Recent edit to Faith healing
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Faith healing, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Qzd (
talk) 04:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to
Faith healing. While
objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be
a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. -
Mr
X 04:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
|
Hi Banijelyn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC) |
Your recent editing history at Faith healing shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Mr X 23:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Look, I understand that it is clearly an emotional issue, but trying to armwrestle in content like this is not how we do things. You mention the organization CHILD. It already has a page at Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty, and the story is there too. There would be more notable sources. We try and discuss issues on the talk page. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 23:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Recent edit to Faith healing
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Faith healing, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Qzd (
talk) 04:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to
Faith healing. While
objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be
a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. -
Mr
X 04:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Banijelyn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC) |
Your recent editing history at Faith healing shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Mr X 23:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Look, I understand that it is clearly an emotional issue, but trying to armwrestle in content like this is not how we do things. You mention the organization CHILD. It already has a page at Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty, and the story is there too. There would be more notable sources. We try and discuss issues on the talk page. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 23:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)