![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome. - Jmabel | Talk 00:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Jmabel, I'm in a quandary about the German unification article. It needed a lot of work, and I read your comments on its discussion page. I've done a bit of "tweeking" I guess you could call it...it's vastly longer, and more elaborate. I'm confused about what else to do, however, how to get it "approved," etc., and then what? as an experienced wikipedia person, can you help me? It is on my user page.... Auntieruth55 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC).
Thanks very much for your help. I'll plug it in and see what happens. I used myown user page because Ididn't know what else to do. :) Auntieruth55 ( talk) 00:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Kusma ( talk) has now fixed the template for the WP:GER assessment; so the article should now show class=B. You might want to request assessment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment#Requests for assessment.-- Boson ( talk) 20:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm no expert on the GA/FA process; perhaps Jmabel or Casliber can give better advice. I would tend to let the peer review run for a while. I think nomination for GA or FA normally terminates peer review. Personally, I would tend to skip GA and go straight for FA. I haven't yet found time to have a closer look at the article again, but I would mention a few things:
I've revised some of the article German Unification and posted my revisions, per the suggestion of another user. I had asked for peer review, but apparently that will happen regardless. My students use this site, so I had checked on it to see what they were quoting/misquoting (often misquoting). Auntieruth55 ( talk) 01:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Got it. Genuinely done, for tonight at least. I'll take a look at what you've done in the morning! Now I'm going to work on the dissertation. Thanks for all your help! 01:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I went through and did a pretty comprehensive copyedit. I can tell that you know the material better than I, so while I've alerted the relevant WikiProject and someone should eventually review from that angle, I pretty much stayed out of anything substantive.
Do please see a couple of questions I asked at the bottom of Talk:Unification of Germany. Thanks for all your work on this. - Jmabel | Talk 18:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome, Auntieruth55, to the WikiProject Germany! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Germany-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{ WikiProject Germany}}. A few features that you might find helpful:
A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Here are some tasks you can do. Please remove completed tasks from the list.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! Agathoclea ( talk) 18:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 23:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your post on the WikiProject Germany talk page. Quite a lot of templates do work on English Wiki and there is at least one clever dual language one. But if it doesn't what I usually do is find the English Wiki equivalent and put in a redirect from the German template name. Then change the field names with data in them to their English template equivalent (see Selbitz River). But you can go further. I copied a complex German template for locomotives ( Template:Infobox Schienenfahrzeug and Prussian P 8) into English Wiki and only changed the displayed field name. So in effect it translates it automatically. You can even get it to recognise and translate data if they are predictable (see Template:Bahnhof and Hof Hauptbahnhof). But I'm no expert and it's taken a degree of trial and error! Gruß, Paul. -- Bermicourt ( talk) 20:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
The
April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
22:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm here and not Unification of Germany because I'm only asking for my own curiosity: does civil war have a different meaning in German than in English or is this particular war considered a civil war because wars between similar peoples even though under different governments counts as civil wars? The War of 1812 between US and Great Britain not a civil war but the American Revolution could be considered one. It's late, I hope this makes sense to you. Nitpyck ( talk) 05:29, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you so much. So often the fine details are blurred in translation. Nitpyck ( talk) 03:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate your comments about the article and I'm working on fixing them right now. I wanted to ask you if you thought I should even include the last bit about after the credits. I don't think it really helps the plot and the Nicole character was in the film for about a minute before that point. Also the theme has a revenge part about it because he wants to get revenge on his family's killer. You want that in the lead? -- Peppage tlk 00:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Welcome, Auntieruth55, to the Former countries WikiProject! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on a formerly existing country, state, or territory, please tag their talk page with our project template {{ WPFC}}. Here are a few features that you might find helpful:
And here are some tasks you can do:
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! Laurinavicius ( talk) 19:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
I have the page watched. my name inc Ottoman project 00:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Wasn't sure if you were watching Wikipedia:Peer review/Ostend Manifesto/archive1 since the other reviewer stated he wouldn't be, so I figured I'd leave you a note here. Thanks for your insightful comments. I had completely reorganised it and wasn't sure where I was going with the dilemma section, but I think I'll move the Black Warrior into it (retitled "Pierce administration") and move some of the stuff about the preceding administrations up to the context section. I have it at User:Recognizance/Sandbox and intend to incorporate the PR suggestions while I'm performing the surgery; feel free to edit it like a normal article.
