Hello Asimo1987, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to
Notre Dame of Tacurong College have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Asimo1987. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Notre Dame of Tacurong College, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 14:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove the {{
copyviocore}} template from articles, as you did with
Notre Dame of Tacurong College. Your action has been reverted. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept non-
free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at
Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the
Creative Commons and
GFDL licenses, as detailed at
WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at
Talk:Notre Dame of Tacurong College/Temp. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators and/or removers of the copyright notice templates may be
blocked from editing.
ChamithN
(talk)
07:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. You also asked me whether you can request the page to be deleted entirely. Well yes, if you have a valid rationale, you can do so by following the steps mentioned in WP:HOWTODELETE. But, given that the article has been on Wikipedia since 2009, I suggest you try and improve the article instead. Familiarizing yourself with WP:5P, WP:NOT, and Wikipedia:Writing better articles would be a good starting point. But, more importantly, you should refrain from removing the {{ copyvio-revdel}} template until those specific revisions are deleted. Cheers! -- ChamithN (talk) 08:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Notre dame of tacurong college.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 17:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Notre dame of tacurong college.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Asimo1987, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to
Notre Dame of Tacurong College have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Asimo1987. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Notre Dame of Tacurong College, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 14:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove the {{
copyviocore}} template from articles, as you did with
Notre Dame of Tacurong College. Your action has been reverted. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept non-
free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at
Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the
Creative Commons and
GFDL licenses, as detailed at
WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at
Talk:Notre Dame of Tacurong College/Temp. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators and/or removers of the copyright notice templates may be
blocked from editing.
ChamithN
(talk)
07:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. You also asked me whether you can request the page to be deleted entirely. Well yes, if you have a valid rationale, you can do so by following the steps mentioned in WP:HOWTODELETE. But, given that the article has been on Wikipedia since 2009, I suggest you try and improve the article instead. Familiarizing yourself with WP:5P, WP:NOT, and Wikipedia:Writing better articles would be a good starting point. But, more importantly, you should refrain from removing the {{ copyvio-revdel}} template until those specific revisions are deleted. Cheers! -- ChamithN (talk) 08:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Notre dame of tacurong college.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 17:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Notre dame of tacurong college.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)