This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".
A few features that you might find helpful:
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/ (Desk) 08:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:7205304.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for my first Barnstar, man! It made my day! (Yeah, I've that dull a real life =P) UnaLaguna 20:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the barnstar! -- Hemlock Martinis 06:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar! It's nice to know that one's work is appreciated. -- Arctic Gnome ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
If you want to edit your user page, it would make more sense if you logged in and edited. NHRHS2010 Talk 22:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
You may wish to take a look at Category:Wikipedia cleanup and/or Wikipedia:Requested articles, and select an article or two that you could work on. While barnstars, kindness and such are wonderful, it is important to keep in mind that the primary reason we are here is to write an encyclopedia, and gain some experience doing the drudgework - of course patrolling for vandalism is important too, but I suggest you get some significant experience in writing as well, even if you feel your talents and skills are stronger in other areas. KillerChihuahua ?!? 15:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
(outdent) I suggest you remove the "spoiler warning" tags from Dogland. They are redundant with "Plot summary" and in any case, non-encyclopedic. Any article on a work of fiction will contain what is commonly described as "spoilers" - and Wikipedia is not a forum. If one looks up a work of fiction in an encyclopedia, one expects to see plot details. KillerChihuahua ?!? 11:10, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
I nicked the formatting and code from your userpage, changed the colours and a few other things, and came up with a considerably more different userpage for myself (my previous userpage was just... yeuch). Hopefully it does itself justice as a tribute to your page. UnaLaguna 20:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
The June 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 14:39, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
This is the sig you had: [[User:Arknascar44|Arknascar44]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Arknascar44|'''¡Hablar conmigo!''']]</sup> for pasting it in your signature box. KillerChihuahua ?!? 22:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you left a third opinion for Talk:Need for Speed series characters#Spoiler warning and "fair use gallery" (good work, BTW), but you didn't remove the request from the list of Active disagreements. Feel free to do so once you've given an opinion; while it's by no means required, the usual edit summary is along the lines of "opinion given, 3 left".
Welcome to Wikipedia:Third opinion! Anomie 16:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Doglandcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for welcoming users! I just have a small suggestion. Please do not welcome users with names like User:PandaWhore, as they are violations of the username policy. Please remember to report such users to the administrators by posting a report on Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention. Thank you. Happy editing! Yours sincerely, Eddie 01:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
What on earth gave you the idea that this was a "test edit?" If you don't like it in a table, fine - just say so. Maybe take out the extraneous pipes while you're at it. - Pete 19:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to know why you reverted another editor's edit on the above page and then warned them about vandalism? Not only was their edit not vandalism, it improved the article. I know, I started the article and was simply too lazy to take the time to put the information into a table. No information was changed or removed, so again why would you revert the edit (I have since reverted your revert) and warn an editor? Aboutmovies 19:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
To Aboutmovies and Pete:
I apologize for the mistake. This will not happen again, and further, I assure you that I was acting in good faith and will keep this error in the back of my mind constantly to ensure this will not reoccur. Thank you for pointing out my folly, so that others may not share your pain at being warned for no reason. Once again, I thank you. Arknascar44 ¡Hablar Conmigo! 19:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
There has been an editing war going on at this page. I have atempted to find sources (almost all sources on the page are ones I have cited) for a recent deletion to taglines. As per Wikiguidlines the section was re-writen in the form of a paragraph and not a list. I feel the taglines mentioned are note worthy and have located sources to back up my assertion, yet a single editor is still arguing and making broad over reaching statements that are not in good faith, and are not backed up by Wiki policy. While I wish everyone to be envolved I believe the member Atropos, is not acting in good faith or editing in a nuetral manner. If I am wrong about this could you explain why. A consensus is being attempted yet he refuses to allow time for the discussion and has even become bitter about the inclusion that several editors have agreed on. This is becoming a serious problem. I am truely at my wits end about the situation. Please help! -- Amadscientist 08:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Arknascar44. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you have only been editing for just over a month.
Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel 08:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
The July 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 16:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Shweet! Thanks! :) - WarthogDemon 00:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I'm sorry to bother you, but as a LoCE member, I just wondered if you would be willing to have a look through the Shaw and Crompton article. It is currently a Featured Article Candidate and needs a copy-edit for grammar by someone who hasn't yet seen it. Any other ways to improve the article would also be welcome. Thank you very much, if you can. Epbr123 12:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
I have recently become entangled in a situation which developed primarily on Talk:American Family Association (and associated edit war on the article), now archived to Talk:American Family Association/Archive 1. I have given basic background and some links to difs on WP:ANI#Mentors wanted (no, nobody is interested apparently) and there is more to the tale on the contributor's talk page. Here is your chance to be brilliant! I request criticism of my approach, and suggestions for how to proceed. This will have a double benefit: while I can critique your comprehension and methodology, I will gain the benefit of your critique and ideas. And we may reap a triple benefit, if the editor in question can learn here as well. I look forward to your thoughts on the matter - please post here so as to keep the discussion intact. Thanks much - KillerChihuahua ?!? 14:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Your first comment to LAEC was very well put. The only problem I have with it is that you called him a troll, which is certainly acceptable under WP:TROLL, which states "When a user, in a conflict of any sort, insists on the letter of a rule while grossly violating its spirit", e.g. misinterpreting WP:VANDAL#NPOV Disputes (if only a little), but perhaps you could've assumed good faith for a bit longer. I know this is a bit of a stretch, considering the numerous vandalism accusations that were made, but, when it all comes down to it, he was trying to insert what he thought was NPOV and factual information into the article. He just got a bit carried away by all the excitement (though this in no way excuses his actions). Still, not accusing a troll of being one might've stopped things from getting worse.
Your block, along with reasoning, was completely justified and fair. You followed the blocking policy without any violations. It could be said that you were involved in the content dispute, but, IMHO, you weren't. You weren't disputing content, just the behavior of LAEC. So, your block leaves me with nothing to critique =).
Well...this one's a bit tricky. You're dealing with a big temper, so an accusation, in my opinion, is not the way to go. You need to tell the user that you meant no harm, but that they needed to understand blatant personal attacks, even ones they think are based on a policy that allows them to say such things, are not allowed. Instead, they should assume that other editors were doing what they thought was right. Also, tell them you understand that they were only trying to insert correct information into the article, but that they need to understand the article is the community's article, not theirs, and they need to acknowledge others' opinions, even if they don't agree with them. In addition, they need to thouroughly read WP:CIVIL and learn how to deal with an opinion they don't agree with, and how to cite policy without harassing other editors. As for the content dispute, if they can understand civility, it shouldn't be an issue. Besides, it shouldn't be your problem, since the only problem you're trying to fix is LAEC's behavior, not a category debate. Fixing his behavior will probably fix the content issue, anyway :)
Thanks for the heart. :) - WarthogDemon 20:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Arknascar44! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. ∆ 22:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the little hart icon! It's always nice to be loved :-) Happy editing! -- Boricua e ddie 23:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Dear Arky, I have no words to say how deeply the wonderful magic you've woven onto me has moved me. kndness has a secret value in itself that far supasses what most people realize, one that you grasp with ease, and that makes you special. For that, You have my deepest admiration, and from this day on, my friendship. Love, |
How do you set up the design for a cabal, you know like the heart at the top of a page or penguin. I tried to ask that Ryulong but he was just joking around. Lighthead 22:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
{{#switch: {{SUBJECTSPACE}} | User = <div style="right:10px; top:5px;" class="metadata topicon" id="cabal"> <imagemap> Image:image name here|20px|alternate text (write something related to the cabal) rect 0 0 128 128 [[name of cabal page|text to display when the icon is moused over]] desc none </imagemap></div> | User talk = <div style="right:10px; top:5px;" class="metadata topicon" id="cabal"> <imagemap> Image:same image as above|20px|same alternate text as above rect 0 0 128 128 [[same name of cabal page as above|same text to display when the icon is moused over as above]] desc none </imagemap></div> | }}
