The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
I've noticed your comments about the City of Sin and especially appreciate the pun of your account name. You should come along to a London meetup, where you will find that we are a reasonably convivial crowd and this might cheer you up. Andrew D. ( talk) 08:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Undercover: The True Story of Britain's Secret Police is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undercover: The True Story of Britain's Secret Police until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VMS Mosaic ( talk) 10:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disenchantment: The Guardian and Israel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disenchantment: The Guardian and Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VMS Mosaic ( talk) 10:33, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
A conflict of interest in that his editing seems to be almost all on the subject of Owen Jones, including the deliberate misinterpreting of sources (calling his critics "trolls who obviously never read the book"). See also this in which he parrots Jones' views without any sense of nuance. Imagine writing "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion describes the links between the different groups which form World Jewry. It explains their links and their common interest in promoting Zionist ideals, whilst often claiming to serve the public", or similar on Bat Ye'Or's Eurabia book '''tAD''' ( talk) 10:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
User:MarnetteD, I am really shocked and disgusted at the way you reacted to my attempt to seriously and civilly discuss the matter with you. AusLondonder ( talk) 19:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
The article Younous Omarjee has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. I dream of horses ( talk to me) ( contributions) @ 03:13, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi . When you're adding the {{ Infobox YouTube personality}} to pages can you please not add date of birth unless it is already present on the article. You've twice now removed a notice saying that Youtube is not a reliable source and that adding a date of birth is not appropriate without supplying one. Additionally, the channel stats should not be exact as 1) it looks messy 2) it's correct for an extremely short amount of time and 3) it's pretty hard to maintain. Rounded figures in millions are more than sufficient. Cheers, Nik the stunned 11:27, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
The article Chantal Cauquil has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster ( talk) 00:10, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
I have nominated the article for deletion. Please discuss there. -- George Ho ( talk) 17:31, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
On the new page feed I found Nikolaos Moraitis you have him being born in both 1980 and 1957! Which one is it? (Considering the fact that the 2 dates are not even close!) Wgolf ( talk) 20:11, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. AusLondonder, thanks for creating Niki Albon!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy ( talk) 20:45, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I am removing your nomination of a NZ category from the WP:CFDS page, as you did not tag the category page with {{ cfr-speedy}}, despite a reminder to do so. [1] Feel free to start again. – Fayenatic L ondon 12:58, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cuba Solidarity Campaign, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cuba-solidarity.org.uk/aims.asp.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot ( talk) 10:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
There is no rule that every occupational category which happens to have a couple of LGBT people in it automatically gets an "LGBT occupation" subcategory — under WP:CATGRS, we expressly limit that to the specific subset of occupations where the conjunction of LGBTness with the occupation is itself a WP:DEFINING characteristic in its own right. For instance, Category:LGBT writers is permitted, because their literary output is the genre of LGBT literature — but we conversely don't (and rightly shouldn't) have corresponding categories for "LGBT economists" or "LGBT nuclear physicists", as there's no evidence that the work of LGBT people in those fields is a distinct thing from the work of non-LGBT people in those fields.
As a rule, an LGBT-occupation category is not allowed to exist until you can actually write a full, properly sourced "head article" to support why the intersection is a notable grouping in its own right — if you can't do that, but instead the category is just serving as "people who happen to be two otherwise unrelated things at once", then the category isn't allowed to exist. Wikipedia categories do not exist just to make young people feel good, but are permitted only on WP:DEFINING characteristics. And accordingly, I'm really not all that concerned that it "disappoints" you — I'm willing to reconsider if you can provide actual proof that the intersection of LGBTness with YouTuberness is recognized by reliable sources as being a notable thing in its own right, but the mere fact that there are LGBT YouTubers does not automatically justify the category in and of itself. Bearcat ( talk) 23:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Applying rules and regulations to the letter is rather disruptive. No need to let me know that you couldn't give a shit about disappointing me. It's patently obvious. AusLondonder ( talk) 23:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Endorsements in the Greek bailout referendum, 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Dawn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:12, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Done AusLondonder ( talk) 19:23, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Endorsements in the Greek bailout referendum, 2015 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endorsements in the Greek bailout referendum, 2015 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magioladitis ( talk) 17:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Since you're pretty much the only contributor to the article and it used to be a redirect, I thought I'd ask you about this on your talk page instead of making an AfD. Would you be willing to turn Abby Tomlinson back into a redirect, and add the information from it onto the article about Millifandom. This seems like a clear cut WP:BLP1E case to me as all her notability comes from her involvement in Milifandom during the 2015 General election. Bosstopher ( talk) 20:14, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
I need your advice on how to make a wikipedia page that will not redirect to another wikipedia page.
please help. I will really appreciate it. Zine ntleks ( talk) 10:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mongolia–United Kingdom relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rio Tinto. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Done AusLondonder ( talk) 17:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Bobtinin. AusLondonder, thanks for creating Commonwealth Lawyers Association!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Good work on the Commonwealth Lawyers Association article. This page needs additional references and the references already in place need to be fixed.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Bobtinin ( talk) 00:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Extreme Centre: A Warning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Empire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Done AusLondonder ( talk) 22:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Duel: Pakistan on the Flight Path of American Power, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North West Frontier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Done AusLondonder ( talk) 14:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Hard Work: Life in Low-pay Britain, AusLondonder!
Wikipedia editor Samtar just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice write up :)
To reply, leave a comment on Samtar's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Done AusLondonder ( talk) 09:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Racket (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Racket (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Neither 2003 Route 60 Hamas ambush nor SeaGlass Carousel fit the speedy deletion criteria. This is disruptive editing, please read WP:BEFORE. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 00:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
I assume that you intend to notify all editors who participated in the previous AFD. Not exclusively the nom, who - obviously - agrees with you. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 14:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
I do not know why you are WP:WIKIHOUNDING me. But I am asking you to cease. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 15:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
I've noticed your comments about the City of Sin and especially appreciate the pun of your account name. You should come along to a London meetup, where you will find that we are a reasonably convivial crowd and this might cheer you up. Andrew D. ( talk) 08:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Undercover: The True Story of Britain's Secret Police is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undercover: The True Story of Britain's Secret Police until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VMS Mosaic ( talk) 10:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disenchantment: The Guardian and Israel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disenchantment: The Guardian and Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VMS Mosaic ( talk) 10:33, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
A conflict of interest in that his editing seems to be almost all on the subject of Owen Jones, including the deliberate misinterpreting of sources (calling his critics "trolls who obviously never read the book"). See also this in which he parrots Jones' views without any sense of nuance. Imagine writing "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion describes the links between the different groups which form World Jewry. It explains their links and their common interest in promoting Zionist ideals, whilst often claiming to serve the public", or similar on Bat Ye'Or's Eurabia book '''tAD''' ( talk) 10:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
User:MarnetteD, I am really shocked and disgusted at the way you reacted to my attempt to seriously and civilly discuss the matter with you. AusLondonder ( talk) 19:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
The article Younous Omarjee has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. I dream of horses ( talk to me) ( contributions) @ 03:13, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi . When you're adding the {{ Infobox YouTube personality}} to pages can you please not add date of birth unless it is already present on the article. You've twice now removed a notice saying that Youtube is not a reliable source and that adding a date of birth is not appropriate without supplying one. Additionally, the channel stats should not be exact as 1) it looks messy 2) it's correct for an extremely short amount of time and 3) it's pretty hard to maintain. Rounded figures in millions are more than sufficient. Cheers, Nik the stunned 11:27, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
The article Chantal Cauquil has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster ( talk) 00:10, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
I have nominated the article for deletion. Please discuss there. -- George Ho ( talk) 17:31, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
On the new page feed I found Nikolaos Moraitis you have him being born in both 1980 and 1957! Which one is it? (Considering the fact that the 2 dates are not even close!) Wgolf ( talk) 20:11, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. AusLondonder, thanks for creating Niki Albon!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy ( talk) 20:45, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I am removing your nomination of a NZ category from the WP:CFDS page, as you did not tag the category page with {{ cfr-speedy}}, despite a reminder to do so. [1] Feel free to start again. – Fayenatic L ondon 12:58, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cuba Solidarity Campaign, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cuba-solidarity.org.uk/aims.asp.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot ( talk) 10:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
There is no rule that every occupational category which happens to have a couple of LGBT people in it automatically gets an "LGBT occupation" subcategory — under WP:CATGRS, we expressly limit that to the specific subset of occupations where the conjunction of LGBTness with the occupation is itself a WP:DEFINING characteristic in its own right. For instance, Category:LGBT writers is permitted, because their literary output is the genre of LGBT literature — but we conversely don't (and rightly shouldn't) have corresponding categories for "LGBT economists" or "LGBT nuclear physicists", as there's no evidence that the work of LGBT people in those fields is a distinct thing from the work of non-LGBT people in those fields.
As a rule, an LGBT-occupation category is not allowed to exist until you can actually write a full, properly sourced "head article" to support why the intersection is a notable grouping in its own right — if you can't do that, but instead the category is just serving as "people who happen to be two otherwise unrelated things at once", then the category isn't allowed to exist. Wikipedia categories do not exist just to make young people feel good, but are permitted only on WP:DEFINING characteristics. And accordingly, I'm really not all that concerned that it "disappoints" you — I'm willing to reconsider if you can provide actual proof that the intersection of LGBTness with YouTuberness is recognized by reliable sources as being a notable thing in its own right, but the mere fact that there are LGBT YouTubers does not automatically justify the category in and of itself. Bearcat ( talk) 23:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Applying rules and regulations to the letter is rather disruptive. No need to let me know that you couldn't give a shit about disappointing me. It's patently obvious. AusLondonder ( talk) 23:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Endorsements in the Greek bailout referendum, 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Dawn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:12, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Done AusLondonder ( talk) 19:23, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Endorsements in the Greek bailout referendum, 2015 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endorsements in the Greek bailout referendum, 2015 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magioladitis ( talk) 17:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Since you're pretty much the only contributor to the article and it used to be a redirect, I thought I'd ask you about this on your talk page instead of making an AfD. Would you be willing to turn Abby Tomlinson back into a redirect, and add the information from it onto the article about Millifandom. This seems like a clear cut WP:BLP1E case to me as all her notability comes from her involvement in Milifandom during the 2015 General election. Bosstopher ( talk) 20:14, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
I need your advice on how to make a wikipedia page that will not redirect to another wikipedia page.
please help. I will really appreciate it. Zine ntleks ( talk) 10:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mongolia–United Kingdom relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rio Tinto. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Done AusLondonder ( talk) 17:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Bobtinin. AusLondonder, thanks for creating Commonwealth Lawyers Association!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Good work on the Commonwealth Lawyers Association article. This page needs additional references and the references already in place need to be fixed.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Bobtinin ( talk) 00:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Extreme Centre: A Warning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Empire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Done AusLondonder ( talk) 22:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Duel: Pakistan on the Flight Path of American Power, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North West Frontier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Done AusLondonder ( talk) 14:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Hard Work: Life in Low-pay Britain, AusLondonder!
Wikipedia editor Samtar just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice write up :)
To reply, leave a comment on Samtar's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Done AusLondonder ( talk) 09:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Racket (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Racket (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Neither 2003 Route 60 Hamas ambush nor SeaGlass Carousel fit the speedy deletion criteria. This is disruptive editing, please read WP:BEFORE. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 00:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
I assume that you intend to notify all editors who participated in the previous AFD. Not exclusively the nom, who - obviously - agrees with you. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 14:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
I do not know why you are WP:WIKIHOUNDING me. But I am asking you to cease. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 15:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)