This page is a chronological archive of past discussions from the
current talk page for the period November 2008.
In order to preserve the record of past discussions, the contents of this page should be preserved in their current form. Please do NOT make new edits to this page. If you wish to make new comments or re-open an old discussion thread, please do so on the current talk page. If necessary, copy the relevant discussion thread to the current talk page page and then add your comments there or preferably link to the section in question within the archives. |
↑
Index Pre-May 2008 manual archives
1 –
2 –
3 2009: J – F – M – A – M – J – J – A – S – O – N – D 2010: J – F – M – A – M – J – J – A – S – O – N – D |
Thanks for the revert to my talk page! DARTH PANDA talk 01:29, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Apologies in advance if WP:DRV is a better venue for this. How did you arrive at a merge for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google platform? Imo, the nominator didn't fully deal with any of the keep arguments put forth. Zain Ebrahim ( talk) 11:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
... the retirement consideration? Yngvarr (t) (c) 18:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
It might be a good idea not to close contested debates as a non-admin. I am referring at the moment to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nefarian Serpine. Not that your close was unreasonable at all, but still its not a good idea if there's dissent. I choose not to reopen it, as I would have the right to, because it would come--and ought to come-- to the same conclusion -- and in particular I do not wish to take admin actions on this general subject, let alone close debates on them. DGG ( talk) 23:43, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I agree that this user's conduct has been very questionable to put it lightly. The user does not seem to grasp that Wikipedia is built on consensus and it is clear that she does not understand (and has no intention of learning) many of Wikipedia's core policies and guidelines. The fact that she consistently ignores feedback given to her on her talk page seems to argue toward bad faith, as you pointed out. I'm not sure what to do about it though. Perhaps a WP:RfC is in order? What do you think? Thanks, 青い(Aoi) ( talk) 06:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
So, [2], and four minutes later, [3] by an IP who had no contributions for 24 hours prior (and none as of now). Who might this be? Yngvarr (t) (c) 21:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
But the season 3 of Squirrel Boy has announced by Cartoon Network. 201.92.171.100 ( talk) 17:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent report at AIV, however I have declined [4] your request that 201.92.171.100 ( talk · contribs) be blocked. As noted on WP:AIV, editors must be given sufficient recent warnings, and jumping straight to a level four warning without trying to communicate with the IP on why you are reverting them appears to be a textbook case of WP:BITE. I recognize that you are only trying to help keep Wikipedia clear of suspect information, but in the future please consider assuming good faith and use a {{ uw-unsourced1}} warning for first time offenders who may not be familiar with Wikipedia's rules. Thanks, Kralizec! ( talk) 20:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
This page is a chronological archive of past discussions from the
current talk page for the period November 2008.
In order to preserve the record of past discussions, the contents of this page should be preserved in their current form. Please do NOT make new edits to this page. If you wish to make new comments or re-open an old discussion thread, please do so on the current talk page. If necessary, copy the relevant discussion thread to the current talk page page and then add your comments there or preferably link to the section in question within the archives. |
↑
Index Pre-May 2008 manual archives
1 –
2 –
3 2009: J – F – M – A – M – J – J – A – S – O – N – D 2010: J – F – M – A – M – J – J – A – S – O – N – D |
Thanks for the revert to my talk page! DARTH PANDA talk 01:29, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Apologies in advance if WP:DRV is a better venue for this. How did you arrive at a merge for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google platform? Imo, the nominator didn't fully deal with any of the keep arguments put forth. Zain Ebrahim ( talk) 11:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
... the retirement consideration? Yngvarr (t) (c) 18:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
It might be a good idea not to close contested debates as a non-admin. I am referring at the moment to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nefarian Serpine. Not that your close was unreasonable at all, but still its not a good idea if there's dissent. I choose not to reopen it, as I would have the right to, because it would come--and ought to come-- to the same conclusion -- and in particular I do not wish to take admin actions on this general subject, let alone close debates on them. DGG ( talk) 23:43, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I agree that this user's conduct has been very questionable to put it lightly. The user does not seem to grasp that Wikipedia is built on consensus and it is clear that she does not understand (and has no intention of learning) many of Wikipedia's core policies and guidelines. The fact that she consistently ignores feedback given to her on her talk page seems to argue toward bad faith, as you pointed out. I'm not sure what to do about it though. Perhaps a WP:RfC is in order? What do you think? Thanks, 青い(Aoi) ( talk) 06:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
So, [2], and four minutes later, [3] by an IP who had no contributions for 24 hours prior (and none as of now). Who might this be? Yngvarr (t) (c) 21:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
But the season 3 of Squirrel Boy has announced by Cartoon Network. 201.92.171.100 ( talk) 17:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent report at AIV, however I have declined [4] your request that 201.92.171.100 ( talk · contribs) be blocked. As noted on WP:AIV, editors must be given sufficient recent warnings, and jumping straight to a level four warning without trying to communicate with the IP on why you are reverting them appears to be a textbook case of WP:BITE. I recognize that you are only trying to help keep Wikipedia clear of suspect information, but in the future please consider assuming good faith and use a {{ uw-unsourced1}} warning for first time offenders who may not be familiar with Wikipedia's rules. Thanks, Kralizec! ( talk) 20:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)