![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions for the period 2014. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I've failed the second nomination of Nintendo 2DS due to problems with the reliability of numerous sources used in the article. Please ensure that all sources have their reliability verified and are replaced as needed before renominating the article. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 14:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Greetings,
I am new to Wikipedia and for an editing assignment which I have to do for a course at university I have picked Nintendo Zone. I was wondering if you had any tips or suggestions on what I could help edit on the page that would benefit it (such as particular areas that would needs work). If you are able to provide suggestions that I could use as a starting point for the edit that would be great. Thank you very much.
XTeaBag3 ( talk) 05:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
While I like the changes to Mario and Luigi, the others are less then satisfactory. In general, the lead image of a character should not necessarily be the most recent game they appear in. It should be the art which best displays their character. Some may say even the Mario and Luigi images aren't the best, because their jumping pose. However, as the nature of their games, and the fact Mario was once called "Jumpman" I think a jumping pose is perfectly appropriate. As for Fox McCloud, you uploaded an image from Star Fox 64 3D... Although it is technically the newest Star Fox game, that is still 64 graphics, and thus his character is very simple, and not the most exemplary for his lead image. Detail > Recency. The Smash Bros Brawl artwork is generally the most detailed character artwork for most of the characters that appear in it.(mostly because half of them haven't had decent games since then) Blake ( Talk· Edits) 16:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
For tireless (yikes) copyediting, etc. Your 'thanks' for my work on List of Wii U software led me to check your intense activity on Nintendo and inspired me to do likewise! — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 08:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC) |
Where are the sources that state Nintendo Software Planning & Development actively helped on development for some of the recent games you've added to the list? Just because a producer from SPD co-produced the game doesn't mean the entire group did, unless I'm missing something. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 13:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Nintendo Barnstar | |
For hard core creative table layout, and insanely tedious mass conversions theretofore, with a touch of Japanese. Seething masses of drowning data THANK YOU! For exploring vast castles and corporate ivory towers across the seas, erasing large swaths of fog-of-war black from our map, and discovering lost levels! For good sportsmanship and granting secret power ups to your fellow players, upon which I personally thrive. I hear Wikipedia's end boss is REALLY HARD so LET'S-A-GO! 1up 1up 1up 1up 1up — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 01:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC) |
For what reason is this here? It's just duplicate info of stuff listed above it, and half of the list wasn't made by EAD anyway. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 22:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Here is my problem with the games developed on EAD wikipedia page. It's become way too bloated with unnecessary details. The main listing should serve just what games they developed. One of the biggest errors is this insistence on adding co-developer tags (several are erroneously listed at that) which isn't necessary on this page, maybe on the specific game page. The Monolith Soft "co-developer" tags are extremely inaccurate and they are plastered all over the EAD page. Monolith Soft (kyoto) is a graphic asset team that helps EAD Kyoto finish games on a production level. This means they join the development team near the end of development, and help model some NPC/objects. That's the same thing hundreds of small companies do for every game, and we don't go listing them as co-developers. Monolith Soft (Kyoto) and 1-Up Studio list themselves are support studios, as they are listed in the credits, but to say they are co-developers in disingenuous. I mean, SRD and Mario Club are equally "co-developers" of all those Monolith Soft support games listed for EAD. See my point? Games like Steel Diver, Star Fox 64 3D, NES Remix are true examples of co-developed EAD games since they were 50/50. But several of the others, are not. NOAWiki ( talk) 03:26, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
@ Arkhandar:What sections are relevant is likely subjective. What is verifiable however is not. Everything in the previous version of the page had a link which I believe would make it verifiable. All the articles are linked and all the info is legitimate. Can you explain why this info is not relevant or "advertising"? Yanninski ( talk) 18:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Hey there, brother. Do you happen to know what was the role of intelligent systems on this section? We don't just want a bare list WP:NOTDIR. I wrote that generic lead sentence in that section just to have something as better than nothing. All I found is their Japanese page shown there, and I couldn't find any information on their development of any of those individual games via Google. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 09:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
See the discussion at Talk:WIIU. Cheers, Wbm1058 ( talk) 00:27, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
With the license of Arkhandar I only found a message in Talk:Naruto: Clash of Ninja (series) upon such Naruto Shippuden: Clash of Ninja Revolution 4 which will be announced in 2014 on the Wii U. 201.95.215.57 ( talk) 14:55, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Hey!
I see you have added Wii U specs, but all of that is speculative and not confirmed by Nintendo nor they have released any sort of data for it.
http://www.nintendo.com/wiiu/features/tech-specs/
So is it fair to add something thats not officially declared, considering Wikipedia is the quintessential source of information, won't it be misleading to add "rumoured" specs? -- Shashpant
Hi! I'm reverting your recent edits to the Espresso article due to lack of references. I'm sorry. I'd gladly put them back with sources though. -- Henriok ( talk) 08:39, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Please stop reverting the changes on the Wii U arcticle. The current version has a border which is unnecessary whereas the image I uploaded on the article had a transparent background. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malikdahra ( talk • contribs) 02:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
I know it was a while ago but I've been offline a while.
Sorry about the slight mix up with one of my edits - it isn't easy to edit on a small screen and my grammar isn't always quite as good as I'd like it to be. I'll leave that one how you left it, at least until I get advice on wording it better (provided someone else hasn't done it already).
Usual people in life ( talk) 17:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smash 5. Since you had some involvement with the Smash 5 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smash Bros. 5. Since you had some involvement with the Smash Bros. 5 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smash Bros. 6. Since you had some involvement with the Smash Bros. 6 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Super Smash Bros. 5. Since you had some involvement with the Super Smash Bros. 5 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Super Smash Bros. 6. Since you had some involvement with the Super Smash Bros. 6 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions for the period 2014. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions for the period 2014. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I've failed the second nomination of Nintendo 2DS due to problems with the reliability of numerous sources used in the article. Please ensure that all sources have their reliability verified and are replaced as needed before renominating the article. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 14:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Greetings,
I am new to Wikipedia and for an editing assignment which I have to do for a course at university I have picked Nintendo Zone. I was wondering if you had any tips or suggestions on what I could help edit on the page that would benefit it (such as particular areas that would needs work). If you are able to provide suggestions that I could use as a starting point for the edit that would be great. Thank you very much.
XTeaBag3 ( talk) 05:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
While I like the changes to Mario and Luigi, the others are less then satisfactory. In general, the lead image of a character should not necessarily be the most recent game they appear in. It should be the art which best displays their character. Some may say even the Mario and Luigi images aren't the best, because their jumping pose. However, as the nature of their games, and the fact Mario was once called "Jumpman" I think a jumping pose is perfectly appropriate. As for Fox McCloud, you uploaded an image from Star Fox 64 3D... Although it is technically the newest Star Fox game, that is still 64 graphics, and thus his character is very simple, and not the most exemplary for his lead image. Detail > Recency. The Smash Bros Brawl artwork is generally the most detailed character artwork for most of the characters that appear in it.(mostly because half of them haven't had decent games since then) Blake ( Talk· Edits) 16:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
For tireless (yikes) copyediting, etc. Your 'thanks' for my work on List of Wii U software led me to check your intense activity on Nintendo and inspired me to do likewise! — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 08:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC) |
Where are the sources that state Nintendo Software Planning & Development actively helped on development for some of the recent games you've added to the list? Just because a producer from SPD co-produced the game doesn't mean the entire group did, unless I'm missing something. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 13:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Nintendo Barnstar | |
For hard core creative table layout, and insanely tedious mass conversions theretofore, with a touch of Japanese. Seething masses of drowning data THANK YOU! For exploring vast castles and corporate ivory towers across the seas, erasing large swaths of fog-of-war black from our map, and discovering lost levels! For good sportsmanship and granting secret power ups to your fellow players, upon which I personally thrive. I hear Wikipedia's end boss is REALLY HARD so LET'S-A-GO! 1up 1up 1up 1up 1up — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 01:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC) |
For what reason is this here? It's just duplicate info of stuff listed above it, and half of the list wasn't made by EAD anyway. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 22:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Here is my problem with the games developed on EAD wikipedia page. It's become way too bloated with unnecessary details. The main listing should serve just what games they developed. One of the biggest errors is this insistence on adding co-developer tags (several are erroneously listed at that) which isn't necessary on this page, maybe on the specific game page. The Monolith Soft "co-developer" tags are extremely inaccurate and they are plastered all over the EAD page. Monolith Soft (kyoto) is a graphic asset team that helps EAD Kyoto finish games on a production level. This means they join the development team near the end of development, and help model some NPC/objects. That's the same thing hundreds of small companies do for every game, and we don't go listing them as co-developers. Monolith Soft (Kyoto) and 1-Up Studio list themselves are support studios, as they are listed in the credits, but to say they are co-developers in disingenuous. I mean, SRD and Mario Club are equally "co-developers" of all those Monolith Soft support games listed for EAD. See my point? Games like Steel Diver, Star Fox 64 3D, NES Remix are true examples of co-developed EAD games since they were 50/50. But several of the others, are not. NOAWiki ( talk) 03:26, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
@ Arkhandar:What sections are relevant is likely subjective. What is verifiable however is not. Everything in the previous version of the page had a link which I believe would make it verifiable. All the articles are linked and all the info is legitimate. Can you explain why this info is not relevant or "advertising"? Yanninski ( talk) 18:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Hey there, brother. Do you happen to know what was the role of intelligent systems on this section? We don't just want a bare list WP:NOTDIR. I wrote that generic lead sentence in that section just to have something as better than nothing. All I found is their Japanese page shown there, and I couldn't find any information on their development of any of those individual games via Google. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 09:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
See the discussion at Talk:WIIU. Cheers, Wbm1058 ( talk) 00:27, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
With the license of Arkhandar I only found a message in Talk:Naruto: Clash of Ninja (series) upon such Naruto Shippuden: Clash of Ninja Revolution 4 which will be announced in 2014 on the Wii U. 201.95.215.57 ( talk) 14:55, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Hey!
I see you have added Wii U specs, but all of that is speculative and not confirmed by Nintendo nor they have released any sort of data for it.
http://www.nintendo.com/wiiu/features/tech-specs/
So is it fair to add something thats not officially declared, considering Wikipedia is the quintessential source of information, won't it be misleading to add "rumoured" specs? -- Shashpant
Hi! I'm reverting your recent edits to the Espresso article due to lack of references. I'm sorry. I'd gladly put them back with sources though. -- Henriok ( talk) 08:39, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Please stop reverting the changes on the Wii U arcticle. The current version has a border which is unnecessary whereas the image I uploaded on the article had a transparent background. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malikdahra ( talk • contribs) 02:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
I know it was a while ago but I've been offline a while.
Sorry about the slight mix up with one of my edits - it isn't easy to edit on a small screen and my grammar isn't always quite as good as I'd like it to be. I'll leave that one how you left it, at least until I get advice on wording it better (provided someone else hasn't done it already).
Usual people in life ( talk) 17:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smash 5. Since you had some involvement with the Smash 5 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smash Bros. 5. Since you had some involvement with the Smash Bros. 5 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smash Bros. 6. Since you had some involvement with the Smash Bros. 6 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Super Smash Bros. 5. Since you had some involvement with the Super Smash Bros. 5 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Super Smash Bros. 6. Since you had some involvement with the Super Smash Bros. 6 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions for the period 2014. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |