Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at [2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings]. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as " edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Qasee1230 ( talk) 16:22, 21 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Please stop making racist personal attacks. 71.218.108.117 ( talk) 16:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC) reply

You keep making this change [1] but it's effectively unsourced as you are simply adding numbers for the references, and the numbers have long changed, if they ever supported the additional text. Please use reference tags correctly so the info you are adding is supported by references and can be evaluated accordingly. BTW, you (along with several other editors) are well past the WP:3RR limit so you probably should stop point blank. Also everyone is welcome to edit here whatever the ethnicity or national origin. Continue to insist people shouldn't be allowed to edit because of their ethnicity or national origin and expect to be blocked. Nil Einne ( talk) 16:42, 21 April 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Argumentdebate: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at [2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings]. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as " edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Qasee1230 ( talk) 16:42, 21 April 2019 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Drmies ( talk) 16:49, 21 April 2019 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Bbb23 ( talk) 17:52, 21 April 2019 (UTC) reply