Hi! As far as I can see, the section you're removing from Weil, Gotshal & Manges is confirmed by reliable sources? If that's not the case, you can explain your reasons at Talk:Weil, Gotshal & Manges, and get consensus from other users that the best version of this article wouldn't include that section. However, you'll need to stop leaving personal attacks against User:Knowsetfree, since that does not accomplish anything except a possible block for yourself. Thanks! - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 16:09, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://mta.hu/data/EASAC_Homepathy_statement_web_final_2.pdf. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 19:49, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Dianna, Welcome to Wikipedia. You may consider learning about fair use: "Around 10% of Wikipedia pages in English have some form of fair use content—that’s over 500,000 articles quoting from a book or an article;" Says the GC of Wikemedia Foundaiton anyway. Stephen LaPorte, Senior Legal Counsel, Wikimedia Foundation [1]
You have recently made edits related to
pseudoscience and
fringe science. This is a standard message to inform you that
pseudoscience and
fringe science is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see
WP:CTVSDS.
Hipal (
talk) 19:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and may lead to a
block or
ban.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Hipal ( talk) 22:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi! As far as I can see, the section you're removing from Weil, Gotshal & Manges is confirmed by reliable sources? If that's not the case, you can explain your reasons at Talk:Weil, Gotshal & Manges, and get consensus from other users that the best version of this article wouldn't include that section. However, you'll need to stop leaving personal attacks against User:Knowsetfree, since that does not accomplish anything except a possible block for yourself. Thanks! - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 16:09, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://mta.hu/data/EASAC_Homepathy_statement_web_final_2.pdf. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 19:49, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Dianna, Welcome to Wikipedia. You may consider learning about fair use: "Around 10% of Wikipedia pages in English have some form of fair use content—that’s over 500,000 articles quoting from a book or an article;" Says the GC of Wikemedia Foundaiton anyway. Stephen LaPorte, Senior Legal Counsel, Wikimedia Foundation [1]
You have recently made edits related to
pseudoscience and
fringe science. This is a standard message to inform you that
pseudoscience and
fringe science is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see
WP:CTVSDS.
Hipal (
talk) 19:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and may lead to a
block or
ban.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Hipal ( talk) 22:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC)