{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Drmies (
talk)
16:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC){{unblock | reason=I don't appear to have done any of the things listed in not here to build an encyclopedia.All my contributions are constructive. Aspflcn ( talk) 17:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)}
You've removed a large sourced block of text twice. The first time was reverted by @ DefendingPages: who correctly stated that the sources were used elsewhere in the article and that there was nothing wrong with them. I reverted you the second time. If you feel that there is an issue with these sources, explain those issues on the article talk page rather than reverting. If there is a good reason to remove the text or, preferably, a need to find other sources, it can be discussed there. It seems to be overkill to remove a large section of sourced text because one editor claims the sources are flawed. Read WP:RS and build an argument for the removal of those sources. The section on war crimes against civilians had some problems so I removed that as well. I don't argue against inclusion of that information, just the way it was worded (and we need to make sure the sources can be verified as these topics tend to inflame national and ethnic feelings. We need to get it right. Thanks. freshacconci (✉) 15:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Drmies (
talk)
16:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC){{unblock | reason=I don't appear to have done any of the things listed in not here to build an encyclopedia.All my contributions are constructive. Aspflcn ( talk) 17:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)}
You've removed a large sourced block of text twice. The first time was reverted by @ DefendingPages: who correctly stated that the sources were used elsewhere in the article and that there was nothing wrong with them. I reverted you the second time. If you feel that there is an issue with these sources, explain those issues on the article talk page rather than reverting. If there is a good reason to remove the text or, preferably, a need to find other sources, it can be discussed there. It seems to be overkill to remove a large section of sourced text because one editor claims the sources are flawed. Read WP:RS and build an argument for the removal of those sources. The section on war crimes against civilians had some problems so I removed that as well. I don't argue against inclusion of that information, just the way it was worded (and we need to make sure the sources can be verified as these topics tend to inflame national and ethnic feelings. We need to get it right. Thanks. freshacconci (✉) 15:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)