There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Visnelma (
talk)
22:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ched. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to
User talk:Visnelma. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. It would be best if you toned down your future edits. The way you posted may come across as threats, or hate speech. Please be more careful.
— Ched (
talk) 22:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
— Ched (
talk)
22:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
331dot (
talk)
22:37, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Badi Bani ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please remove my block, 331dot are you here to 'support' everything what visnelma does or are you a real editor? This 'obsessed' user unfairly blocked me (and indefinitely?), and I want it to be removed. I haven't even done anything except noticing a user that the legal actions were taken about a subject that he contributed as well, not personally. I understood and agree everything what the editor 'Ched' wrote, so, I want this block to be removed Moreover, the blocking reason is 'legal threat', however, there is no 'legal threat' that I made in any case. I already applied to the Communication Department of the Presidency of Turkey with the application number: 2102187002, and they had already responded that they will take care of the respective article, I don't know what they will do exactly, but it is not my responsibility after this point. I only let them know about the one-sided, baseless claims about the Turkish War of Independence as a respectful citizen. However, even though I am wrong, or the article was 100% correct, this still doesn't explain why a single 'obsessed' user can block me INDEFINITELY just because I let the user, who also edited the respective article many times from an anti-Turkish side, that I made a complaint to the respective departments of my country. It is not a threat, as I said, I already applied and got a response from them. Isn't that unfair?
Decline reason:
Clear and blatant violation of WP:NLT. Your fundamental misunderstanding of WP:NLT fails to convince me you'll avoid all legal threats in the future. Additionally, your contributions reek of WP:BATTLEGROUND. Yamla ( talk) 11:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- @ Yamla and 331dot: I have revoked TP and email access per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bayramoviç since they are one and the same. Badi Bani, your only route to appeal is through WP:UTRS after having read the guide to appealing blocks. -- TheSandDoctor Talk 23:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Visnelma (
talk)
22:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ched. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to
User talk:Visnelma. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. It would be best if you toned down your future edits. The way you posted may come across as threats, or hate speech. Please be more careful.
— Ched (
talk) 22:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
— Ched (
talk)
22:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
331dot (
talk)
22:37, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Badi Bani ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please remove my block, 331dot are you here to 'support' everything what visnelma does or are you a real editor? This 'obsessed' user unfairly blocked me (and indefinitely?), and I want it to be removed. I haven't even done anything except noticing a user that the legal actions were taken about a subject that he contributed as well, not personally. I understood and agree everything what the editor 'Ched' wrote, so, I want this block to be removed Moreover, the blocking reason is 'legal threat', however, there is no 'legal threat' that I made in any case. I already applied to the Communication Department of the Presidency of Turkey with the application number: 2102187002, and they had already responded that they will take care of the respective article, I don't know what they will do exactly, but it is not my responsibility after this point. I only let them know about the one-sided, baseless claims about the Turkish War of Independence as a respectful citizen. However, even though I am wrong, or the article was 100% correct, this still doesn't explain why a single 'obsessed' user can block me INDEFINITELY just because I let the user, who also edited the respective article many times from an anti-Turkish side, that I made a complaint to the respective departments of my country. It is not a threat, as I said, I already applied and got a response from them. Isn't that unfair?
Decline reason:
Clear and blatant violation of WP:NLT. Your fundamental misunderstanding of WP:NLT fails to convince me you'll avoid all legal threats in the future. Additionally, your contributions reek of WP:BATTLEGROUND. Yamla ( talk) 11:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- @ Yamla and 331dot: I have revoked TP and email access per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bayramoviç since they are one and the same. Badi Bani, your only route to appeal is through WP:UTRS after having read the guide to appealing blocks. -- TheSandDoctor Talk 23:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)