<noinclude> Whatever you want to say on the page </noinclude>
Just wondering how you made the cool sig for talk pages and such. Been trying to make one on my own and well it is not working. O and good luck on your anit-vandal group. Phoenix741 01:45, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed you're involved in the Spanish-to-English translations project. I'd like to get involved as well, but am not sure how to begin. I have translated two pages ( Cucuta Deportivo and Magico Gonzalez, but would like expand my involvement as well as include further pages. I was hoping you had advice on how to do this. Both pages I translated are, of course, in need of proofreading as I'm only human (sigh) so advice on that would be great too. Thanks in advance Isaiahcambron 18:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
The August 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by
grafikbot
13:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I see that you've offered User:Melloss adoption, but you didn't change the {{ adoptme}} template to {{ adoptoffer}}. I've done it for you, but it'd be helpful if you'd try to remember to do this in the future. Thanks. -- Sopoforic 01:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
is there anything of importance to other users on my talkpage? and why should i not be "allowed" to remove old cruft? -- ∂ 09:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
btw, have a look at Image:Arknascar44_talkpage.png -- does the big smilie obscure the toolbox and the text on your talkpage on purpose? imho it's a little bit annoying. -- ∂ 10:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
OrphanBot left a note at User Talk:Crassic saying that the above mentioned image lacked an image tag. However, approximately one hour after the tag was added [3] OrphanBot still notified User:Crassic about the tagging issue [4] even though the tag was added after OrphanBot tagged the image as untagged [5]. Is there a way to stop the bot from notifying a user after the tag has been added, but before it edits the user's talk page? Thanks, and happy editing, Arky ¡Hablar! 00:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".
A few features that you might find helpful:
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/ (Desk) 08:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:7205304.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for my first Barnstar, man! It made my day! (Yeah, I've that dull a real life =P) UnaLaguna 20:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the barnstar! -- Hemlock Martinis 06:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar! It's nice to know that one's work is appreciated. -- Arctic Gnome ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
If you want to edit your user page, it would make more sense if you logged in and edited. NHRHS2010 Talk 22:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
You may wish to take a look at Category:Wikipedia cleanup and/or Wikipedia:Requested articles, and select an article or two that you could work on. While barnstars, kindness and such are wonderful, it is important to keep in mind that the primary reason we are here is to write an encyclopedia, and gain some experience doing the drudgework - of course patrolling for vandalism is important too, but I suggest you get some significant experience in writing as well, even if you feel your talents and skills are stronger in other areas. KillerChihuahua ?!? 15:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
(outdent) I suggest you remove the "spoiler warning" tags from Dogland. They are redundant with "Plot summary" and in any case, non-encyclopedic. Any article on a work of fiction will contain what is commonly described as "spoilers" - and Wikipedia is not a forum. If one looks up a work of fiction in an encyclopedia, one expects to see plot details. KillerChihuahua ?!? 11:10, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
I nicked the formatting and code from your userpage, changed the colours and a few other things, and came up with a considerably more different userpage for myself (my previous userpage was just... yeuch). Hopefully it does itself justice as a tribute to your page. UnaLaguna 20:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
The June 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 14:39, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
This is the sig you had: [[User:Arknascar44|Arknascar44]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Arknascar44|'''¡Hablar conmigo!''']]</sup> for pasting it in your signature box. KillerChihuahua ?!? 22:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you left a third opinion for Talk:Need for Speed series characters#Spoiler warning and "fair use gallery" (good work, BTW), but you didn't remove the request from the list of Active disagreements. Feel free to do so once you've given an opinion; while it's by no means required, the usual edit summary is along the lines of "opinion given, 3 left".
Welcome to Wikipedia:Third opinion! Anomie 16:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Doglandcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for welcoming users! I just have a small suggestion. Please do not welcome users with names like User:PandaWhore, as they are violations of the username policy. Please remember to report such users to the administrators by posting a report on Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention. Thank you. Happy editing! Yours sincerely, Eddie 01:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
What on earth gave you the idea that this was a "test edit?" If you don't like it in a table, fine - just say so. Maybe take out the extraneous pipes while you're at it. - Pete 19:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to know why you reverted another editor's edit on the above page and then warned them about vandalism? Not only was their edit not vandalism, it improved the article. I know, I started the article and was simply too lazy to take the time to put the information into a table. No information was changed or removed, so again why would you revert the edit (I have since reverted your revert) and warn an editor? Aboutmovies 19:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
To Aboutmovies and Pete:
I apologize for the mistake. This will not happen again, and further, I assure you that I was acting in good faith and will keep this error in the back of my mind constantly to ensure this will not reoccur. Thank you for pointing out my folly, so that others may not share your pain at being warned for no reason. Once again, I thank you. Arknascar44 ¡Hablar Conmigo! 19:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
There has been an editing war going on at this page. I have atempted to find sources (almost all sources on the page are ones I have cited) for a recent deletion to taglines. As per Wikiguidlines the section was re-writen in the form of a paragraph and not a list. I feel the taglines mentioned are note worthy and have located sources to back up my assertion, yet a single editor is still arguing and making broad over reaching statements that are not in good faith, and are not backed up by Wiki policy. While I wish everyone to be envolved I believe the member Atropos, is not acting in good faith or editing in a nuetral manner. If I am wrong about this could you explain why. A consensus is being attempted yet he refuses to allow time for the discussion and has even become bitter about the inclusion that several editors have agreed on. This is becoming a serious problem. I am truely at my wits end about the situation. Please help! -- Amadscientist 08:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Arknascar44. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you have only been editing for just over a month.
Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel 08:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
The July 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 16:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Shweet! Thanks! :) - WarthogDemon 00:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I'm sorry to bother you, but as a LoCE member, I just wondered if you would be willing to have a look through the Shaw and Crompton article. It is currently a Featured Article Candidate and needs a copy-edit for grammar by someone who hasn't yet seen it. Any other ways to improve the article would also be welcome. Thank you very much, if you can. Epbr123 12:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
I have recently become entangled in a situation which developed primarily on Talk:American Family Association (and associated edit war on the article), now archived to Talk:American Family Association/Archive 1. I have given basic background and some links to difs on WP:ANI#Mentors wanted (no, nobody is interested apparently) and there is more to the tale on the contributor's talk page. Here is your chance to be brilliant! I request criticism of my approach, and suggestions for how to proceed. This will have a double benefit: while I can critique your comprehension and methodology, I will gain the benefit of your critique and ideas. And we may reap a triple benefit, if the editor in question can learn here as well. I look forward to your thoughts on the matter - please post here so as to keep the discussion intact. Thanks much - KillerChihuahua ?!? 14:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Your first comment to LAEC was very well put. The only problem I have with it is that you called him a troll, which is certainly acceptable under WP:TROLL, which states "When a user, in a conflict of any sort, insists on the letter of a rule while grossly violating its spirit", e.g. misinterpreting WP:VANDAL#NPOV Disputes (if only a little), but perhaps you could've assumed good faith for a bit longer. I know this is a bit of a stretch, considering the numerous vandalism accusations that were made, but, when it all comes down to it, he was trying to insert what he thought was NPOV and factual information into the article. He just got a bit carried away by all the excitement (though this in no way excuses his actions). Still, not accusing a troll of being one might've stopped things from getting worse.
Your block, along with reasoning, was completely justified and fair. You followed the blocking policy without any violations. It could be said that you were involved in the content dispute, but, IMHO, you weren't. You weren't disputing content, just the behavior of LAEC. So, your block leaves me with nothing to critique =).
Well...this one's a bit tricky. You're dealing with a big temper, so an accusation, in my opinion, is not the way to go. You need to tell the user that you meant no harm, but that they needed to understand blatant personal attacks, even ones they think are based on a policy that allows them to say such things, are not allowed. Instead, they should assume that other editors were doing what they thought was right. Also, tell them you understand that they were only trying to insert correct information into the article, but that they need to understand the article is the community's article, not theirs, and they need to acknowledge others' opinions, even if they don't agree with them. In addition, they need to thouroughly read WP:CIVIL and learn how to deal with an opinion they don't agree with, and how to cite policy without harassing other editors. As for the content dispute, if they can understand civility, it shouldn't be an issue. Besides, it shouldn't be your problem, since the only problem you're trying to fix is LAEC's behavior, not a category debate. Fixing his behavior will probably fix the content issue, anyway :)
Thanks for the heart. :) - WarthogDemon 20:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Arknascar44! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. ∆ 22:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the little hart icon! It's always nice to be loved :-) Happy editing! -- Boricua e ddie 23:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Dear Arky, I have no words to say how deeply the wonderful magic you've woven onto me has moved me. kndness has a secret value in itself that far supasses what most people realize, one that you grasp with ease, and that makes you special. For that, You have my deepest admiration, and from this day on, my friendship. Love, |
How do you set up the design for a cabal, you know like the heart at the top of a page or penguin. I tried to ask that Ryulong but he was just joking around. Lighthead 22:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
{{#switch: {{SUBJECTSPACE}} | User = <div style="right:10px; top:5px;" class="metadata topicon" id="cabal"> <imagemap> Image:image name here|20px|alternate text (write something related to the cabal) rect 0 0 128 128 [[name of cabal page|text to display when the icon is moused over]] desc none </imagemap></div> | User talk = <div style="right:10px; top:5px;" class="metadata topicon" id="cabal"> <imagemap> Image:same image as above|20px|same alternate text as above rect 0 0 128 128 [[same name of cabal page as above|same text to display when the icon is moused over as above]] desc none </imagemap></div> | }}
<noinclude> Whatever you want to say on the page </noinclude>
Just wondering how you made the cool sig for talk pages and such. Been trying to make one on my own and well it is not working. O and good luck on your anit-vandal group. Phoenix741 01:45, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed you're involved in the Spanish-to-English translations project. I'd like to get involved as well, but am not sure how to begin. I have translated two pages ( Cucuta Deportivo and Magico Gonzalez, but would like expand my involvement as well as include further pages. I was hoping you had advice on how to do this. Both pages I translated are, of course, in need of proofreading as I'm only human (sigh) so advice on that would be great too. Thanks in advance Isaiahcambron 18:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
The August 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by
grafikbot
13:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I see that you've offered User:Melloss adoption, but you didn't change the {{ adoptme}} template to {{ adoptoffer}}. I've done it for you, but it'd be helpful if you'd try to remember to do this in the future. Thanks. -- Sopoforic 01:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
is there anything of importance to other users on my talkpage? and why should i not be "allowed" to remove old cruft? -- ∂ 09:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
btw, have a look at Image:Arknascar44_talkpage.png -- does the big smilie obscure the toolbox and the text on your talkpage on purpose? imho it's a little bit annoying. -- ∂ 10:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
OrphanBot left a note at User Talk:Crassic saying that the above mentioned image lacked an image tag. However, approximately one hour after the tag was added [3] OrphanBot still notified User:Crassic about the tagging issue [4] even though the tag was added after OrphanBot tagged the image as untagged [5]. Is there a way to stop the bot from notifying a user after the tag has been added, but before it edits the user's talk page? Thanks, and happy editing, Arky ¡Hablar! 00:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)