From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a comment.

This is a response.
Another comment.-- Basatopa ( talk) 13:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Nomination of Nancy Pearlman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nancy Pearlman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Pearlman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bearcat ( talk) 18:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Nancy Pearlman was included on a Wikipedia page red list brought to our attention at a Women in Red editathon. This verifies that there is a want for a Wikipedia page about her work. Additionally, the awards she has received and the EMMY nominations are clear evidence that she has outside recognition for her work, warranting a page detailing her contributions. -- Basatopa ( talk) 19:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a comment.

This is a response.
Another comment.-- Basatopa ( talk) 13:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Nomination of Nancy Pearlman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nancy Pearlman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Pearlman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bearcat ( talk) 18:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Nancy Pearlman was included on a Wikipedia page red list brought to our attention at a Women in Red editathon. This verifies that there is a want for a Wikipedia page about her work. Additionally, the awards she has received and the EMMY nominations are clear evidence that she has outside recognition for her work, warranting a page detailing her contributions. -- Basatopa ( talk) 19:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook