This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Hello Avs5221, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Rupini (actress) has been removed. It was removed by SpacemanSpiff with the following edit summary '(contest PROD - some news coverage showing she's notable)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with SpacemanSpiff before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot ( talk) 01:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC) ( Learn how to opt out of these messages)
Please take a look at the documentation at Template:Article issues for the list of parameters the template accepts. Note that parameters are case sensitive and in most cases must be lowercase. Before saving the page you can use the "Show preview" button to see if all of your parameters have been accepted. -- Pascal 666 07:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Jamie S93 15:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thanks for the message. I always come to wikipedia, but i never thought about registering. Thanks again -jason —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonmpack ( talk • contribs) 10:29, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Are you an admin? I am having issues with another editor, and I would ask your assistance (if you are an admin). Please reply. Thanks. ( 64.252.139.2 ( talk) 14:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC))
There is no edit war, as you can see by my previous comment on your talk page, I ceased reverting the page following a message from the user. -- Île_flottante~Floating island Talk 14:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Please correctly cite any messages, and the person whom you believe me to have bitten. I have deleted the message you posted, which I'm sure is a mistake on your part. -- Île_flottante~Floating island Talk 16:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
avs5221 ( talk) 16:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
avs5221 ( talk) 16:31, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
I reported him, no need to report him again just FYI. -- BlackAce48 ( talk) 19:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
I've been on a bit of a tear with the anti-vandalism. 'Till I got rollback and huggle, I had no idea what a problem it is. I see you use twinkle and huggle simultaneously... great idea.
One thing I find useful, if I see someone is vandalizing more than once or twice, I look up their contribs... sometimes I can quickly bust a vandalism-only account. Good feeling! I'll see you around, and thanks again! Jusda fax 23:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Just an FYI... You left a few welcome messages on the users's respective user pages instead of their talk pages. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 17:58, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Abrahmoff is still in prison. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Violationist ( talk • contribs) 18:18, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
I was going to wait for a source, but reverting the unsourced content on Will Young was the way to go. Thank you. -- Delta1989 ( talk) 21:13, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Why are you complaining abot me and where do I respond?-- Curtis23 ( talk) 21:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
We can work this out i'll stop.-- Curtis23 ( talk) 21:55, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Come on sheesh I try to convince them and I do make arguments some agree with me some don't so you can't make that argument and are you almost done.-- Curtis23 ( talk) 22:01, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
What! Why? and also i've only made 1 revert today.-- Curtis23 ( talk) 22:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
It's been 32 minutes are you done yet (asked nicely)?-- Curtis23 ( talk) 22:18, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
The 3rr rule states: "As a means to limit edit wars, Wikipedia's policies and guidelines state that one may not revert any article more than three times in the same 24-hour period." You made three reverts on October 3rd. Listing every revert was simply to be thorough. avs5221 ( talk) 22:30, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Yeah but the 3rr rule states that I can do at the most 3 I didn't violate the rule.-- Curtis23 ( talk) 22:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
This also means that I didn't violate any rule.-- Curtis23 ( talk) 22:34, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
I see you warned Blackbox1985 ( talk · contribs) about blanking Stuart Bugg. Since he was the only substantive author, I would have thought that was an author's request for deletion (CSD G7).-- Boson ( talk) 20:58, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Can you please explain why you removed the non-notable tag from Daniel Zeichner? Neither local councillors nor parliamentary candidates are deemed notable. Wereon ( talk) 23:37, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Sure. I think he satisfies this criteria: "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage. Generally speaking, mayors are likely to meet this criterion, as are members of the main citywide government or council of a major metropolitan city." He may not elected, but he is referenced several times here and here. That said, I could very easily be persuaded otherwise. He may meet WP:NOTNEWS and a number of his secondary source mentions are both from one source and local. He does seem to have some weight/notoriety in Cambridge proper, but I'd agree if you have objections. avs5221 ( talk) 23:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello Avs5221. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Columbitech, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. The Wordsmith Communicate 03:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Hello Avs5221, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Rupini (actress) has been removed. It was removed by SpacemanSpiff with the following edit summary '(contest PROD - some news coverage showing she's notable)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with SpacemanSpiff before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot ( talk) 01:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC) ( Learn how to opt out of these messages)
Please take a look at the documentation at Template:Article issues for the list of parameters the template accepts. Note that parameters are case sensitive and in most cases must be lowercase. Before saving the page you can use the "Show preview" button to see if all of your parameters have been accepted. -- Pascal 666 07:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Jamie S93 15:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thanks for the message. I always come to wikipedia, but i never thought about registering. Thanks again -jason —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonmpack ( talk • contribs) 10:29, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Are you an admin? I am having issues with another editor, and I would ask your assistance (if you are an admin). Please reply. Thanks. ( 64.252.139.2 ( talk) 14:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC))
There is no edit war, as you can see by my previous comment on your talk page, I ceased reverting the page following a message from the user. -- Île_flottante~Floating island Talk 14:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Please correctly cite any messages, and the person whom you believe me to have bitten. I have deleted the message you posted, which I'm sure is a mistake on your part. -- Île_flottante~Floating island Talk 16:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
avs5221 ( talk) 16:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
avs5221 ( talk) 16:31, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
I reported him, no need to report him again just FYI. -- BlackAce48 ( talk) 19:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
I've been on a bit of a tear with the anti-vandalism. 'Till I got rollback and huggle, I had no idea what a problem it is. I see you use twinkle and huggle simultaneously... great idea.
One thing I find useful, if I see someone is vandalizing more than once or twice, I look up their contribs... sometimes I can quickly bust a vandalism-only account. Good feeling! I'll see you around, and thanks again! Jusda fax 23:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Just an FYI... You left a few welcome messages on the users's respective user pages instead of their talk pages. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 17:58, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Abrahmoff is still in prison. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Violationist ( talk • contribs) 18:18, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
I was going to wait for a source, but reverting the unsourced content on Will Young was the way to go. Thank you. -- Delta1989 ( talk) 21:13, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Why are you complaining abot me and where do I respond?-- Curtis23 ( talk) 21:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
We can work this out i'll stop.-- Curtis23 ( talk) 21:55, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Come on sheesh I try to convince them and I do make arguments some agree with me some don't so you can't make that argument and are you almost done.-- Curtis23 ( talk) 22:01, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
What! Why? and also i've only made 1 revert today.-- Curtis23 ( talk) 22:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
It's been 32 minutes are you done yet (asked nicely)?-- Curtis23 ( talk) 22:18, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
The 3rr rule states: "As a means to limit edit wars, Wikipedia's policies and guidelines state that one may not revert any article more than three times in the same 24-hour period." You made three reverts on October 3rd. Listing every revert was simply to be thorough. avs5221 ( talk) 22:30, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Yeah but the 3rr rule states that I can do at the most 3 I didn't violate the rule.-- Curtis23 ( talk) 22:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
This also means that I didn't violate any rule.-- Curtis23 ( talk) 22:34, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
I see you warned Blackbox1985 ( talk · contribs) about blanking Stuart Bugg. Since he was the only substantive author, I would have thought that was an author's request for deletion (CSD G7).-- Boson ( talk) 20:58, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Can you please explain why you removed the non-notable tag from Daniel Zeichner? Neither local councillors nor parliamentary candidates are deemed notable. Wereon ( talk) 23:37, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Sure. I think he satisfies this criteria: "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage. Generally speaking, mayors are likely to meet this criterion, as are members of the main citywide government or council of a major metropolitan city." He may not elected, but he is referenced several times here and here. That said, I could very easily be persuaded otherwise. He may meet WP:NOTNEWS and a number of his secondary source mentions are both from one source and local. He does seem to have some weight/notoriety in Cambridge proper, but I'd agree if you have objections. avs5221 ( talk) 23:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello Avs5221. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Columbitech, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. The Wordsmith Communicate 03:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)