![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
As a member of
WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the
project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's
coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
02:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
The work of Satwant Pasricha has nothing to do with SIkh religion or any religion for that purpose. I am going to remove all references to religion, also it should not be a Sikh biography stub...what do you think ? Please reply on my talk page...thanks Jon Ascton ( talk) 17:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Hello! Your username is listed on the Indian cinema task force participants list, but your user contributions show no activity within the past 18 months. Consequently, we've taken your name off of the list. If you still consider yourself an active editor of the task force, we encourage you to please add your name back to the Active Members list. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 22:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Arundhati bakshi! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as
Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
865 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 21:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Soccer shcs.jpg is still missing description details after an extended period and/or other details on its image description page.
This information is IMPORTANT so please try add this information if possible, or seek assistance.
If the information remains missing, the image WILL eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Soccer_shcs.jpg Arundhati (I hope it is your real name) are you one kicking the ball Jon Ascton (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Old Souls, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Souls. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist ( talk) 15:27, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
I want to thank you for the site on Lawrence Hope. When I was 13 I found a 1925 version in my basement amongst thing that used to belong to my grand mother. Since then I have managed to get the other two collections but could never find out anything more. Never in the libraries, perhaps once found on a libraries data base. I imagined it was a English man who lived in India and was never quite sure it was a collection of a few poets because of the many titles. The style varied a little but you could see them all coming from the same person as well. Imagine my surprise finding out he was a she and that she had tried to pass it off as a collection of translations. She got me into writing and I still remember the impact that "men should be judged" had on my 13 year old mind. Funny Enough, I had the name listed on Facebook, it recently connected it to your site and made a page. I am proud to be the one and only fan. Miss you made my month. Thanks again. G. Preisel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.83.155.249 ( talk) 09:19, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
A discussion has begun about whether the article Wisdom Christianity, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisdom Christianity until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Resident Anthropologist ( talk) 03:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shamika Brown. Since you had some involvement with the Shamika Brown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Off2riorob ( talk) 16:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Preciousdoe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Preciousdoe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 02:33, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milton Hallman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milton Hallman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The article Suncoast Seabird Sanctuary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
21:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
As a member of
WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the
project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's
coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
02:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
The work of Satwant Pasricha has nothing to do with SIkh religion or any religion for that purpose. I am going to remove all references to religion, also it should not be a Sikh biography stub...what do you think ? Please reply on my talk page...thanks Jon Ascton ( talk) 17:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Hello! Your username is listed on the Indian cinema task force participants list, but your user contributions show no activity within the past 18 months. Consequently, we've taken your name off of the list. If you still consider yourself an active editor of the task force, we encourage you to please add your name back to the Active Members list. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 22:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Arundhati bakshi! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as
Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
865 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 21:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Soccer shcs.jpg is still missing description details after an extended period and/or other details on its image description page.
This information is IMPORTANT so please try add this information if possible, or seek assistance.
If the information remains missing, the image WILL eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 01:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Soccer_shcs.jpg Arundhati (I hope it is your real name) are you one kicking the ball Jon Ascton (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Old Souls, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Souls. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist ( talk) 15:27, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
I want to thank you for the site on Lawrence Hope. When I was 13 I found a 1925 version in my basement amongst thing that used to belong to my grand mother. Since then I have managed to get the other two collections but could never find out anything more. Never in the libraries, perhaps once found on a libraries data base. I imagined it was a English man who lived in India and was never quite sure it was a collection of a few poets because of the many titles. The style varied a little but you could see them all coming from the same person as well. Imagine my surprise finding out he was a she and that she had tried to pass it off as a collection of translations. She got me into writing and I still remember the impact that "men should be judged" had on my 13 year old mind. Funny Enough, I had the name listed on Facebook, it recently connected it to your site and made a page. I am proud to be the one and only fan. Miss you made my month. Thanks again. G. Preisel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.83.155.249 ( talk) 09:19, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
A discussion has begun about whether the article Wisdom Christianity, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisdom Christianity until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Resident Anthropologist ( talk) 03:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shamika Brown. Since you had some involvement with the Shamika Brown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Off2riorob ( talk) 16:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Preciousdoe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Preciousdoe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 02:33, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milton Hallman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milton Hallman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The article Suncoast Seabird Sanctuary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Hama Dryad (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
21:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)