This page is a chronological archive of past discussions from the
current talk page for the period May 2008.
In order to preserve the record of past discussions, the contents of this page should be preserved in their current form. Please do NOT make new edits to this page. If you wish to make new comments or re-open an old discussion thread, please do so on the current talk page. If necessary, copy the relevant discussion thread to the current talk page page and then add your comments there or preferably link to the section in question within the archives. |
↑
Index Pre-May 2008 manual archives
1 –
2 –
3 2009: J – F – M – A – M – J – J – A – S – O – N – D 2010: J – F – M – A – M – J – J – A – S – O – N – D |
Please note the discussion at Template talk:Infobox Television#Consensus. An administrator has warned that flags be neither added nor removed from {{ Infobox television}} until the discussion on their role within that infobox has been resolved. Dl2000 ( talk) 01:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, this is my first tiime editing. I do not understand how it was not constructive. Especially with the example of the Breed standard and this history of the breed practices. BTCA mentions their breed order change, and BBCI should be listed as well, as it is the historical impetus for the change of breed practices for the BTCA. Is the absence of my putting a summary the reason the edit was reverted? I was unsure of where to put the summary or the reason for the edit. If I do that, will the edit be put back in place? Or is the entire thing whiped out? Just trying to do the right thing.
Treelo, I don't know who you are and why you are able to wipe out my edit. Perhaps you would be so kind to explain fo me so I can learn how to do this right.
thank you DogMommy ( talk) 20:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Treelo.
I just wanted to let you know that I declined your speedy deletion tag on
LG RUMOR, although I am not an admin.
CSD G1 (patent nonsense) is reserved for "unsalvageably incoherent" pages. You may want to read
WP:CSD throughly, I know that when I first started out fighting vandals, I made a lot of mistakes with speedy deletion tags, and I don't want you to do the same. Please do not take this note the wrong way, I just wanted to bring this to your attention. Thanks,
J.delanoy
gabs
adds
20:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to put a temporary block on 86.142.202.168 as he vandalised the page
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Melee
you may check the history of the page to see the vandalism
thanks for your concern —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Beedox (
talk •
contribs)
21:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Please don't leave drive-by tags on my talk page. The edit you reverted took a very clumsy wording and clarified it. If you have a problem with that, please improve rather than revert. -- Tom Ketchum 21:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Treelo, if you check, I simply removed a paragraph that was repetitive of a whole paragraph just a little way up the section, and that had no sources. This article is very long and unwieldy and we are trying to tighten it up while keeping it NPOV —Preceding unsigned comment added by Helen38 ( talk • contribs) 01:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Mr. Amok, if you don't restore my additions to the "hungarian language" article, i will make a complaint against you at the wikipedia administration. 82.131.210.162 ( talk) 09:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Treelo, I'd invite you to review an edit of mine on your talk page which you reverted and warned me for. It was a constructive edit about a user that you have been monitoring and some further minor vandalism conducted by that user. It appears I was a victim of this "huggle" application that you are using, and I was reverted and warned as being "unconstructive".
As you had previously expressed an interest in the user mentioned, and had placed warnings on their page to the effect that further vandalism would result in additional action, I assumed that you would be interested - if I was wrong in that assumption, I apologise. However I would also suggest that you look again at your use of Huggle, as from comments here it is clearly creating an amount of resentment among wikipedians. All the best. ColourSarge ( talk) 20:38, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
The Surreal Barnstar | ||
Poor Treelo, getting hammered at while learning the ins-and-outs of huggle; maybe this'll cheer you, and keep you at it. Yngvarr (c) 21:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC) |
Adding watermelon to C++ could be constructive? You people have too much good faith. Anyways, I was about to undo it (well, people rv in seconds so I didn't really have a chance, but still). Someone went off on that "Get from A to B" things, and I wished to display why such activities are fruitless 216.99.100.237 ( talk) / 23:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Are you a bot? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.161.5.146 ( talk) 23:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I did not mean to vandalize anything. I was just pointing out that some of the facts on that page is outdated, for example, the subject now blogs at evolvedrational.com instead of scientianatura.blogspot.com
Please let me know why this constitutes vandalism. Thanks.
Hey there, thank you for reverting that steady stream of vandalism to my talk page, it is very much appreciated. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 01:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Treelo, sorry for commenting here rather than on my talk page, but your comment there was removed pretty much the moment it was posted, so I'm not sure if you are watching it or not?
I'm a bit confused as to what happened on the Nelsons article. Another user deleted a big swathe of copy a few days ago, they had some valid points but I felt the wholesale deletion was an over the top response. Since then I've extensively re-written the article to address the points raised (both by that user and a previous editor), specifically to change copy so its not a direct (i.e copyright infringing) copy of a website and also to add refs to back up the copy. I think the article, while it could clearly do with some more work, is of sufficient quality to warrant being left in.
It looks like you reverted the article to the deleted version, but then reverted your own reversion. I've seen other comments about some issues with your system, is this one of them?
Thanks, -- ThePaintedOne ( talk) 11:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Treelo, I appreciate your trying to help, I am the owner of the Philips sites in UK, Ireland and South Africa and we do get lots of requests for such a UK map which I belive will add value to the wikipedia users who would like to find our company physically!
I appreciate your your personal opinion that it is an unconstructive edit, but unless we are violating a specific policy, I see no point of removing it promptly everytime we try to do some edits to this public page !
Could you please explain your reactions on the Philips page?
Special:Contributions/85.158.139.99 has requested on WP:ANI that your reverts be discussed. I do not see any reason why they should not, as the edits you have reverted do not reflect vandalism. Can you please explain that, and your reasons for not discussing it with 85.158.139.99? SynergeticMaggot ( talk) 12:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Can you double check the warning you left on this page regarding edits to 1449AM URB? They don't seem like vandalism to me. I think this editor has gotten at least 3 un-earned warnings today. Toddst1 ( talk) 13:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I assume you noticed I wasn't vandalism - I can see why you thought it was, no worries ;) 81.149.250.228 ( talk) 14:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For the amazing amount of vandalism that you've reverted AND for beating me to MANY reversions, I hereby award you this RickK Vandalism barnstar! Razor flame 13:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC) |
Why did you revert this seemingly good faith edit? Toddst1 ( talk) 13:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your help Toddst1. I think that Treelo responded with the vandalism slur because I tried to re-instate a graphic when I had not realised that it was being purposely removed by her...several times! (thought it was a software glitch or something). No hard feelings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oddben ( talk • contribs) 17:06, May 7, 2008
Hello Treelo & Toddst1 both. What is the outcome of this discussion? - Are you going to revert my edits? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oddben ( talk • contribs) 06:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
You reverted an edit of mine that was I believe was quite valid. When I requested you to explain, you then reverted my request saying it was vandalism. I don't understand what's going on. Please explain.-- 85.158.139.99 ( talk) 12:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits (Persons, who have been called resilient)? Those person have been called resilient. here is about Frank McCourt, here is about Dave Pelzer, here is about Mario Capecchi-- 77.10.108.22 ( talk) 12:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Depending on the job, I'm actually not a big fan of using automated tools. I have huggle (and VP, and others), but usually fall back to the old-skool way of doing it. It's harder, and a lot slower, but it also keeps me from getting that frazzled feeling. I know that feeling very well. One of the reasons I don't do recent changes patrol very often.
AWB has a tool called IRCMonitor, which allows you to view the RC changes, and it lets you review things a little differently than huggle. Another nice script is at User:TheJosh/Scripts. He has both RC and NP patrol scripts. Those are real hard-core old-skoll; you have to wait for the RC to update, then click the diff, then decide. In the meantime, someone else might have beaten you to it.
Anyways, the reasons I like to doing things the hard way is that I find myself learning more than I anticipated. Memorizing the UW warning templates, the CSD categories, etc. Yngvarr (c) 16:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Great job whacking those vandals TheDJAtClubRock :-) ( T/ C) 00:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC) |
Dear sir, I don't understand why you deleted my entry. I personally knew Charles I interviewed him when he arrived in Iloilo in the Philippines back in November of 2006 I have 5 interviews up on youtube that I did with him. Here is the link to one of those interviews: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGaZRgpeuVc He was a friend and a dear loss to me and my family. We were at his side when he died and accompanied his son to Bocholad for the cremation. His son then flew him back to the US where he is to be buried at Arlington Cemetery. Why I wasn't allowed to put his death notice up on Wikipedia I don't understand. Please advise Sincerely Jerry Lames —Preceding unsigned comment added by Islandjerry ( talk • contribs) 00:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
This section may contain information of unclear or questionable
importance or
relevance to the article's subject matter even after a explaination. Please help improve this article by clarifying further. Treating it like a Magic Eye picture may help with the confusion involved. |
O...K, context anyone? Please? Context. How about you Budda24, context? -- treelo talk 11:20, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Just FYI, I saw this [4], but it's not salted. It's created at List of Minor characters in My Gym PArtner's a Monkey, so I submitted to to CSD under G4, re-creation of previously deleted material. The only AFD I could find was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor characters in My Gym Partner's A Monkley, but that's a little on the oldish side, I could have thought there was more... Yngvarr (c) 23:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Gregory E. Miller (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thought you could use it. :) Gregory E. Miller ( talk) 13:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC))
I reviewed you. Sorry for the delay. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 04:30, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
You are editing so fast you are reverting edits that aren't vandalism.-- I LIVE IN A HAT ( talk) 10:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Treelo,
I spent a lot of time and thought on making some changes to the Alice Cooper article this morning. I am convinced that these changes represent a major improvement to the article. I note, however, that you have reversed them, and I was wondering what your justification for this was. I'm quite happy to discuss any points you might have in detail.
Best Wishes Jprw ( talk) 11:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I can't find any sign that this creator requested deletion of this page, as you tagged it here. He did remove his misplaced hangon content from the article, but placed a more expansive rationale on the talk page. Looking through his contribution history, I don't see anything else that I might interpret as a deletion request. I'm removing the tag for now on the presumption that its placement was an accident. If I'm missing an author request, please feel free to let me know. Thanks. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Per the mention above and again on The joy formidable. Can't find anything verifying this. Are you perhaps using a tool for this that is malfunctioning? Are we in someway missing the requests? Perhaps they were done by email or something? Jasynnash2 ( talk) 13:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. You have a box saying that you might accidentally delete good faith contributions and warn users for them, because you're using huggle. This is not acceptable. You must take responsibility for your edits. This means that you should apologise when you make mistakes (so well done there) but you should try to avoid amking those mistakes first. Dan Beale-Cocks 14:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
why did you report user "workinginpartnershipsprogram"? Please can you tell me which SPECIFIC part of policy they're violating? Did you notice that several editors were already talking to this editor? Did you consider asking this editor to change their name before you reported them? Dan Beale-Cocks 14:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Remind me who Colective is/was? I don't think it was KL lover. Yngvarr (c) 18:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
The Nothin' Barnstar | ||
For the countless undos done against the edit testers for seemingly minor reasons and continually shooting yourself and several others in the feet along with other limbs and body parts using the veritable scattergun we call Huggle I give to you the Nothin' barnstar for a job not really being done. treelo talk 20:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC) |
Who got all huffy? It just didn't make sense to me why you did that. But it wasn't like i was downing you because at least you reverted it. And i'll have to go back and check, but i'm not sure you're allowed to edit another user's talk page. Thanks, Terminator14 ( talk) 20:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Once again created a page for Ed, Edd n Eddy season 6, and moved the 2 disputed episodes there. I reverted and redirected, but he isn't going to let this alone. Fact is, though he doesn't really have any proof that they are season 6, we don't really have any that they aren't. This is touchy, which is why I have been handling it with kid gloves. I wish we had some way of finding out one way or the other. Suggestions are welcome, and I am going to email Animation By Mistake, and see if I can get an answer. -- Elaich talk 02:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Ah, recent activity has pushed me to the point where I just can't resist trolling your talkpage.
Yngvarr (c) 20:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
See the RFCU. You were right. I was always suspicious of him too. That's why I didn't go out of my way to help him. I've made sure all are blocked and tagged. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
The G7 tag for Victor I. Petrik was placed by Huggle in what I figure was supposed to be a simple revert due to the removal of the hangon tag so two for two there. Next up, The joy formidable. This was an issue to me and still is as it's just a bunch of links and again was a result of the tool.
I'm saying it's the tool because I'm not that unaware or working too fast to notice when someone didn't blank the article as a request for deletion but marks it as such anyway. Feh, I'm sticking to more manual means of CSD in the future. treelo talk 14:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Wow, this place has gotten so bad that I'm leaving for a long time. Goodbye! -- Particleman24 ( talk) 23:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi there Treelo, I went ahead and closed your RfA per WP:SNOW do to the fact that at this time it was clear that the community did not see it fit to place you in a administrative role. I recommend you do some of the fallowing things to improve your chances next time around:
Let me know you have any questions, or can be of any further help. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 16:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! --
TinuCherian
(Wanna Talk?) -
16:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I don't see how any one has a right to delete some ones work from here. Wikipedia is a Encyclopedia for people to gain knowledge about things in life, pop culture and things from around the world. The Wolf Hunter film it's self is a film that has lots of fans and supporters as does the character. I think just because its not as well known as Freddy or Jason does not mean it should not be on here. I have already seen that some one else has edited the article as well. I think that if this does go off its a shame and what kind of Encyclopedia for the people rob people from learning about films and characters from a independent film.
--bloodline video 06:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
This page is a chronological archive of past discussions from the
current talk page for the period May 2008.
In order to preserve the record of past discussions, the contents of this page should be preserved in their current form. Please do NOT make new edits to this page. If you wish to make new comments or re-open an old discussion thread, please do so on the current talk page. If necessary, copy the relevant discussion thread to the current talk page page and then add your comments there or preferably link to the section in question within the archives. |
↑
Index Pre-May 2008 manual archives
1 –
2 –
3 2009: J – F – M – A – M – J – J – A – S – O – N – D 2010: J – F – M – A – M – J – J – A – S – O – N – D |
Please note the discussion at Template talk:Infobox Television#Consensus. An administrator has warned that flags be neither added nor removed from {{ Infobox television}} until the discussion on their role within that infobox has been resolved. Dl2000 ( talk) 01:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, this is my first tiime editing. I do not understand how it was not constructive. Especially with the example of the Breed standard and this history of the breed practices. BTCA mentions their breed order change, and BBCI should be listed as well, as it is the historical impetus for the change of breed practices for the BTCA. Is the absence of my putting a summary the reason the edit was reverted? I was unsure of where to put the summary or the reason for the edit. If I do that, will the edit be put back in place? Or is the entire thing whiped out? Just trying to do the right thing.
Treelo, I don't know who you are and why you are able to wipe out my edit. Perhaps you would be so kind to explain fo me so I can learn how to do this right.
thank you DogMommy ( talk) 20:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Treelo.
I just wanted to let you know that I declined your speedy deletion tag on
LG RUMOR, although I am not an admin.
CSD G1 (patent nonsense) is reserved for "unsalvageably incoherent" pages. You may want to read
WP:CSD throughly, I know that when I first started out fighting vandals, I made a lot of mistakes with speedy deletion tags, and I don't want you to do the same. Please do not take this note the wrong way, I just wanted to bring this to your attention. Thanks,
J.delanoy
gabs
adds
20:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to put a temporary block on 86.142.202.168 as he vandalised the page
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Melee
you may check the history of the page to see the vandalism
thanks for your concern —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Beedox (
talk •
contribs)
21:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Please don't leave drive-by tags on my talk page. The edit you reverted took a very clumsy wording and clarified it. If you have a problem with that, please improve rather than revert. -- Tom Ketchum 21:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Treelo, if you check, I simply removed a paragraph that was repetitive of a whole paragraph just a little way up the section, and that had no sources. This article is very long and unwieldy and we are trying to tighten it up while keeping it NPOV —Preceding unsigned comment added by Helen38 ( talk • contribs) 01:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Mr. Amok, if you don't restore my additions to the "hungarian language" article, i will make a complaint against you at the wikipedia administration. 82.131.210.162 ( talk) 09:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Treelo, I'd invite you to review an edit of mine on your talk page which you reverted and warned me for. It was a constructive edit about a user that you have been monitoring and some further minor vandalism conducted by that user. It appears I was a victim of this "huggle" application that you are using, and I was reverted and warned as being "unconstructive".
As you had previously expressed an interest in the user mentioned, and had placed warnings on their page to the effect that further vandalism would result in additional action, I assumed that you would be interested - if I was wrong in that assumption, I apologise. However I would also suggest that you look again at your use of Huggle, as from comments here it is clearly creating an amount of resentment among wikipedians. All the best. ColourSarge ( talk) 20:38, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
The Surreal Barnstar | ||
Poor Treelo, getting hammered at while learning the ins-and-outs of huggle; maybe this'll cheer you, and keep you at it. Yngvarr (c) 21:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC) |
Adding watermelon to C++ could be constructive? You people have too much good faith. Anyways, I was about to undo it (well, people rv in seconds so I didn't really have a chance, but still). Someone went off on that "Get from A to B" things, and I wished to display why such activities are fruitless 216.99.100.237 ( talk) / 23:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Are you a bot? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.161.5.146 ( talk) 23:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I did not mean to vandalize anything. I was just pointing out that some of the facts on that page is outdated, for example, the subject now blogs at evolvedrational.com instead of scientianatura.blogspot.com
Please let me know why this constitutes vandalism. Thanks.
Hey there, thank you for reverting that steady stream of vandalism to my talk page, it is very much appreciated. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 01:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Treelo, sorry for commenting here rather than on my talk page, but your comment there was removed pretty much the moment it was posted, so I'm not sure if you are watching it or not?
I'm a bit confused as to what happened on the Nelsons article. Another user deleted a big swathe of copy a few days ago, they had some valid points but I felt the wholesale deletion was an over the top response. Since then I've extensively re-written the article to address the points raised (both by that user and a previous editor), specifically to change copy so its not a direct (i.e copyright infringing) copy of a website and also to add refs to back up the copy. I think the article, while it could clearly do with some more work, is of sufficient quality to warrant being left in.
It looks like you reverted the article to the deleted version, but then reverted your own reversion. I've seen other comments about some issues with your system, is this one of them?
Thanks, -- ThePaintedOne ( talk) 11:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Treelo, I appreciate your trying to help, I am the owner of the Philips sites in UK, Ireland and South Africa and we do get lots of requests for such a UK map which I belive will add value to the wikipedia users who would like to find our company physically!
I appreciate your your personal opinion that it is an unconstructive edit, but unless we are violating a specific policy, I see no point of removing it promptly everytime we try to do some edits to this public page !
Could you please explain your reactions on the Philips page?
Special:Contributions/85.158.139.99 has requested on WP:ANI that your reverts be discussed. I do not see any reason why they should not, as the edits you have reverted do not reflect vandalism. Can you please explain that, and your reasons for not discussing it with 85.158.139.99? SynergeticMaggot ( talk) 12:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Can you double check the warning you left on this page regarding edits to 1449AM URB? They don't seem like vandalism to me. I think this editor has gotten at least 3 un-earned warnings today. Toddst1 ( talk) 13:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I assume you noticed I wasn't vandalism - I can see why you thought it was, no worries ;) 81.149.250.228 ( talk) 14:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For the amazing amount of vandalism that you've reverted AND for beating me to MANY reversions, I hereby award you this RickK Vandalism barnstar! Razor flame 13:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC) |
Why did you revert this seemingly good faith edit? Toddst1 ( talk) 13:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your help Toddst1. I think that Treelo responded with the vandalism slur because I tried to re-instate a graphic when I had not realised that it was being purposely removed by her...several times! (thought it was a software glitch or something). No hard feelings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oddben ( talk • contribs) 17:06, May 7, 2008
Hello Treelo & Toddst1 both. What is the outcome of this discussion? - Are you going to revert my edits? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oddben ( talk • contribs) 06:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
You reverted an edit of mine that was I believe was quite valid. When I requested you to explain, you then reverted my request saying it was vandalism. I don't understand what's going on. Please explain.-- 85.158.139.99 ( talk) 12:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits (Persons, who have been called resilient)? Those person have been called resilient. here is about Frank McCourt, here is about Dave Pelzer, here is about Mario Capecchi-- 77.10.108.22 ( talk) 12:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Depending on the job, I'm actually not a big fan of using automated tools. I have huggle (and VP, and others), but usually fall back to the old-skool way of doing it. It's harder, and a lot slower, but it also keeps me from getting that frazzled feeling. I know that feeling very well. One of the reasons I don't do recent changes patrol very often.
AWB has a tool called IRCMonitor, which allows you to view the RC changes, and it lets you review things a little differently than huggle. Another nice script is at User:TheJosh/Scripts. He has both RC and NP patrol scripts. Those are real hard-core old-skoll; you have to wait for the RC to update, then click the diff, then decide. In the meantime, someone else might have beaten you to it.
Anyways, the reasons I like to doing things the hard way is that I find myself learning more than I anticipated. Memorizing the UW warning templates, the CSD categories, etc. Yngvarr (c) 16:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Great job whacking those vandals TheDJAtClubRock :-) ( T/ C) 00:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC) |
Dear sir, I don't understand why you deleted my entry. I personally knew Charles I interviewed him when he arrived in Iloilo in the Philippines back in November of 2006 I have 5 interviews up on youtube that I did with him. Here is the link to one of those interviews: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGaZRgpeuVc He was a friend and a dear loss to me and my family. We were at his side when he died and accompanied his son to Bocholad for the cremation. His son then flew him back to the US where he is to be buried at Arlington Cemetery. Why I wasn't allowed to put his death notice up on Wikipedia I don't understand. Please advise Sincerely Jerry Lames —Preceding unsigned comment added by Islandjerry ( talk • contribs) 00:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
This section may contain information of unclear or questionable
importance or
relevance to the article's subject matter even after a explaination. Please help improve this article by clarifying further. Treating it like a Magic Eye picture may help with the confusion involved. |
O...K, context anyone? Please? Context. How about you Budda24, context? -- treelo talk 11:20, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Just FYI, I saw this [4], but it's not salted. It's created at List of Minor characters in My Gym PArtner's a Monkey, so I submitted to to CSD under G4, re-creation of previously deleted material. The only AFD I could find was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor characters in My Gym Partner's A Monkley, but that's a little on the oldish side, I could have thought there was more... Yngvarr (c) 23:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Gregory E. Miller (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thought you could use it. :) Gregory E. Miller ( talk) 13:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC))
I reviewed you. Sorry for the delay. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 04:30, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
You are editing so fast you are reverting edits that aren't vandalism.-- I LIVE IN A HAT ( talk) 10:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Treelo,
I spent a lot of time and thought on making some changes to the Alice Cooper article this morning. I am convinced that these changes represent a major improvement to the article. I note, however, that you have reversed them, and I was wondering what your justification for this was. I'm quite happy to discuss any points you might have in detail.
