According to the Jesus page & Messiah page, Muslims do consider Jesus the Messiah. I did not add any new information to the page, I just moved things around. Plumber ( talk) 13:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Antique Rose. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing
Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing
Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.
You are encouraged to change
<font color="#0000FF">Antique</font> <font color="#FF007F">Rose</font> — <font color="red">[[User talk:Antique Rose|Drop me a line]]</font>
: Antique Rose —
Drop me a lineto
<span style="color: #0000FF">Antique</span> <span style="color: #FF007F;">Rose</span> — [[User talk:Antique Rose|<span style="color: red;">Drop me a line</span>]]
: Antique Rose —
Drop me a line— Anomalocaris ( talk) 09:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
#top
, like this:<span style="color: #0000FF">Antique</span> <span style="color: #FF007F;">Rose</span> — [[User talk:Antique Rose#top|<span style="color: red;">Drop me a line</span>]]
: Antique Rose —
Drop me a linefyi, your signature currently doesn't link to your user or talk page, and I wish it did :) - if you need technical help with that, happy to offer whatever assistance I can (not that I necessarily can fix it, but I am a web developer) II | ( t - c) 08:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Antique Rose. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Antique Rose. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I noted today your edit to the infobox where you changed the date of the apprehension of Jodi Arias from July 15 to June 15.
The article says "On July 9, 2008, Arias was indicted by a grand jury in Maricopa County, Arizona for the first-degree murder of Alexander. She was arrested at her home on July 15 and extradited to Arizona on September 5."
Was Arias apprehended a couple of weeks before the July 9 indictment? Did she attend the indictment hearing? If she did, then she must have been released on bail and moved interstate (then extradited). Please don't regard these as dopey questions, because people unfamiliar with US legal systems are often bemused by goings on in them. Whatever, a July 15 date would seem justified in the infobox. Moriori ( talk) 23:10, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Antique Rose. Regarding your removal of a link to the Insight episode, I thought I'd discuss before reverting your edit. The video is uploaded on YouTube by the copyright holder, so there's no violation of WP:YOUTUBE. It doesn't appear to be spam. I think it's informative and relevant, especially when compared to some other external links in the article. But you may have a reason I haven't considered. Thanks in advance for a reply. Sundayclose ( talk) 21:25, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, thank you for intervening. This particular IP has been doing this consistently since 2019. I just figured I'd give you a heads up about it. Dibol ( talk) 17:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Antique Rose, per WP:BURDEN, please take a moment to add a reliable inline citation to the disputed entry at Sylvester Stallone filmography. Thank you very much in advance. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 19:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Can you please explain what you find unsatisfactory about actually providing the exact quote from the movie Roger Rabbit that involves Huey, Louie and Dewey? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:2121:28f:693c:30c8:d572:fe8a:c254 ( talk • contribs)
Hi - your signature does not contain a link to your user page/talk page, as required by policy. Please add a link at your earliest convenience ~ TheresNoTime ( to explain!) 18:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Antique Rose, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to ask you to please not leave sock tags and block notices on user talk pages, as you did here, since there are often good reasons for accounts to be left untagged, and leaving block notices on behalf of others strikes me as misleading. I have reverted the edits in question. Best, -- Blablubbs ( talk) 21:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Thinking about doing a GAN for Audrey Hepburn. Any interest is doing a co-nomination for GAN for this biography page? ErnestKrause ( talk) 16:31, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello - you reverted my addition of 2 more paragraphs in this lead. I just want to note that for several years, until September 20, the paragraphing was in the form that I restored it to. I don't know why someone changed it on Sept. 24 or so. If you look at the leads of numerous other top-level films stars (Cary Grant, James Stewart, Bogart, Gable, Kathryn Hepburn, Beete Davis, Ingrid Bergman) you will see paragaphing similar to what was there before Sept. 20 - usually 5 paragraphs. The paragraphing you have restored it to clearly has excessive length and merging of topics that made sense as separate paragraphs. Anyhow, maybe you will consider my thoughts. The article did have the 5 paragraphing format for several years. I think my point about the repetitious text is valid as well - compare to all the other leads I mentioned. 77.66.118.199 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.118.199 ( talk) 23:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC) Kirk Douglas, Burt Lancaster, Henry Fonda, Paul Newman, Brando,
Hello. Please, do not take any of my edits personal, I am just trying to contribute, and I like stylizing articles. Can you explain why you reverted me on Pope Francis? I didn't find anything in the MOS about *not* capitalizing the first letter of templates (I'm not being ironic, btw). Thanks. 7szz ( talk) 01:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lingerie. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 22:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you are a member of the Fashion WikiProject, so I was wondering if you might be willing to take a look at some suggestions I made to update the Daphne Guinness page, which is really out of date. I’m not able to propose these changes directly since I have a personal connection to the subject, which I’m given to understand means I have a COI. Thanks in advance. YhSA99b3tTnCnLdr ( talk) 19:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Good evening Antique Rose. Please revert your reversion on the Wannsee Conference article regarding the English translation of the German Sonderfahndungsbuch Polen, given the new consensus on the Talk page. If you still disagree, please join the discussion on the Talk page and add your own thoughts on the best translation. 109.146.228.173 ( talk) 17:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi there! I saw you were active in the Fashion wikiproject and was wondering if you could take a look at a draft I've written about the designer Draft:Sandy Liang. I was very surprised to find that she did not have an article because of her notability and wide coverage in various publications. As a novice contributor I would love your feedback and review. Thanks! Luiysia ( talk) 20:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I’m reaching out because you’re a member of WP:FASHION and I’m looking for feedback on suggestions to Talk:Modern Meadow#Proposal for changes to this article. These changes were proposed by User: Ahashake111, who is a colleague of mine at Modern Meadow but I am taking over for them now to follow through on the suggested updates they originally posted. Would you be willing to check out my ideas for changes? Thanks! Puri20 ( talk) 18:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
According to the Jesus page & Messiah page, Muslims do consider Jesus the Messiah. I did not add any new information to the page, I just moved things around. Plumber ( talk) 13:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Antique Rose. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing
Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing
Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.
You are encouraged to change
<font color="#0000FF">Antique</font> <font color="#FF007F">Rose</font> — <font color="red">[[User talk:Antique Rose|Drop me a line]]</font>
: Antique Rose —
Drop me a lineto
<span style="color: #0000FF">Antique</span> <span style="color: #FF007F;">Rose</span> — [[User talk:Antique Rose|<span style="color: red;">Drop me a line</span>]]
: Antique Rose —
Drop me a line— Anomalocaris ( talk) 09:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
#top
, like this:<span style="color: #0000FF">Antique</span> <span style="color: #FF007F;">Rose</span> — [[User talk:Antique Rose#top|<span style="color: red;">Drop me a line</span>]]
: Antique Rose —
Drop me a linefyi, your signature currently doesn't link to your user or talk page, and I wish it did :) - if you need technical help with that, happy to offer whatever assistance I can (not that I necessarily can fix it, but I am a web developer) II | ( t - c) 08:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Antique Rose. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Antique Rose. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I noted today your edit to the infobox where you changed the date of the apprehension of Jodi Arias from July 15 to June 15.
The article says "On July 9, 2008, Arias was indicted by a grand jury in Maricopa County, Arizona for the first-degree murder of Alexander. She was arrested at her home on July 15 and extradited to Arizona on September 5."
Was Arias apprehended a couple of weeks before the July 9 indictment? Did she attend the indictment hearing? If she did, then she must have been released on bail and moved interstate (then extradited). Please don't regard these as dopey questions, because people unfamiliar with US legal systems are often bemused by goings on in them. Whatever, a July 15 date would seem justified in the infobox. Moriori ( talk) 23:10, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Antique Rose. Regarding your removal of a link to the Insight episode, I thought I'd discuss before reverting your edit. The video is uploaded on YouTube by the copyright holder, so there's no violation of WP:YOUTUBE. It doesn't appear to be spam. I think it's informative and relevant, especially when compared to some other external links in the article. But you may have a reason I haven't considered. Thanks in advance for a reply. Sundayclose ( talk) 21:25, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, thank you for intervening. This particular IP has been doing this consistently since 2019. I just figured I'd give you a heads up about it. Dibol ( talk) 17:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Antique Rose, per WP:BURDEN, please take a moment to add a reliable inline citation to the disputed entry at Sylvester Stallone filmography. Thank you very much in advance. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 19:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Can you please explain what you find unsatisfactory about actually providing the exact quote from the movie Roger Rabbit that involves Huey, Louie and Dewey? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:2121:28f:693c:30c8:d572:fe8a:c254 ( talk • contribs)
Hi - your signature does not contain a link to your user page/talk page, as required by policy. Please add a link at your earliest convenience ~ TheresNoTime ( to explain!) 18:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Antique Rose, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to ask you to please not leave sock tags and block notices on user talk pages, as you did here, since there are often good reasons for accounts to be left untagged, and leaving block notices on behalf of others strikes me as misleading. I have reverted the edits in question. Best, -- Blablubbs ( talk) 21:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Thinking about doing a GAN for Audrey Hepburn. Any interest is doing a co-nomination for GAN for this biography page? ErnestKrause ( talk) 16:31, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello - you reverted my addition of 2 more paragraphs in this lead. I just want to note that for several years, until September 20, the paragraphing was in the form that I restored it to. I don't know why someone changed it on Sept. 24 or so. If you look at the leads of numerous other top-level films stars (Cary Grant, James Stewart, Bogart, Gable, Kathryn Hepburn, Beete Davis, Ingrid Bergman) you will see paragaphing similar to what was there before Sept. 20 - usually 5 paragraphs. The paragraphing you have restored it to clearly has excessive length and merging of topics that made sense as separate paragraphs. Anyhow, maybe you will consider my thoughts. The article did have the 5 paragraphing format for several years. I think my point about the repetitious text is valid as well - compare to all the other leads I mentioned. 77.66.118.199 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.118.199 ( talk) 23:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC) Kirk Douglas, Burt Lancaster, Henry Fonda, Paul Newman, Brando,
Hello. Please, do not take any of my edits personal, I am just trying to contribute, and I like stylizing articles. Can you explain why you reverted me on Pope Francis? I didn't find anything in the MOS about *not* capitalizing the first letter of templates (I'm not being ironic, btw). Thanks. 7szz ( talk) 01:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lingerie. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 22:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you are a member of the Fashion WikiProject, so I was wondering if you might be willing to take a look at some suggestions I made to update the Daphne Guinness page, which is really out of date. I’m not able to propose these changes directly since I have a personal connection to the subject, which I’m given to understand means I have a COI. Thanks in advance. YhSA99b3tTnCnLdr ( talk) 19:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Good evening Antique Rose. Please revert your reversion on the Wannsee Conference article regarding the English translation of the German Sonderfahndungsbuch Polen, given the new consensus on the Talk page. If you still disagree, please join the discussion on the Talk page and add your own thoughts on the best translation. 109.146.228.173 ( talk) 17:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi there! I saw you were active in the Fashion wikiproject and was wondering if you could take a look at a draft I've written about the designer Draft:Sandy Liang. I was very surprised to find that she did not have an article because of her notability and wide coverage in various publications. As a novice contributor I would love your feedback and review. Thanks! Luiysia ( talk) 20:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I’m reaching out because you’re a member of WP:FASHION and I’m looking for feedback on suggestions to Talk:Modern Meadow#Proposal for changes to this article. These changes were proposed by User: Ahashake111, who is a colleague of mine at Modern Meadow but I am taking over for them now to follow through on the suggested updates they originally posted. Would you be willing to check out my ideas for changes? Thanks! Puri20 ( talk) 18:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)