Always make sure that the content you upload, primarily those from movie related sites are distributable under the documents quoted by you, anyway thanks
Tux the penguin 14:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions
Your userpage is neat. Can you help me remove the white spaces from my userpage. My userboxes are not aligned and I have absolutely no clue as to what to do about them. Anwar saadat 23:33, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
On the Ajith talk page, Prin has said that he doesn't mind if the external links are incorporated into the template he insists on using. I would suggest the following format:
'Prema Lekha (Telugu) songs (1996) | [Insert Role Here] |
Don't you think the user(s) on the other side of the conlict would accept this compromise? -- Tantalum T e lluride 21:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you made a reversion on Tamil Nadu, changing the links from the usual interlanguage links (which usually appear in the lefthand side, below the toolbox) to a list of normal links. Wikipedia:Interlanguage links probably explains it better, but the correct way to make links to the same article in another language is [[da:Tamil Nadu]], not [[:da:Tamil Nadu]]. Happy editing! Rasmus (talk) 18:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Anwar,
I always liked your work and the stubborn attitude you showed on Ajith's article. But when I saw your edits on Vijay (actor)'s article, really i was disappointed. You might not be a great fan of him, but why do you add those debut with a "Flop film", Aathi's red card issue describing very harshly.
As you edit more on Ajith, When it comes to Ajith's flop film it is a musical hit and never mention the film flopped badly. But in the case of Vijay, the film is a flop and big slump in his career, why this partiality? If you edit in a such a way for Vijay, do the same with Ajith describe all his flop films and the continuosly flops he gave. Be neutral on dumping ...
We must be neutral when we present an article at wikipedia. I wish and request you to improve Vijay's article as Ajith's. Keep doing your good work. -- M.arunprasad 05:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
I have been informed by several others about the Ajith article you and som other user were the ones to blame. Stop reverting cos it will eventually break the 3 revert rule. I understand Ajith being a guest in Rajavin Parvailey but how is he a guest in Kandukondain Kandukondain. Its like saying Madhavan, Siddharth were guests in Ayutha Ezhuthu. Please use ur common sense! Dissapointingly R.Madhavan 17:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
ajith's interview.Hey;you had said that fans know thw box-office results better than tabloid.But I think the hero knows it much better than "fans" themselves.See; Ajith himself has proclaimed Nesam;ullasam and other 1997 releases of his as flops.Atleast now;please let me correct the excesses in Ajith's article.Being an admirer of Ajith;I feel fancruft in his article might only give a wrong public opinion of Ajith and his really sincere fans! S.GaneshKumar 14:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
(To Anwar saadat) This is a joke. It's not vandalism. It's a content dispute. ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 02:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
The check has been done, and the sockpuppets blocked. Jayjg (talk) 05:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Deena.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I got rid of your sd tag for this one because "questionable notability" is not reason for being speedily deleted, please review wikipedia guidelines. I added a stub, wikify, cleanup, and references tag to the article--let's expand, not delete. Stanley011 04:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Your edits to the Economy of India are good and I would like to involve more with the related sub-articles. But there are a few things, I would like to add. Please cite sources, especially for statistics and format it using {{ inote}}. See the formatting of the other references. Also, the article is written in summary style to give a larger picture. So, some of the additions that you have made will be better suited in sub-articles. I hope, you are fine with this. Thanks, -- Pamri • Talk 01:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, can you please format your references using {{ inote}}, since it will be consistent with the whole article. In this edit of yours, the inote template is used on the left hand side. In this case, add the URL to references & insert {{inote|pagetitle|1}} besides the text. -- Pamri • Talk 00:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi Anwar...I've created taluk level maps for about 80% of all districts in Karnataka (along the lines of the Bagalkot district map). I'm in the process of revitalizing content on Karnataka districts and will no doubt get to all districts eventually. At the end of this process, I hope to have all districts looking in much the same way as Bagalkot does now. Thanks AreJay 13:48, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
If you have any concerns with the behaviour of user Zora, you should go to an ArbCom case here; the committee will hear your voice. Thank you Zmmz 23:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Anwar, you say that it's OK to use words like "super-star" and "mega-hit" because those have accepted meanings in Kollywood fandom. If they have any real meaning (other than "I like this actor" and "I liked this movie") then it must have to do with box office grosses. If you were to give the box office grosses for various movies, that would be fine. We could argue about the reliability of the figures, but at least there would be something there, measurable, discussable. But just saying that Ajith is a superstar and everyone knows what that means, so go away -- that doesn't work for an article meant to be read by millions of people who have never watched an Ajith movie, or who don't know anything about Kollywood, but who might just become fans if the article catches their eye ... and their one-minute attention span. "Super-star" is unverifiable; a box-office gross isn't. I think that we can say "popular" or "well-known" without asking for figures -- those are fairly bland claims. But we just aren't using superstar in the Indian cinema articles. Even for Shah Rukh or Aamir. It's just too subjective.
There are many other problems with your versions of the Ajith and Vijay articles. There are lots of personal judgements; there is lots of hyperbole. That's not OK. We have to write the article so that someone who absolutely HATES Ajith would read it and say, "Well, it's accurate enough." Please try to look at it from that vantage point, and write for the hater, not the fan. Zora 03:15, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey Anwar, you can't vote on that Arbcom page. That's only for the decisions of the arbitrators. Better revert yourself before those guys get angry at you. :-) Lukas (T.| @) 16:10, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Anwar, please stop your accusations. Zora has neither been vandalizing, nor revert-warring, nor making changes without discussion. If you disagree with her edits, discuss it civilly. Your actions yesterday on the Arbcom case were already borderline harassment, now please take it easy and be fair. Read Wikipedia:Vandalism#What vandalism is not, for a start. Lukas (T.| @) 17:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Excuse me--I beg to differ that someone stating their grievances in an ArbCom constitutes harassment. In fact, I would say your subtle threats to a newbie are against etiquette. Instead, you should provide Mr. saadat with links in Wiki that could help him out in learning the ropes. Anwar saadat please go to the Help desk to have your questions answered--and of course, always stay civil when dealing with others. Good luck Zmmz 19:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
I removed the salary altogether. The template shows the title as annual salary. If you have that, you can add that, but please provide a reference. 'Thala' could be used with many heroes. I removed it to keep the article neutral. I left the 'Ultimate star' since he is known by that name. Hope that clarifies. - Ganeshk ( talk) 00:25, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello User: Anwar saadat,
I realise that Holy Ganga's addition of the BBC article was a controversial move considering there are differing opinions on the validity of the index. However, it is important to include this kind of information but with the modifications I made originally -> [4] which includes a link directly to the index plus a BBC article from the following day which shows the Pakistani government reaction. If an edit of this nature is made by another editor, please discuss the matter first on the talkpage and defintely avoid edit wars. Green Giant 22:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Anwar, I believe that your edit summary to Hindutva and Pakistan upon reverting Nobleeagle and Dwaipayanc respectively were inappropriate, as in the first case, it is a POV dispute, not a denigratory/nonsense edit, and in the second, you removed a reference to a statistical study which you did not agree with. Please revert and discuss, rather than to label edits you disagree with as vandalism. This applies to your comments to Zora and Ganeshk also. ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 03:23, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
The information is not from the back of the user's head, it is from the very source cited: CIA World Factbook. El_C 07:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi again. Wikipedia:Civility knows no bounds of language, so please ensure that you adhere to this policy. Also, the use of such excalmative terms or notations such as "mega-star" "!" and "mega-hit," are not considered encyclopedic but are rather viewed as hagiographical. El_C 08:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I've noticed that you have been getting into conflicts with many established editors here. Please be civil, avoid name calling and cite sources. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort and we need to work as a team and sort our differences out on the Talk pages. Please note that repeated trolling might get you blocked in the near future. Looking forward to some amicable settlements of disputes by you. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Not all of his images appear to be tagged incorrectly, but some of them definatly are. I've warned him about it, but you probably know more about the images than I would, so the best thing to be done is if you could carefully go through them, correcting the tags where applicable, and adding the 'no licence' tag only where it's not what it's tagged as (and there's no obvious tag to replace it with). If he continues reverting you, let me know. -- InShaneee 15:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello. The rule states that you can have three reverts. Deepujoseph has had three and then stopped, so he has no grounds to be banned. ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 00:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
அன்வர், நீங்கள் இங்கு புதிதாகப் பங்களிக்கத் துவங்கியுள்ளீர்கள். பெரிய மற்றும் சிக்கலான மாற்றங்களைத் தயவு செய்து பொறுமையாக பேச்சுப் பக்கங்களில் விவாதித்தபின் செய்யவும். மற்ற பயனர்களிடம் கடுமையாக நடந்து கொள்ளுதல் இங்கு ஏற்கப்படுவதில்லை. இது ஒரு விவாத மேடை இல்லை, கலைக்களஞ்சியம் என்பதை நினைவில் கொள்ளவும். அடிப்படைக் கொள்கைகளை ஒருமுறை படிக்கவும். ஏதேனும் உதவி தேவையெனில் கேளுங்கள். -- Sundar \ talk \ contribs 08:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Always make sure that the content you upload, primarily those from movie related sites are distributable under the documents quoted by you, anyway thanks
Tux the penguin 14:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions
Your userpage is neat. Can you help me remove the white spaces from my userpage. My userboxes are not aligned and I have absolutely no clue as to what to do about them. Anwar saadat 23:33, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
On the Ajith talk page, Prin has said that he doesn't mind if the external links are incorporated into the template he insists on using. I would suggest the following format:
'Prema Lekha (Telugu) songs (1996) | [Insert Role Here] |
Don't you think the user(s) on the other side of the conlict would accept this compromise? -- Tantalum T e lluride 21:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you made a reversion on Tamil Nadu, changing the links from the usual interlanguage links (which usually appear in the lefthand side, below the toolbox) to a list of normal links. Wikipedia:Interlanguage links probably explains it better, but the correct way to make links to the same article in another language is [[da:Tamil Nadu]], not [[:da:Tamil Nadu]]. Happy editing! Rasmus (talk) 18:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Anwar,
I always liked your work and the stubborn attitude you showed on Ajith's article. But when I saw your edits on Vijay (actor)'s article, really i was disappointed. You might not be a great fan of him, but why do you add those debut with a "Flop film", Aathi's red card issue describing very harshly.