Best Wishes Jprw ( talk) 11:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I can't find any sign that this creator requested deletion of this page, as you tagged it here. He did remove his misplaced hangon content from the article, but placed a more expansive rationale on the talk page. Looking through his contribution history, I don't see anything else that I might interpret as a deletion request. I'm removing the tag for now on the presumption that its placement was an accident. If I'm missing an author request, please feel free to let me know. Thanks. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Per the mention above and again on The joy formidable. Can't find anything verifying this. Are you perhaps using a tool for this that is malfunctioning? Are we in someway missing the requests? Perhaps they were done by email or something? Jasynnash2 ( talk) 13:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. You have a box saying that you might accidentally delete good faith contributions and warn users for them, because you're using huggle. This is not acceptable. You must take responsibility for your edits. This means that you should apologise when you make mistakes (so well done there) but you should try to avoid amking those mistakes first. Dan Beale-Cocks 14:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
why did you report user "workinginpartnershipsprogram"? Please can you tell me which SPECIFIC part of policy they're violating? Did you notice that several editors were already talking to this editor? Did you consider asking this editor to change their name before you reported them? Dan Beale-Cocks 14:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Remind me who Colective is/was? I don't think it was KL lover. Yngvarr (c) 18:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
The Nothin' Barnstar | ||
For the countless undos done against the edit testers for seemingly minor reasons and continually shooting yourself and several others in the feet along with other limbs and body parts using the veritable scattergun we call Huggle I give to you the Nothin' barnstar for a job not really being done. treelo talk 20:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC) |
Who got all huffy? It just didn't make sense to me why you did that. But it wasn't like i was downing you because at least you reverted it. And i'll have to go back and check, but i'm not sure you're allowed to edit another user's talk page. Thanks, Terminator14 ( talk) 20:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Once again created a page for Ed, Edd n Eddy season 6, and moved the 2 disputed episodes there. I reverted and redirected, but he isn't going to let this alone. Fact is, though he doesn't really have any proof that they are season 6, we don't really have any that they aren't. This is touchy, which is why I have been handling it with kid gloves. I wish we had some way of finding out one way or the other. Suggestions are welcome, and I am going to email Animation By Mistake, and see if I can get an answer. -- Elaich talk 02:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Ah, recent activity has pushed me to the point where I just can't resist trolling your talkpage.
Yngvarr (c) 20:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
See the RFCU. You were right. I was always suspicious of him too. That's why I didn't go out of my way to help him. I've made sure all are blocked and tagged. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
The G7 tag for Victor I. Petrik was placed by Huggle in what I figure was supposed to be a simple revert due to the removal of the hangon tag so two for two there. Next up, The joy formidable. This was an issue to me and still is as it's just a bunch of links and again was a result of the tool.
I'm saying it's the tool because I'm not that unaware or working too fast to notice when someone didn't blank the article as a request for deletion but marks it as such anyway. Feh, I'm sticking to more manual means of CSD in the future. treelo talk 14:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Wow, this place has gotten so bad that I'm leaving for a long time. Goodbye! -- Particleman24 ( talk) 23:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi there Treelo, I went ahead and closed your RfA per WP:SNOW do to the fact that at this time it was clear that the community did not see it fit to place you in a administrative role. I recommend you do some of the fallowing things to improve your chances next time around:
Let me know you have any questions, or can be of any further help. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 16:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! --
TinuCherian
(Wanna Talk?) -
16:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I don't see how any one has a right to delete some ones work from here. Wikipedia is a Encyclopedia for people to gain knowledge about things in life, pop culture and things from around the world. The Wolf Hunter film it's self is a film that has lots of fans and supporters as does the character. I think just because its not as well known as Freddy or Jason does not mean it should not be on here. I have already seen that some one else has edited the article as well. I think that if this does go off its a shame and what kind of Encyclopedia for the people rob people from learning about films and characters from a independent film.
--bloodline video 06:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)