![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
1 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | ← | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | → | 60 |
You may opt-out of future notification regarding this case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3/Evidence. Please add your evidence by September 8, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey Av, would you mind deleting all my contributions? I like to look back at my edits and see what I've done (as far as minor edits, new pages, etc) and I haven't been marking my edits.
Thanks, Baleni ( talk) 17:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Baleni ( talk) 17:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton ( talk) and MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
I noticed that you set up archiving here. But you should also include a search bar like I did here. Otherwise the archives are not easily accessible from the main page. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 13:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
User:Avraham, if I should take Content dispute to WP:Dispute resolution, will I be able to count on you to give me your profession advice with regard to edits on this page? Davidbena ( talk) 04:32, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Avraham. A decision has been proposed in the Palestine-Israel articles 3 arbitration case, for which you are on the notification list. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 ( t / c / ping in reply) 20:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC) (via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk))
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
User:Avraham, As of yesterday, there was no specific article on Wikipedia dealing with the specific Jewish festivals known as a "Festival-day" (Yom-Tov). That means 15-years of Wikipedia without an article on the Jewish "Festival-day." This prompted me to write an article yesterday on the subject, which you can read here: Festival-day, but now a person has wrongly suggested that it be deleted. See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Festival-day. Can you please interject here and voice your opinion whether or not the article should be deleted, as your view is important here, I would think. It's urgent. Davidbena ( talk) 14:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Avi, and best wishes for 2016. I know you're not very active on Wikipedia these days, but when you get a chance, I'd appreciate it if you would change the "Retired" template on User:Malik Shabazz to "Semi-retired". I stop by periodically to reply to messages and maintain Malcolm X and do a few other things, which means I'm technically not retired. Thank you. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 18:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Reb Avraham, shalom. Since I respect your opinion more than almost anyone else here, on Wikipedia, because of your vast experience in editing on this venue, can I please ask you what you personally feel was the main problem/issue with the article posted recently by me on the Yom Tov and which has since been deleted? Looking for constructive criticism. Be well. Davidbena ( talk) 16:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Shalom, User:Avraham. I wanted to know if you think that my proposals were reasonable here. Be well. Davidbena ( talk) 18:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
I had a look to see if other sources refer to 1066 in Grenada as a massacre, and they do! So, please accept my apologies - massacre seems to be a fairly sourced term for the lead. Assassinated though? It's a little ambiguous - to me, it's the same as saying someone was murdered - killed is far more neutral. But, crucified is far more specific. Which do you think deserves the emphasis in the lead? Assassinated - which deals with the political motivation of the killing, or Crucified - which deals with the method? Spacecowboy420 ( talk) 09:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
That guy questioned the motives of most of the opposes, calling them nothing more than "Rah Rah cheerleading for Eric." Yet you left his bad faith assumptions and redacted my calling him out on having done so? I don't understand that at all. Hallward's Ghost (Kevin) ( My talkpage) 23:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Hey Avi, thanks for the clerking at the RFA. Would you mind looking at this redaction you made as I think it might have changed the meaning a bit. I think the "the only editors who actually" part was important for the meaning. If you think it's better to leave that out, it's your call (as a crat and steward you probably know a bit more than me), but I just thought you might have broken it at the wrong point. Thanks, Wugapodes ( talk) 00:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Nothing ever goes 100% the way any person hopes it will. RfA can be very ... difficult? Thank you for doing a great job at trying to keep some sort of decorum there. Regardless of my own personal feelings on this one individual RfA, I think the entire community benefits when you (and you plural for crats), oversee the procedure in positive ways. Thanks. — Ched : ? 09:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Awesome clerking. Thanks. -- Anthonyhcole ( talk · contribs · email) 13:11, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
Just wanted to thank you for your top work clerking this RfA. You ventured into the unknown, and it was hardly a walk in the park (even as RfA goes!) While redactions can always be contentious, I think you dealt with the whole process very well, and managed to keep things on track and pretty civil. Thanks! Harrias talk 19:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC) |
Regarding the RfA: I got an evasive answer to a follow-up question, asked a different follow-up question, all about my concern that the candidate gave a barnstar for a block without a warning to the blocked. Why do you hide that? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 19:44, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award |
Clerking is not easy. You handled it well. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 22:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC) |
@ Hawkeye7: Thank you very much. You should feel very proud that so many people think so highly of you, and I think that should you address the concerns about responsibility and judgement over the next year or so, the Wikipedia community will respond. Thank you as well, for acting with grace and maturity throughout this difficult process. -- Avi ( talk) 04:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Your clerking works so well that the disruptive minority had to use cheap metaphors to describe it. Well done.
Esquivalience
t
02:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey Avi, you're an Oversighter who's been active in the last hour or so...
Do you know who's currently running the oversight-l and functionaries-en lists (I'm assuming things are the same as they were 2 years ago, maybe that's naive)? I should do whatever I need to do to get back on them. Also, I guess I need to get access to requests that come in via oversight-en-wp; is that through an OTRS interface or something? I didn't handle incoming requests when I was on the committee, so I never actually dealt with any of that. I kind of assumed there'd be a Welcome Wagon (probably dating myself) or something with pamphlets and coupons and instructions who would just show up after the OS bit was flipped. If you can point me in the right direction and give me a better person to pester, I'd appreciate it. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 19:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Avi, I've planned to use Tor browser by running from a USB drive. But today, while editing a WP article, I've received this message in the Tor browser.
"You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
Your IP address, {0}, has been automatically identified as a Tor exit node. Editing through Tor is blocked to prevent abuse. For additional information and instructions to legitimate users, see the No open proxies global policy."
And as per WP:IPBLOCK, I understand that I should contact a CheckUser to request an IP address block exemption. Could you consider my request? Vipinhari || talk 12:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Avi, I'm interested in creating Santosky v. Kramer but saw that it was previously deleted and wanted to look at the content and see if it could be improved. I'm not sure how requesting the contents of a deleted page is typically done, so if I should post somewhere else, let me know! Thanks. Wugapodes ( talk) 18:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
This might almost be true, [1] but not until after the 12th or 13th century, as the article already explains. This is an historical/theological article. -- Kendrick7 talk 06:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Is there a way I can link a page with a part of another page: Wood of Ephraim want to put for el link the header Δρυμός Εφραίμ Εφραιμ#Δρυμός Εφραίμ. Thanks. Wolfymoza ( talk) 12:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
No that's not that what I meant, but that's ok, I ve done it. I added in the end of the article, el:Εφραίμ#Δρυμός Εφραίμ, and thus is added in the links. Wolfymoza ( talk) 08:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Avi, I would be grateful for your assistance with a new user, User:Luke de paul (who appears to be very young) who wants to change his user name to User:Roger Delacroix, and who asked for advice on my talk page.
My interpretation of WP:RENAME as applied to this user was that the best course of action – since this is a new editor with relatively few edits – was simply to set up a new account from scratch and discard the old one. Unfortunately, our young friend moved his user pages without waiting for my response to his request, and has since has been very reluctant to follow my advice. As I feared might happen, other users have edited both the old and new pages, meaning that, without admin assistance, he now can't follow my instructions, even if he wanted to. Given his reluctance to follow advice, I suspect some force majeure may be required, but I leave it to your very capable judgement.
Thanks in advance for your help,
-- NSH002 ( talk) 08:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
P.S. See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 March 8#User talk:Luke de paul
Shalom, User:Avraham, can I please receive an opinion from you on the Emmaus Nicopolis Talk-Page, there in the sub-section, where there is a Discussion on whether or not the following edit, "The site today is inside Canada Park in the West Bank, and maintained by the Jewish National Fund of Canada," should be amended to read: "The site today is inside Canada Park in what was formerly Jordan (i.e. West Bank), but now in Israel and maintained by the Jewish National Fund of Canada." Another option might be simply to write, "The site today is inside Canada Park near the Latrun Monastery, and maintained by the Jewish National Fund of Canada," in which case we bypass this contentious issue. Sincerely, Davidbena ( talk) 14:35, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Avi, I hope your Pesach was great! I would like you to take a look at Stanley Milgram's talk page. Apparently you need to be frum in order to be labeled as Jewish in Wikipedia land. I don't think that's acceptable and CIR issues are mostly in play. Sir Joseph (talk) 14:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Then Shabbat Shalom to you, and also Hag Kasher v'Sameah. StevenJ81 ( talk) 17:30, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Is there any way all my edits can be removed, or at least my username from it? If you may recall I was a sock in 2009, and got granted a return to editing and changed my name in 2013. I originally requested for my old username to no longer be visible (due to privacy reasons_, but it still is present in some areas. All my old contributions also still exist under my current username. Could all my contributions be stripped from my username? -- NGSF ( talk) 17:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
1 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | ← | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | → | 60 |
You may opt-out of future notification regarding this case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3/Evidence. Please add your evidence by September 8, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey Av, would you mind deleting all my contributions? I like to look back at my edits and see what I've done (as far as minor edits, new pages, etc) and I haven't been marking my edits.
Thanks, Baleni ( talk) 17:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Baleni ( talk) 17:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton ( talk) and MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
I noticed that you set up archiving here. But you should also include a search bar like I did here. Otherwise the archives are not easily accessible from the main page. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 13:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
User:Avraham, if I should take Content dispute to WP:Dispute resolution, will I be able to count on you to give me your profession advice with regard to edits on this page? Davidbena ( talk) 04:32, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Avraham. A decision has been proposed in the Palestine-Israel articles 3 arbitration case, for which you are on the notification list. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 ( t / c / ping in reply) 20:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC) (via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk))
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
User:Avraham, As of yesterday, there was no specific article on Wikipedia dealing with the specific Jewish festivals known as a "Festival-day" (Yom-Tov). That means 15-years of Wikipedia without an article on the Jewish "Festival-day." This prompted me to write an article yesterday on the subject, which you can read here: Festival-day, but now a person has wrongly suggested that it be deleted. See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Festival-day. Can you please interject here and voice your opinion whether or not the article should be deleted, as your view is important here, I would think. It's urgent. Davidbena ( talk) 14:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Avi, and best wishes for 2016. I know you're not very active on Wikipedia these days, but when you get a chance, I'd appreciate it if you would change the "Retired" template on User:Malik Shabazz to "Semi-retired". I stop by periodically to reply to messages and maintain Malcolm X and do a few other things, which means I'm technically not retired. Thank you. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 18:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Reb Avraham, shalom. Since I respect your opinion more than almost anyone else here, on Wikipedia, because of your vast experience in editing on this venue, can I please ask you what you personally feel was the main problem/issue with the article posted recently by me on the Yom Tov and which has since been deleted? Looking for constructive criticism. Be well. Davidbena ( talk) 16:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Shalom, User:Avraham. I wanted to know if you think that my proposals were reasonable here. Be well. Davidbena ( talk) 18:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
I had a look to see if other sources refer to 1066 in Grenada as a massacre, and they do! So, please accept my apologies - massacre seems to be a fairly sourced term for the lead. Assassinated though? It's a little ambiguous - to me, it's the same as saying someone was murdered - killed is far more neutral. But, crucified is far more specific. Which do you think deserves the emphasis in the lead? Assassinated - which deals with the political motivation of the killing, or Crucified - which deals with the method? Spacecowboy420 ( talk) 09:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
That guy questioned the motives of most of the opposes, calling them nothing more than "Rah Rah cheerleading for Eric." Yet you left his bad faith assumptions and redacted my calling him out on having done so? I don't understand that at all. Hallward's Ghost (Kevin) ( My talkpage) 23:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Hey Avi, thanks for the clerking at the RFA. Would you mind looking at this redaction you made as I think it might have changed the meaning a bit. I think the "the only editors who actually" part was important for the meaning. If you think it's better to leave that out, it's your call (as a crat and steward you probably know a bit more than me), but I just thought you might have broken it at the wrong point. Thanks, Wugapodes ( talk) 00:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Nothing ever goes 100% the way any person hopes it will. RfA can be very ... difficult? Thank you for doing a great job at trying to keep some sort of decorum there. Regardless of my own personal feelings on this one individual RfA, I think the entire community benefits when you (and you plural for crats), oversee the procedure in positive ways. Thanks. — Ched : ? 09:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Awesome clerking. Thanks. -- Anthonyhcole ( talk · contribs · email) 13:11, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
Just wanted to thank you for your top work clerking this RfA. You ventured into the unknown, and it was hardly a walk in the park (even as RfA goes!) While redactions can always be contentious, I think you dealt with the whole process very well, and managed to keep things on track and pretty civil. Thanks! Harrias talk 19:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC) |
Regarding the RfA: I got an evasive answer to a follow-up question, asked a different follow-up question, all about my concern that the candidate gave a barnstar for a block without a warning to the blocked. Why do you hide that? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 19:44, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award |
Clerking is not easy. You handled it well. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 22:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC) |
@ Hawkeye7: Thank you very much. You should feel very proud that so many people think so highly of you, and I think that should you address the concerns about responsibility and judgement over the next year or so, the Wikipedia community will respond. Thank you as well, for acting with grace and maturity throughout this difficult process. -- Avi ( talk) 04:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Your clerking works so well that the disruptive minority had to use cheap metaphors to describe it. Well done.
Esquivalience
t
02:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey Avi, you're an Oversighter who's been active in the last hour or so...
Do you know who's currently running the oversight-l and functionaries-en lists (I'm assuming things are the same as they were 2 years ago, maybe that's naive)? I should do whatever I need to do to get back on them. Also, I guess I need to get access to requests that come in via oversight-en-wp; is that through an OTRS interface or something? I didn't handle incoming requests when I was on the committee, so I never actually dealt with any of that. I kind of assumed there'd be a Welcome Wagon (probably dating myself) or something with pamphlets and coupons and instructions who would just show up after the OS bit was flipped. If you can point me in the right direction and give me a better person to pester, I'd appreciate it. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 19:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Avi, I've planned to use Tor browser by running from a USB drive. But today, while editing a WP article, I've received this message in the Tor browser.
"You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
Your IP address, {0}, has been automatically identified as a Tor exit node. Editing through Tor is blocked to prevent abuse. For additional information and instructions to legitimate users, see the No open proxies global policy."
And as per WP:IPBLOCK, I understand that I should contact a CheckUser to request an IP address block exemption. Could you consider my request? Vipinhari || talk 12:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Avi, I'm interested in creating Santosky v. Kramer but saw that it was previously deleted and wanted to look at the content and see if it could be improved. I'm not sure how requesting the contents of a deleted page is typically done, so if I should post somewhere else, let me know! Thanks. Wugapodes ( talk) 18:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
This might almost be true, [1] but not until after the 12th or 13th century, as the article already explains. This is an historical/theological article. -- Kendrick7 talk 06:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Is there a way I can link a page with a part of another page: Wood of Ephraim want to put for el link the header Δρυμός Εφραίμ Εφραιμ#Δρυμός Εφραίμ. Thanks. Wolfymoza ( talk) 12:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
No that's not that what I meant, but that's ok, I ve done it. I added in the end of the article, el:Εφραίμ#Δρυμός Εφραίμ, and thus is added in the links. Wolfymoza ( talk) 08:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Avi, I would be grateful for your assistance with a new user, User:Luke de paul (who appears to be very young) who wants to change his user name to User:Roger Delacroix, and who asked for advice on my talk page.
My interpretation of WP:RENAME as applied to this user was that the best course of action – since this is a new editor with relatively few edits – was simply to set up a new account from scratch and discard the old one. Unfortunately, our young friend moved his user pages without waiting for my response to his request, and has since has been very reluctant to follow my advice. As I feared might happen, other users have edited both the old and new pages, meaning that, without admin assistance, he now can't follow my instructions, even if he wanted to. Given his reluctance to follow advice, I suspect some force majeure may be required, but I leave it to your very capable judgement.
Thanks in advance for your help,
-- NSH002 ( talk) 08:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
P.S. See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 March 8#User talk:Luke de paul
Shalom, User:Avraham, can I please receive an opinion from you on the Emmaus Nicopolis Talk-Page, there in the sub-section, where there is a Discussion on whether or not the following edit, "The site today is inside Canada Park in the West Bank, and maintained by the Jewish National Fund of Canada," should be amended to read: "The site today is inside Canada Park in what was formerly Jordan (i.e. West Bank), but now in Israel and maintained by the Jewish National Fund of Canada." Another option might be simply to write, "The site today is inside Canada Park near the Latrun Monastery, and maintained by the Jewish National Fund of Canada," in which case we bypass this contentious issue. Sincerely, Davidbena ( talk) 14:35, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Avi, I hope your Pesach was great! I would like you to take a look at Stanley Milgram's talk page. Apparently you need to be frum in order to be labeled as Jewish in Wikipedia land. I don't think that's acceptable and CIR issues are mostly in play. Sir Joseph (talk) 14:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Then Shabbat Shalom to you, and also Hag Kasher v'Sameah. StevenJ81 ( talk) 17:30, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Is there any way all my edits can be removed, or at least my username from it? If you may recall I was a sock in 2009, and got granted a return to editing and changed my name in 2013. I originally requested for my old username to no longer be visible (due to privacy reasons_, but it still is present in some areas. All my old contributions also still exist under my current username. Could all my contributions be stripped from my username? -- NGSF ( talk) 17:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)