As you edit more on Ajith, When it comes to Ajith's flop film it is a musical hit and never mention the film flopped badly. But in the case of Vijay, the film is a flop and big slump in his career, why this partiality? If you edit in a such a way for Vijay, do the same with Ajith describe all his flop films and the continuosly flops he gave. Be neutral on dumping ...
We must be neutral when we present an article at wikipedia. I wish and request you to improve Vijay's article as Ajith's. Keep doing your good work. -- M.arunprasad 05:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
I have been informed by several others about the Ajith article you and som other user were the ones to blame. Stop reverting cos it will eventually break the 3 revert rule. I understand Ajith being a guest in Rajavin Parvailey but how is he a guest in Kandukondain Kandukondain. Its like saying Madhavan, Siddharth were guests in Ayutha Ezhuthu. Please use ur common sense! Dissapointingly R.Madhavan 17:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
ajith's interview.Hey;you had said that fans know thw box-office results better than tabloid.But I think the hero knows it much better than "fans" themselves.See; Ajith himself has proclaimed Nesam;ullasam and other 1997 releases of his as flops.Atleast now;please let me correct the excesses in Ajith's article.Being an admirer of Ajith;I feel fancruft in his article might only give a wrong public opinion of Ajith and his really sincere fans! S.GaneshKumar 14:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
(To Anwar saadat) This is a joke. It's not vandalism. It's a content dispute. ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 02:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
The check has been done, and the sockpuppets blocked. Jayjg (talk) 05:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Deena.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I got rid of your sd tag for this one because "questionable notability" is not reason for being speedily deleted, please review wikipedia guidelines. I added a stub, wikify, cleanup, and references tag to the article--let's expand, not delete. Stanley011 04:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Your edits to the Economy of India are good and I would like to involve more with the related sub-articles. But there are a few things, I would like to add. Please cite sources, especially for statistics and format it using {{ inote}}. See the formatting of the other references. Also, the article is written in summary style to give a larger picture. So, some of the additions that you have made will be better suited in sub-articles. I hope, you are fine with this. Thanks, -- Pamri • Talk 01:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, can you please format your references using {{ inote}}, since it will be consistent with the whole article. In this edit of yours, the inote template is used on the left hand side. In this case, add the URL to references & insert {{inote|pagetitle|1}} besides the text. -- Pamri • Talk 00:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi Anwar...I've created taluk level maps for about 80% of all districts in Karnataka (along the lines of the Bagalkot district map). I'm in the process of revitalizing content on Karnataka districts and will no doubt get to all districts eventually. At the end of this process, I hope to have all districts looking in much the same way as Bagalkot does now. Thanks AreJay 13:48, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
If you have any concerns with the behaviour of user Zora, you should go to an ArbCom case here; the committee will hear your voice. Thank you Zmmz 23:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Anwar, you say that it's OK to use words like "super-star" and "mega-hit" because those have accepted meanings in Kollywood fandom. If they have any real meaning (other than "I like this actor" and "I liked this movie") then it must have to do with box office grosses. If you were to give the box office grosses for various movies, that would be fine. We could argue about the reliability of the figures, but at least there would be something there, measurable, discussable. But just saying that Ajith is a superstar and everyone knows what that means, so go away -- that doesn't work for an article meant to be read by millions of people who have never watched an Ajith movie, or who don't know anything about Kollywood, but who might just become fans if the article catches their eye ... and their one-minute attention span. "Super-star" is unverifiable; a box-office gross isn't. I think that we can say "popular" or "well-known" without asking for figures -- those are fairly bland claims. But we just aren't using superstar in the Indian cinema articles. Even for Shah Rukh or Aamir. It's just too subjective.
There are many other problems with your versions of the Ajith and Vijay articles. There are lots of personal judgements; there is lots of hyperbole. That's not OK. We have to write the article so that someone who absolutely HATES Ajith would read it and say, "Well, it's accurate enough." Please try to look at it from that vantage point, and write for the hater, not the fan. Zora 03:15, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey Anwar, you can't vote on that Arbcom page. That's only for the decisions of the arbitrators. Better revert yourself before those guys get angry at you. :-) Lukas (T.| @) 16:10, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Anwar, please stop your accusations. Zora has neither been vandalizing, nor revert-warring, nor making changes without discussion. If you disagree with her edits, discuss it civilly. Your actions yesterday on the Arbcom case were already borderline harassment, now please take it easy and be fair. Read Wikipedia:Vandalism#What vandalism is not, for a start. Lukas (T.| @) 17:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Excuse me--I beg to differ that someone stating their grievances in an ArbCom constitutes harassment. In fact, I would say your subtle threats to a newbie are against etiquette. Instead, you should provide Mr. saadat with links in Wiki that could help him out in learning the ropes. Anwar saadat please go to the Help desk to have your questions answered--and of course, always stay civil when dealing with others. Good luck Zmmz 19:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
I removed the salary altogether. The template shows the title as annual salary. If you have that, you can add that, but please provide a reference. 'Thala' could be used with many heroes. I removed it to keep the article neutral. I left the 'Ultimate star' since he is known by that name. Hope that clarifies. - Ganeshk ( talk) 00:25, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello User: Anwar saadat,
I realise that Holy Ganga's addition of the BBC article was a controversial move considering there are differing opinions on the validity of the index. However, it is important to include this kind of information but with the modifications I made originally -> [4] which includes a link directly to the index plus a BBC article from the following day which shows the Pakistani government reaction. If an edit of this nature is made by another editor, please discuss the matter first on the talkpage and defintely avoid edit wars. Green Giant 22:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Anwar, I believe that your edit summary to Hindutva and Pakistan upon reverting Nobleeagle and Dwaipayanc respectively were inappropriate, as in the first case, it is a POV dispute, not a denigratory/nonsense edit, and in the second, you removed a reference to a statistical study which you did not agree with. Please revert and discuss, rather than to label edits you disagree with as vandalism. This applies to your comments to Zora and Ganeshk also. ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 03:23, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
The information is not from the back of the user's head, it is from the very source cited: CIA World Factbook. El_C 07:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi again. Wikipedia:Civility knows no bounds of language, so please ensure that you adhere to this policy. Also, the use of such excalmative terms or notations such as "mega-star" "!" and "mega-hit," are not considered encyclopedic but are rather viewed as hagiographical. El_C 08:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I've noticed that you have been getting into conflicts with many established editors here. Please be civil, avoid name calling and cite sources. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort and we need to work as a team and sort our differences out on the Talk pages. Please note that repeated trolling might get you blocked in the near future. Looking forward to some amicable settlements of disputes by you. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Not all of his images appear to be tagged incorrectly, but some of them definatly are. I've warned him about it, but you probably know more about the images than I would, so the best thing to be done is if you could carefully go through them, correcting the tags where applicable, and adding the 'no licence' tag only where it's not what it's tagged as (and there's no obvious tag to replace it with). If he continues reverting you, let me know. -- InShaneee 15:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello. The rule states that you can have three reverts. Deepujoseph has had three and then stopped, so he has no grounds to be banned. ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 00:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
அன்வர், நீங்கள் இங்கு புதிதாகப் பங்களிக்கத் துவங்கியுள்ளீர்கள். பெரிய மற்றும் சிக்கலான மாற்றங்களைத் தயவு செய்து பொறுமையாக பேச்சுப் பக்கங்களில் விவாதித்தபின் செய்யவும். மற்ற பயனர்களிடம் கடுமையாக நடந்து கொள்ளுதல் இங்கு ஏற்கப்படுவதில்லை. இது ஒரு விவாத மேடை இல்லை, கலைக்களஞ்சியம் என்பதை நினைவில் கொள்ளவும். அடிப்படைக் கொள்கைகளை ஒருமுறை படிக்கவும். ஏதேனும் உதவி தேவையெனில் கேளுங்கள். -- Sundar \ talk \ contribs 08:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)