Welcome!
Hello, Bakken, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Spencer
T♦
C
17:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
18:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
So you don't like the Higgs mechanism page. But I don't understand what you don't like, and you keep on putting in a standard-model specific version which is not satisfactory. Will you tell me what points you dislike in the current lead? Likebox ( talk) 18:51, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm assuming that by "condensate" everybody means an Einstein-Bose condensate? -- Michael C. Price talk 11:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
You seem to be implying that the particle formulation has to be constructed by expanding around the origin (Higgs =0). I think you'll find most folks expand around the vacuum, which removes the need to invoke an "imaginary mass". :-) -- Michael C. Price talk 12:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
I haven't been following Likebox's description, but I see the point you're making. I thought you were implying that the LHC Higgs would have imaginary mass. Since you're not, that's fine. -- Michael C. Price talk 13:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
22:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I can see that this discussion is degenerating, but I don't understand why we can't agree. What do you have against quarks as particles? The notion that "particle" includes quarks is very old by now. Likebox ( talk) 22:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I have nothing against your particle formulation, just leave alone and do not delete the generally accepted formulation from the Particle Data Group.-- Bakken ( talk) 23:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
11:30, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Zim-screenshot.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ankit Maity Talk • contribs 09:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Ankit Maity Talk • contribs 15:06, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Article :-
/info/en/?search=Feynman_diagram
Article is awesome, however as a lehman i observed some discrepancies, on on some on-line tutorials the x-axis of the Fayman Diagram is represented as space and the Y-axis as Time, on the Diagram over here in wiki its the reverse. Just want to clarify which one is the right approach since it will create doubt in my mind to understand the diagram itself if the diagram schematics are skewed. Since you were the biggest contributor for the article i thought of asking the question to you. Thanks Anish T. Anishtharagar ( talk) 12:46, 19 August 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Bakken, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Spencer
T♦
C
17:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
18:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
So you don't like the Higgs mechanism page. But I don't understand what you don't like, and you keep on putting in a standard-model specific version which is not satisfactory. Will you tell me what points you dislike in the current lead? Likebox ( talk) 18:51, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm assuming that by "condensate" everybody means an Einstein-Bose condensate? -- Michael C. Price talk 11:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
You seem to be implying that the particle formulation has to be constructed by expanding around the origin (Higgs =0). I think you'll find most folks expand around the vacuum, which removes the need to invoke an "imaginary mass". :-) -- Michael C. Price talk 12:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
I haven't been following Likebox's description, but I see the point you're making. I thought you were implying that the LHC Higgs would have imaginary mass. Since you're not, that's fine. -- Michael C. Price talk 13:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
22:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I can see that this discussion is degenerating, but I don't understand why we can't agree. What do you have against quarks as particles? The notion that "particle" includes quarks is very old by now. Likebox ( talk) 22:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I have nothing against your particle formulation, just leave alone and do not delete the generally accepted formulation from the Particle Data Group.-- Bakken ( talk) 23:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
11:30, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Zim-screenshot.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ankit Maity Talk • contribs 09:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Ankit Maity Talk • contribs 15:06, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Article :-
/info/en/?search=Feynman_diagram
Article is awesome, however as a lehman i observed some discrepancies, on on some on-line tutorials the x-axis of the Fayman Diagram is represented as space and the Y-axis as Time, on the Diagram over here in wiki its the reverse. Just want to clarify which one is the right approach since it will create doubt in my mind to understand the diagram itself if the diagram schematics are skewed. Since you were the biggest contributor for the article i thought of asking the question to you. Thanks Anish T. Anishtharagar ( talk) 12:46, 19 August 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)