Hello, Baba Arouj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR ( talk) 14:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
The sentence you've added in this edit is problematic in several ways:
Since the history and attribution of the model obviously merit coverage in the article, and the source appears to be a valuable addition, I would be grateful if you could correct these issues. -- JBL ( talk) 21:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Baba Arouj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR ( talk) 14:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
The sentence you've added in this edit is problematic in several ways:
Since the history and attribution of the model obviously merit coverage in the article, and the source appears to be a valuable addition, I would be grateful if you could correct these issues. -- JBL ( talk) 21:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)