You may like to consider contributing your thoughts at Talk:Sai Baba of Shirdi. I find opposing editors (Kkrystian) often lacking in sources and knowledge of Wikipedia policy, which means that I have to revert some edits and then indulge in long explanations about why my actions were justified. It would help to have a third opinion like the one you provide at Talk: Sathya Sai Baba. Now that it is the Xmas break, I have some time on my hands and may be able to get around to improving both these articles and expand them, reliably-sourced of course. Thanks, Ekantik talk 19:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Because of your participation in discussions relating to the "PSTS" model in the No original research article, I am notifying you that a request for arbitration has been opened here. I invite you to provide a statement encouraging the Arbcom to review this matter, so that we can settle it once and for all. COGDEN 23:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the direction on the talk page. So if I get this correctly cited text must reflect the overall POV of the whole citation. Is that correct? Anthon01 ( talk) 17:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
I sent this to afd in case the subject is notable enough for an article. Maybe it can be rewritten/balanced? Anyway, I wanted to let you know so you can comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gropegate. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 00:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
You have been a wonderful person to me with all your help and understanding of limited capabilities. You promised long ago to help me and watch my back for mistakes and help me understand things here in Wiki world. You have done that and more. You are very patient and so I just want to wish you and yours the best health and a very happy holiday season. Hopefully 2008 will be good to us! Happy editing! -- CrohnieGal Talk 17:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
...to the next New York City Meetup!
![]() |
New York City Meetup
|
In the morning, there are exciting plans for a behind-the-scenes guided tour of the American Museum of Natural History.
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues (see the last meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at
Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
00:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Could you make your opinion clear on Talk:Quackwatch? -- Ronz ( talk) 00:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Are you an admin? Is there a place were I can find out whether someone is an admin of not? Thanks. Anthon01 ( talk) 16:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
For convenience, from my talk:
Disingenious
I take exception to this diffless edit. The "disingenious" remark is baseless. I am completely uninvolved in the dispute with Ronz about which you posted at WQA and I am almost uninvolved in the QW article (as anyone will tell you who has been around on that article's talk page for the last couple of months I generally avoid it like the plague due to its bizarre editing atmosphere). The rest of this edit only shows you don't know what WP:DR is. You may want to remove the edit (the discussion being closed does not mean you can't retract anything). Avb 23:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
You may like to consider contributing your thoughts at Talk:Sai Baba of Shirdi. I find opposing editors (Kkrystian) often lacking in sources and knowledge of Wikipedia policy, which means that I have to revert some edits and then indulge in long explanations about why my actions were justified. It would help to have a third opinion like the one you provide at Talk: Sathya Sai Baba. Now that it is the Xmas break, I have some time on my hands and may be able to get around to improving both these articles and expand them, reliably-sourced of course. Thanks, Ekantik talk 19:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Because of your participation in discussions relating to the "PSTS" model in the No original research article, I am notifying you that a request for arbitration has been opened here. I invite you to provide a statement encouraging the Arbcom to review this matter, so that we can settle it once and for all. COGDEN 23:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the direction on the talk page. So if I get this correctly cited text must reflect the overall POV of the whole citation. Is that correct? Anthon01 ( talk) 17:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
I sent this to afd in case the subject is notable enough for an article. Maybe it can be rewritten/balanced? Anyway, I wanted to let you know so you can comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gropegate. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 00:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
You have been a wonderful person to me with all your help and understanding of limited capabilities. You promised long ago to help me and watch my back for mistakes and help me understand things here in Wiki world. You have done that and more. You are very patient and so I just want to wish you and yours the best health and a very happy holiday season. Hopefully 2008 will be good to us! Happy editing! -- CrohnieGal Talk 17:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
...to the next New York City Meetup!
![]() |
New York City Meetup
|
In the morning, there are exciting plans for a behind-the-scenes guided tour of the American Museum of Natural History.
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues (see the last meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at
Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
00:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Could you make your opinion clear on Talk:Quackwatch? -- Ronz ( talk) 00:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Are you an admin? Is there a place were I can find out whether someone is an admin of not? Thanks. Anthon01 ( talk) 16:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
For convenience, from my talk:
Disingenious
I take exception to this diffless edit. The "disingenious" remark is baseless. I am completely uninvolved in the dispute with Ronz about which you posted at WQA and I am almost uninvolved in the QW article (as anyone will tell you who has been around on that article's talk page for the last couple of months I generally avoid it like the plague due to its bizarre editing atmosphere). The rest of this edit only shows you don't know what WP:DR is. You may want to remove the edit (the discussion being closed does not mean you can't retract anything). Avb 23:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)