![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. BM has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I am archiving this Talk page by blanking it periodically. In order to facilitate the reading of old conversations, here are pointers to the versions in the page history just before each blanking of the page:
Inevitably, I suppose, our opinionated anon has started deleting my addition to the Pantheism article. I wonder if you'd like to look at it. Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 17:49, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It's been determined that 216.45.221.155 ( talk · contributions) is in fact Paul Vogel. I've banned 216.45.221.155 for an initial period of 24 hours until I can ascertain the proper procedure with an IP-address sockpuppet of a banned User. Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 21:15, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
BM, please don't recreate Smirking Chimp. I believe there's a vote going on. I don't know its current status but when I last checked, there had been no decision to recreate it. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:54, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
I feel that User:SlimVirgin has abused her administrative powers in both the Smirking Chimp redirect deletion and in several other situations. (For example, she once accused me of "vandalism" for making a page move that she personally disagreed with.) I feel that she is unable to separate her personal opinions from the use of her administrative powers. If this behavior continues, I am going to open a RFC on these actions. Since you have also had encounters with this administrator, I will notify you if this is done. Firebug 21:16, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
You might want to vote at Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion#April 13. Zocky 20:46, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I posted a follow up to a somewhat older message of your on the Achilles topic on Jimbo's talk page. No idea if I said anything you'll feel the need to reply to, but I just thought I'd let you know. Please feel free to delete this notice. -- Gmaxwell 21:46, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A new category has recently been formed which I believe to be rather unnecessary. I was interested in what your opinion on it might be. -- BaronLarf 15:46, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
I thought you might be interested in readng, and perhaps giving me your feedback on the following: [1] [2]
-- rrcaballo AT yahoo.com
I've never seen you deal with biography pages, but I know you have a level head from what I've seen of you on editing stuff like the atheism article. Anyway, there is currently a survey on style at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (biographies)/Survey on Style-Prefixed Honorary Titles and I'm pretty sure some level-headed input would be appreciated there, as most of us there are less than level-headed about the subject. Its currently a vote, and its looking like its going to come down pretty close to 50-50 on the matter, and I think that right now there really haven't been enough people (a little over 30) to really settle the matter, especially given how deep the split seems to be. Also, there have been some questions of impropriety, as to whether the vote is really "valid", though I think a great deal of that is because a few users are afraid the vote will go against them and didn't want it to be done at all, as well as others concerned with the issue of whether a vote really consitutes a consensus on the matter, especially when many people seem to be split very deeply. Anyway, I was just kind of trying to get the word out a bit because deciding Wikipedia policy on thousands of articles with 32 votes seems like it would be kind of messy. I'm pretty sure giving users messages is less than effective, but I can't really think of what else to do. Titanium Dragon 11:41, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
Brian, you are cordially invited to join the
Inquiry project.
Adraeus
10:36, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
Hiya,
you recently voted to delete John 20:16
Uncle G has made a wider proposal covering a much larger group of verses.
would you be prepared to make a similar vote at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Individual Bible verses, which covers the full list of verses in Uncle G's suggestion?
~~~~ 9 July 2005 16:39 (UTC)
I am trying to rename and move all images on the page to commons. I could move every image individualy but hope to find a faster and more fficent method. Cat chi? 13:03, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
I have already moved images of Turkey UK and US. Cat chi? 13:03, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
I come in one peice... Ne-ways whatcha upto being away this LONG? -- Cool Cat Talk| @ 21:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Francis Sant-Cassia. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Sant-Cassia (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Template:Said-Vassallo-Acknowledgement has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
09:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Intactivist. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 28#Intactivist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. --
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
01:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. BM has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I am archiving this Talk page by blanking it periodically. In order to facilitate the reading of old conversations, here are pointers to the versions in the page history just before each blanking of the page:
Inevitably, I suppose, our opinionated anon has started deleting my addition to the Pantheism article. I wonder if you'd like to look at it. Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 17:49, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It's been determined that 216.45.221.155 ( talk · contributions) is in fact Paul Vogel. I've banned 216.45.221.155 for an initial period of 24 hours until I can ascertain the proper procedure with an IP-address sockpuppet of a banned User. Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 21:15, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
BM, please don't recreate Smirking Chimp. I believe there's a vote going on. I don't know its current status but when I last checked, there had been no decision to recreate it. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:54, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
I feel that User:SlimVirgin has abused her administrative powers in both the Smirking Chimp redirect deletion and in several other situations. (For example, she once accused me of "vandalism" for making a page move that she personally disagreed with.) I feel that she is unable to separate her personal opinions from the use of her administrative powers. If this behavior continues, I am going to open a RFC on these actions. Since you have also had encounters with this administrator, I will notify you if this is done. Firebug 21:16, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
You might want to vote at Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion#April 13. Zocky 20:46, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I posted a follow up to a somewhat older message of your on the Achilles topic on Jimbo's talk page. No idea if I said anything you'll feel the need to reply to, but I just thought I'd let you know. Please feel free to delete this notice. -- Gmaxwell 21:46, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A new category has recently been formed which I believe to be rather unnecessary. I was interested in what your opinion on it might be. -- BaronLarf 15:46, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
I thought you might be interested in readng, and perhaps giving me your feedback on the following: [1] [2]
-- rrcaballo AT yahoo.com
I've never seen you deal with biography pages, but I know you have a level head from what I've seen of you on editing stuff like the atheism article. Anyway, there is currently a survey on style at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (biographies)/Survey on Style-Prefixed Honorary Titles and I'm pretty sure some level-headed input would be appreciated there, as most of us there are less than level-headed about the subject. Its currently a vote, and its looking like its going to come down pretty close to 50-50 on the matter, and I think that right now there really haven't been enough people (a little over 30) to really settle the matter, especially given how deep the split seems to be. Also, there have been some questions of impropriety, as to whether the vote is really "valid", though I think a great deal of that is because a few users are afraid the vote will go against them and didn't want it to be done at all, as well as others concerned with the issue of whether a vote really consitutes a consensus on the matter, especially when many people seem to be split very deeply. Anyway, I was just kind of trying to get the word out a bit because deciding Wikipedia policy on thousands of articles with 32 votes seems like it would be kind of messy. I'm pretty sure giving users messages is less than effective, but I can't really think of what else to do. Titanium Dragon 11:41, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
Brian, you are cordially invited to join the
Inquiry project.
Adraeus
10:36, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
Hiya,
you recently voted to delete John 20:16
Uncle G has made a wider proposal covering a much larger group of verses.
would you be prepared to make a similar vote at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Individual Bible verses, which covers the full list of verses in Uncle G's suggestion?
~~~~ 9 July 2005 16:39 (UTC)
I am trying to rename and move all images on the page to commons. I could move every image individualy but hope to find a faster and more fficent method. Cat chi? 13:03, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
I have already moved images of Turkey UK and US. Cat chi? 13:03, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
I come in one peice... Ne-ways whatcha upto being away this LONG? -- Cool Cat Talk| @ 21:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Francis Sant-Cassia. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Sant-Cassia (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Template:Said-Vassallo-Acknowledgement has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
09:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Intactivist. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 28#Intactivist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. --
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
01:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)