This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | → | Archive 45 |
If all you want is the deletion of certain revisions (i.e. you don't mind them being visible to admins), I can do it for you. Just tell me (whether by Special:EmailUser or with a message at my talk) the pages and the times and dates of the edits you'd like to be deleted. I can't delete just those edits, but I can delete the page itself restore it minus the edits you don't want. Nyttend ( talk) 04:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Astro. I am generally supportive of your motives and additions. However, you added an external link to the Amundsen sea article that refered to Pine Island Glacier as if it was on an island. I don't want to go around reverting your additions because I understand that this is a difficult subject for the media to get right but please please go a little deeper on the research and I can help with explanations before you add to these articles. I promise you I am not trying to censor anything. Even if I disagree with some of the science I will not censor its addition to wikipedia so long as it is not seriously demonstrably wrong.. Polargeo ( talk) 10:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Good call. GnarlyLikeWhoa ( talk) 23:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | → | Archive 45 |
If all you want is the deletion of certain revisions (i.e. you don't mind them being visible to admins), I can do it for you. Just tell me (whether by Special:EmailUser or with a message at my talk) the pages and the times and dates of the edits you'd like to be deleted. I can't delete just those edits, but I can delete the page itself restore it minus the edits you don't want. Nyttend ( talk) 04:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Astro. I am generally supportive of your motives and additions. However, you added an external link to the Amundsen sea article that refered to Pine Island Glacier as if it was on an island. I don't want to go around reverting your additions because I understand that this is a difficult subject for the media to get right but please please go a little deeper on the research and I can help with explanations before you add to these articles. I promise you I am not trying to censor anything. Even if I disagree with some of the science I will not censor its addition to wikipedia so long as it is not seriously demonstrably wrong.. Polargeo ( talk) 10:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Good call. GnarlyLikeWhoa ( talk) 23:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)