The part I'm concerned about is the Caribbean "angle" because I don't think I've come across anything directly mentioning that so far. (I did come across a humorously titled book called Manifest manhood and the antebellum American empire though.) Do you think having the opinions of the Cuban populace would be enough? There's plenty of discussion of that. Recognizance ( talk) 05:27, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ruth. Would you mind giving the article a second look? It's changed significantly since the peer review. I'll probably expand the third paragraph in the creation section, but I'm more or less happy with it. Thanks! Recognizance ( talk) 19:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Auntieruth55! Could you comment on these two edit issues? bamse ( talk) 09:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Occupied France 1872.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Could you please leave a short describtion of what needs to be clarified in regards to the three points in the article you added the template clarification needed to on the articles talk page? It would make it easier for me to address the issues. Thanks, EA210269 ( talk) 03:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Actually, the intro was shit, didn't realise it was that bad. Have a look and let me know whether its any better now. I tried to provide as many English references as I could but some stuff can only be found in German sources. Let me know if you think, anything else needs fixing, I will give it a go. EA210269 ( talk) 15:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
I see that you recently listed your name at the Guild of Copy Editors. I was wondering if you would be interested in copyediting Oklahoma City bombing. I have been working on this article for several years, and have already had several people look at it. I believe it would benefit from another set of eyes before heading off to FAC. The article is long, and if you only want to review a portion, that would still be helpful. If you're busy, no worries, there's a long list of other editors to choose from. Let me know if you have any questions. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 07:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
I have removed the speedy deletion tag that User:Christopher Kraus mistakenly placed on the GA review page and left a note on his talk page I have also fixed the transclusion to the article talk page and removed the article from the backlog list at WP:GAN. Jezhotwells ( talk) 21:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Huge article with lots of information, would like it to go on GA sometime. Can you help copyedit it? thanks.Teeninvestor (talk) 23:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
The
May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
22:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Guten Morgen! Wie geht's? Ich habe Ihre Mitteilung gelesen. Wenn man willst, einen Kandidat zu entfernen, muss man nur die Seite wie normal bearbeiten (zum Beispiel hier), aber TonyTheTiger hat es schon gemacht. Alles klar? - weebiloobil ( talk) 09:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Auntieruth55, thank you for all your work at the Good Article wikiproject. Please remember, though, to use edit summaries when you edit the GAN page (for promoting/failing an article, starting a review, etc.). Thank you, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 21:32, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Okay, give me a bit and I'll get to work on the probelms. I wrote that article two months ago and since have been able to expand my knowledge of the layout of championships.-- Will C 00:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Just wanted to say thanks for your second opinion on Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone - it was very helpful, though I'm not sure we've convinced the nominator. Ricardiana ( talk) 20:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Germany --
Hi, I will be able to give the article a look over, but it will probably be a couple of days before I find the time. At first glace, I think that although the article is very long it is of the length required for a topic of this complexity and importance. I also feel that while there are a lot of sections this is not necessarily a problem, although I wouldn't add any more as this could cause confusion.-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 06:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Furst Bismarck (1).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn ( talk) 21:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Auntieruth55 -- I thought you'd like to know that I passed the article as a GA. Congratulations on your hard work - sorry the process was a bit of a pain. Best, Ricardiana ( talk) 03:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Germania-monument.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
I was reading this article about the 140th and discovered it was "orphaned" -- although it has a lot of links, not many pages link to it. In looking at the article on Chancellorsville, it seemed that this is one place to add a link -- and then, I was looking for the order of battle, and didn't find it. Will you be adding one? -- Auntieruth55 ( talk) 00:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome. - Jmabel | Talk 00:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Jmabel, I'm in a quandary about the German unification article. It needed a lot of work, and I read your comments on its discussion page. I've done a bit of "tweeking" I guess you could call it...it's vastly longer, and more elaborate. I'm confused about what else to do, however, how to get it "approved," etc., and then what? as an experienced wikipedia person, can you help me? It is on my user page.... Auntieruth55 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC).
Thanks very much for your help. I'll plug it in and see what happens. I used myown user page because Ididn't know what else to do. :) Auntieruth55 ( talk) 00:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Kusma ( talk) has now fixed the template for the WP:GER assessment; so the article should now show class=B. You might want to request assessment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment#Requests for assessment.-- Boson ( talk) 20:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm no expert on the GA/FA process; perhaps Jmabel or Casliber can give better advice. I would tend to let the peer review run for a while. I think nomination for GA or FA normally terminates peer review. Personally, I would tend to skip GA and go straight for FA. I haven't yet found time to have a closer look at the article again, but I would mention a few things:
I've revised some of the article German Unification and posted my revisions, per the suggestion of another user. I had asked for peer review, but apparently that will happen regardless. My students use this site, so I had checked on it to see what they were quoting/misquoting (often misquoting). Auntieruth55 ( talk) 01:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Got it. Genuinely done, for tonight at least. I'll take a look at what you've done in the morning! Now I'm going to work on the dissertation. Thanks for all your help! 01:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I went through and did a pretty comprehensive copyedit. I can tell that you know the material better than I, so while I've alerted the relevant WikiProject and someone should eventually review from that angle, I pretty much stayed out of anything substantive.
Do please see a couple of questions I asked at the bottom of Talk:Unification of Germany. Thanks for all your work on this. - Jmabel | Talk 18:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome, Auntieruth55, to the WikiProject Germany! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Germany-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{ WikiProject Germany}}. A few features that you might find helpful:
A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Here are some tasks you can do. Please remove completed tasks from the list.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! Agathoclea ( talk) 18:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 23:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your post on the WikiProject Germany talk page. Quite a lot of templates do work on English Wiki and there is at least one clever dual language one. But if it doesn't what I usually do is find the English Wiki equivalent and put in a redirect from the German template name. Then change the field names with data in them to their English template equivalent (see Selbitz River). But you can go further. I copied a complex German template for locomotives ( Template:Infobox Schienenfahrzeug and Prussian P 8) into English Wiki and only changed the displayed field name. So in effect it translates it automatically. You can even get it to recognise and translate data if they are predictable (see Template:Bahnhof and Hof Hauptbahnhof). But I'm no expert and it's taken a degree of trial and error! Gruß, Paul. -- Bermicourt ( talk) 20:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
The
April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
22:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm here and not Unification of Germany because I'm only asking for my own curiosity: does civil war have a different meaning in German than in English or is this particular war considered a civil war because wars between similar peoples even though under different governments counts as civil wars? The War of 1812 between US and Great Britain not a civil war but the American Revolution could be considered one. It's late, I hope this makes sense to you. Nitpyck ( talk) 05:29, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you so much. So often the fine details are blurred in translation. Nitpyck ( talk) 03:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate your comments about the article and I'm working on fixing them right now. I wanted to ask you if you thought I should even include the last bit about after the credits. I don't think it really helps the plot and the Nicole character was in the film for about a minute before that point. Also the theme has a revenge part about it because he wants to get revenge on his family's killer. You want that in the lead? -- Peppage tlk 00:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Welcome, Auntieruth55, to the Former countries WikiProject! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on a formerly existing country, state, or territory, please tag their talk page with our project template {{ WPFC}}. Here are a few features that you might find helpful:
And here are some tasks you can do:
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! Laurinavicius ( talk) 19:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
I have the page watched. my name inc Ottoman project 00:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Wasn't sure if you were watching Wikipedia:Peer review/Ostend Manifesto/archive1 since the other reviewer stated he wouldn't be, so I figured I'd leave you a note here. Thanks for your insightful comments. I had completely reorganised it and wasn't sure where I was going with the dilemma section, but I think I'll move the Black Warrior into it (retitled "Pierce administration") and move some of the stuff about the preceding administrations up to the context section. I have it at User:Recognizance/Sandbox and intend to incorporate the PR suggestions while I'm performing the surgery; feel free to edit it like a normal article.
The part I'm concerned about is the Caribbean "angle" because I don't think I've come across anything directly mentioning that so far. (I did come across a humorously titled book called Manifest manhood and the antebellum American empire though.) Do you think having the opinions of the Cuban populace would be enough? There's plenty of discussion of that. Recognizance ( talk) 05:27, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ruth. Would you mind giving the article a second look? It's changed significantly since the peer review. I'll probably expand the third paragraph in the creation section, but I'm more or less happy with it. Thanks! Recognizance ( talk) 19:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Auntieruth55! Could you comment on these two edit issues? bamse ( talk) 09:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Occupied France 1872.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Could you please leave a short describtion of what needs to be clarified in regards to the three points in the article you added the template clarification needed to on the articles talk page? It would make it easier for me to address the issues. Thanks, EA210269 ( talk) 03:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Actually, the intro was shit, didn't realise it was that bad. Have a look and let me know whether its any better now. I tried to provide as many English references as I could but some stuff can only be found in German sources. Let me know if you think, anything else needs fixing, I will give it a go. EA210269 ( talk) 15:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
I see that you recently listed your name at the Guild of Copy Editors. I was wondering if you would be interested in copyediting Oklahoma City bombing. I have been working on this article for several years, and have already had several people look at it. I believe it would benefit from another set of eyes before heading off to FAC. The article is long, and if you only want to review a portion, that would still be helpful. If you're busy, no worries, there's a long list of other editors to choose from. Let me know if you have any questions. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 07:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
I have removed the speedy deletion tag that User:Christopher Kraus mistakenly placed on the GA review page and left a note on his talk page I have also fixed the transclusion to the article talk page and removed the article from the backlog list at WP:GAN. Jezhotwells ( talk) 21:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Huge article with lots of information, would like it to go on GA sometime. Can you help copyedit it? thanks.Teeninvestor (talk) 23:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
The
May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
22:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Guten Morgen! Wie geht's? Ich habe Ihre Mitteilung gelesen. Wenn man willst, einen Kandidat zu entfernen, muss man nur die Seite wie normal bearbeiten (zum Beispiel hier), aber TonyTheTiger hat es schon gemacht. Alles klar? - weebiloobil ( talk) 09:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Auntieruth55, thank you for all your work at the Good Article wikiproject. Please remember, though, to use edit summaries when you edit the GAN page (for promoting/failing an article, starting a review, etc.). Thank you, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 21:32, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Okay, give me a bit and I'll get to work on the probelms. I wrote that article two months ago and since have been able to expand my knowledge of the layout of championships.-- Will C 00:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Just wanted to say thanks for your second opinion on Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone - it was very helpful, though I'm not sure we've convinced the nominator. Ricardiana ( talk) 20:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Germany --
Hi, I will be able to give the article a look over, but it will probably be a couple of days before I find the time. At first glace, I think that although the article is very long it is of the length required for a topic of this complexity and importance. I also feel that while there are a lot of sections this is not necessarily a problem, although I wouldn't add any more as this could cause confusion.-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 06:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Furst Bismarck (1).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn ( talk) 21:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Auntieruth55 -- I thought you'd like to know that I passed the article as a GA. Congratulations on your hard work - sorry the process was a bit of a pain. Best, Ricardiana ( talk) 03:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Germania-monument.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
I was reading this article about the 140th and discovered it was "orphaned" -- although it has a lot of links, not many pages link to it. In looking at the article on Chancellorsville, it seemed that this is one place to add a link -- and then, I was looking for the order of battle, and didn't find it. Will you be adding one? -- Auntieruth55 ( talk) 00:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |