|
I replied to your comment on my Talk Page. /info/en/?search=User_talk:VictorD7#United_States_-.3E_poor
Wherein I apparently had the outrageous impertinence to disagree with a conservative on the deletion of material concerning the "poor" in the US, "published" online by right-wing political activists of the so-called Heritage Foundation.
Wiki page: United States -> poor
"Added government sources, but next time effort to verify something before deleting." VictorD7
"If you want to purge biased sourced we can't be one sided. Plenty of leftist ones in the section and on the page we'd have to delete." VictorD7
Heritage is America's most prominent mainstream conservative think tank and this inclusion was discussed on the Talk Page a year or so ago. It's been up since then without challenge. VictorD7 (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
If you have a complaint about long standing consensus text you tag it and/or start a Talk Page section to discuss it.
If you had simply done that I could have easily answered any questions you had.
...adding them to the article wasn't needed
because we had a consensus.
Virtually every source on Wikipedia is "biased" in some way.
You can't purge conservative sources while leaving loads of leftist sources, including think tanks like CBPP, activist academics like Smeeding and Saez, and even liberal blogs.
I have my own political views as you clearly do, but I do have Wikipedia's interests in mind, which is why I'm fair and always willing to hash things out in a rational manner on the Talk Page.
Finally, it's taking enormous restraint for me to refrain from saying what your disgusting "KKK" comparison actually says about you.
Wherein a "Conservative" Reverts my comments off his Talk Page, then Flippity-Flop reposts my Comments back onto his Talk Page in Order to Educate Me about the Manifold Errors I Make, and also to Advise me that I am a "Deluded" "Hypocritical Halfwit," and a "troll," and I "get boring fast." Oct 4-7, 2013
Wherein Yet Another Conservative Once More Bases His Weak Excuse for an Argument on a Fictional Reinterpretation of Events.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Classification System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Automated Fingerprint Identification System ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:50, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Ya, it's a slang word derived from people making mistakes. Not worth disputing, if you like crappy English instead of what's proper... so be it. I ain't gonna bother fixing your lazy adaption no more.
And sign your posts when going to someone's talk page. Cebr1979 ( talk) 02:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC) Cebr1979 ( talk) 02:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
|
I replied to your comment on my Talk Page. /info/en/?search=User_talk:VictorD7#United_States_-.3E_poor
Wherein I apparently had the outrageous impertinence to disagree with a conservative on the deletion of material concerning the "poor" in the US, "published" online by right-wing political activists of the so-called Heritage Foundation.
Wiki page: United States -> poor
"Added government sources, but next time effort to verify something before deleting." VictorD7
"If you want to purge biased sourced we can't be one sided. Plenty of leftist ones in the section and on the page we'd have to delete." VictorD7
Heritage is America's most prominent mainstream conservative think tank and this inclusion was discussed on the Talk Page a year or so ago. It's been up since then without challenge. VictorD7 (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
If you have a complaint about long standing consensus text you tag it and/or start a Talk Page section to discuss it.
If you had simply done that I could have easily answered any questions you had.
...adding them to the article wasn't needed
because we had a consensus.
Virtually every source on Wikipedia is "biased" in some way.
You can't purge conservative sources while leaving loads of leftist sources, including think tanks like CBPP, activist academics like Smeeding and Saez, and even liberal blogs.
I have my own political views as you clearly do, but I do have Wikipedia's interests in mind, which is why I'm fair and always willing to hash things out in a rational manner on the Talk Page.
Finally, it's taking enormous restraint for me to refrain from saying what your disgusting "KKK" comparison actually says about you.
Wherein a "Conservative" Reverts my comments off his Talk Page, then Flippity-Flop reposts my Comments back onto his Talk Page in Order to Educate Me about the Manifold Errors I Make, and also to Advise me that I am a "Deluded" "Hypocritical Halfwit," and a "troll," and I "get boring fast." Oct 4-7, 2013
Wherein Yet Another Conservative Once More Bases His Weak Excuse for an Argument on a Fictional Reinterpretation of Events.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Classification System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Automated Fingerprint Identification System ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:50, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Ya, it's a slang word derived from people making mistakes. Not worth disputing, if you like crappy English instead of what's proper... so be it. I ain't gonna bother fixing your lazy adaption no more.
And sign your posts when going to someone's talk page. Cebr1979 ( talk) 02:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC) Cebr1979 ( talk) 02:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)