That's ok.. compromise is better than edit wars i think. --- Paulley ( talk) 16:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Stop it. The section says NOTHING. Quesada made a joke. The section says 'quesada made a joke, it was shown to be a joke. We know nothing, and we're writing that only the writers know here on wikipedia.' It's a useless, uninformative section, and does not need to be included.
ThuranX (
talk)
14:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
No, you stop it. This has been a mainstay for months and now it must go because you decree it to be so? And when asked to discuss you delete instead of replying on your own talk page. You keep coming up with reasons that do NOT justify the section's removal. The section alleviates rumors about identity and clarifies to the READER (not the editors) that this is not the case and the identity is unknown. It stays. -- Apoklyptk ( talk) 14:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
REd Hulk. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. Stop now! Further edit warring at this article without first obtaining consensus on the talk page will result in a block
Spartaz
Humbug!
21:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm starting a new discussion on the Red Hulk page about the Quesada quote, please take your comments there. I understand you and ThuranX have had difficulties in the past, but let's all be civil in the new discussion and we can work things out. Thanks! Dayewalker ( talk) 21:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I've started a consensus discussion on the edit conflict on Red Hulk here. Can you offer your opinion on the four points there? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 15:25, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Can you join this discussion in order to offer us your thoughts? We need as many people as we can get in this, since the 4-6 participants from previous discussions on this matter was felt by some to be insufficient. It would be most appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 07:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
That's ok.. compromise is better than edit wars i think. --- Paulley ( talk) 16:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Stop it. The section says NOTHING. Quesada made a joke. The section says 'quesada made a joke, it was shown to be a joke. We know nothing, and we're writing that only the writers know here on wikipedia.' It's a useless, uninformative section, and does not need to be included.
ThuranX (
talk)
14:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
No, you stop it. This has been a mainstay for months and now it must go because you decree it to be so? And when asked to discuss you delete instead of replying on your own talk page. You keep coming up with reasons that do NOT justify the section's removal. The section alleviates rumors about identity and clarifies to the READER (not the editors) that this is not the case and the identity is unknown. It stays. -- Apoklyptk ( talk) 14:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
REd Hulk. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. Stop now! Further edit warring at this article without first obtaining consensus on the talk page will result in a block
Spartaz
Humbug!
21:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm starting a new discussion on the Red Hulk page about the Quesada quote, please take your comments there. I understand you and ThuranX have had difficulties in the past, but let's all be civil in the new discussion and we can work things out. Thanks! Dayewalker ( talk) 21:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I've started a consensus discussion on the edit conflict on Red Hulk here. Can you offer your opinion on the four points there? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 15:25, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Can you join this discussion in order to offer us your thoughts? We need as many people as we can get in this, since the 4-6 participants from previous discussions on this matter was felt by some to be insufficient. It would be most appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 07:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)