a base to work from. Just got to read it now :D – Pee Jay 21:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)