![]() | I would prefer to keep conversations unbroken. If you post a comment here, I will reply here unless you specifically request otherwise. Thanks! |
Thank you for the words of encouragement. Erechtheus ( talk) 21:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your input re the discussion about WP:N as it relates to FOSS, and specifically NoteEdit. Just one clarification re your comment, "declining to improve an article on the grounds that it has inherent notability to a subset of Wikipedians isn't likely to help it, sorry." My apologies if that is how it came across, I decided not to work on the article itself because a) I'm not familiar enough with NoteEdit, and would certainly make mistakes, and more importantly b) I was hoping to encourage a wider discussion, and felt that an unchanged article would help focus attention on the process rather than on the individual quality of a single article. I hope that is a clearer explanation of my intent.
Best regards,
ThomasNichols ( talk) 15:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thought you might want to know Otto Soemarwoto is at DYK: could never have done it without your help! I'm an Editor of the wiki citation needed 23:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
To me, it's blatant out and out trolling. But I've put it back for you. Regards, GARDEN 14:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 02:25, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Would you mind if I stole your "no" userbox? ( e • nn • en!) 23:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Ugh, sorry, forgot to uncheck the automatic templating box. Anyway, it's not really a good idea to have a duplicate copy of an article in article space; if you need to do some sandbox-type stuff, why not copy the article into your userspace sandbox? It could be confusing to have two articles that say the same thing in mainspace. Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 13:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | I would prefer to keep conversations unbroken. If you post a comment here, I will reply here unless you specifically request otherwise. Thanks! |
Thank you for the words of encouragement. Erechtheus ( talk) 21:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your input re the discussion about WP:N as it relates to FOSS, and specifically NoteEdit. Just one clarification re your comment, "declining to improve an article on the grounds that it has inherent notability to a subset of Wikipedians isn't likely to help it, sorry." My apologies if that is how it came across, I decided not to work on the article itself because a) I'm not familiar enough with NoteEdit, and would certainly make mistakes, and more importantly b) I was hoping to encourage a wider discussion, and felt that an unchanged article would help focus attention on the process rather than on the individual quality of a single article. I hope that is a clearer explanation of my intent.
Best regards,
ThomasNichols ( talk) 15:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thought you might want to know Otto Soemarwoto is at DYK: could never have done it without your help! I'm an Editor of the wiki citation needed 23:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
To me, it's blatant out and out trolling. But I've put it back for you. Regards, GARDEN 14:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 02:25, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Would you mind if I stole your "no" userbox? ( e • nn • en!) 23:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Ugh, sorry, forgot to uncheck the automatic templating box. Anyway, it's not really a good idea to have a duplicate copy of an article in article space; if you need to do some sandbox-type stuff, why not copy the article into your userspace sandbox? It could be confusing to have two articles that say the same thing in mainspace. Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 13:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)