![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Ansell, thankyou for your welcome message. The links on the template were helpful and I have enjoyed making edits. Also thanks for your invite to join the Adventist WikiProject, which I have done. Cheers, Colin MacLaurin 10:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC).
I don't think it's a stretch or in any way to controversial to call the character Napoleon Dynamite a compuslive liar. Here's one of many reviews of the film that describe the character using the term. [1]. I reverted your revert of my edit, but I am certainly willing to discuss the issue further with you.-- The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 11:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
|
|
|
Your entire signature appears to link to your Esperanza subpage. Is that intentional? The text of that page suggests that you just meant to link the "e". Zetawoof( ζ) 02:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ansell. Have you ever thought of this? User:Blnguyen/RfA. Regards, Blnguyen | rant-line 07:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I deliberately kept the text of the performer's name out of the visible text; it wasn't a mixtake on my part. Is this proper, or do you think the current version is better? - Richardcavell 00:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
My edit summary was based on a misreading; I stand by the revert, though. The point (that Wikipedia has minimal notability standards) stands, though.
I would be open to other suggestions for wording and linkage, though. Thanks, Luc "Somethingorother" French 01:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
C'mon, man. Did you even read the article? The alleged "Lord" is the child of Anastasia Romanov (see link). His uncle VanLoone produces zero Ghits, and his uncle's ship the HMS Puma was scrapped in 1976. The article is a mishmash of Horatio Nelson and Aberdeen. This isn't just a hoax, this is patent nonsense. VoiceOfReason 04:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. The page now has sources at the bottom. --Kiran90 10:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC) (PS. Stop saying G'Day!! hehehe)
Wait, sorry, i think i got a bit of info mixed up. I'll verify it and put it back in. And yeh, fair enough about the g;day thing, i just never say it :S and yes, i am aussie. Brissie Aussie. --Kiran90 10:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
K, its all done, but im a bit iffy about how to reference them. Can you give me a few pointers? --Kiran90 10:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
No worries. I'd guess you opened just after I'd made the edit - these things happen sometimes! JPD ( talk) 11:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
That article is so crazy right now that it's confusing even for admins like me. Since his death, that article has seen 600 edits. "Insane" is a mild term for it. And as dawn hits in the US, it's going to get worse. -- Woohookitty (meow) 11:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, in response to the message that you sent me about my editing of the article on "Stingray", I was merely removing uncouth sentences like "The number of Steve Irwins has tripled" and "I suck mt bum" which was added by a troublemaker. This was not an experiment, and I hope you could enlighten me on your comment, as I am unable to fathom whether yours was supposed to be positive or negative. Thank you.
You keep beating me to reverts! Viridae Talk 02:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about losing your the comment in the shuffle! I was about to reinsert it, but you beat me to it. :-) —
David Levy
05:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
I reverted your edit because it did not happen on 6 September, and I felt the previous version of the article was sufficient. -- Zimbabweed 06:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Although I support the removal of unreferenced material - WP:LIVING doesn't apply... [2]. 09:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Viridae ( talk • contribs) .
Doh! How is it possible to edit an article ten times, to have him all over the press, radio, and TV, and still get his name wrong? Ta for the edit. Mr Stephen 12:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
You commented on a user page with the wrong link, keeping regionalisms for regional pages is referenced here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English not the generic wp:spelling page. Just for future reference (they probably moved it since last time, knowing how crappy the style and rule pages are set up). Zotel - the Stub Maker 13:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, Ansell, for your support and comments at my RfA, which finished with a tally of 94/1/0. I hope I live up to the confidence you have shown in me in my activities as an administrator. JPD ( talk) 16:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Ansell, thankyou for your welcome message. The links on the template were helpful and I have enjoyed making edits. Also thanks for your invite to join the Adventist WikiProject, which I have done. Cheers, Colin MacLaurin 10:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC).
I don't think it's a stretch or in any way to controversial to call the character Napoleon Dynamite a compuslive liar. Here's one of many reviews of the film that describe the character using the term. [1]. I reverted your revert of my edit, but I am certainly willing to discuss the issue further with you.-- The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 11:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
|
|
|
Your entire signature appears to link to your Esperanza subpage. Is that intentional? The text of that page suggests that you just meant to link the "e". Zetawoof( ζ) 02:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ansell. Have you ever thought of this? User:Blnguyen/RfA. Regards, Blnguyen | rant-line 07:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I deliberately kept the text of the performer's name out of the visible text; it wasn't a mixtake on my part. Is this proper, or do you think the current version is better? - Richardcavell 00:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
My edit summary was based on a misreading; I stand by the revert, though. The point (that Wikipedia has minimal notability standards) stands, though.
I would be open to other suggestions for wording and linkage, though. Thanks, Luc "Somethingorother" French 01:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
C'mon, man. Did you even read the article? The alleged "Lord" is the child of Anastasia Romanov (see link). His uncle VanLoone produces zero Ghits, and his uncle's ship the HMS Puma was scrapped in 1976. The article is a mishmash of Horatio Nelson and Aberdeen. This isn't just a hoax, this is patent nonsense. VoiceOfReason 04:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. The page now has sources at the bottom. --Kiran90 10:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC) (PS. Stop saying G'Day!! hehehe)
Wait, sorry, i think i got a bit of info mixed up. I'll verify it and put it back in. And yeh, fair enough about the g;day thing, i just never say it :S and yes, i am aussie. Brissie Aussie. --Kiran90 10:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
K, its all done, but im a bit iffy about how to reference them. Can you give me a few pointers? --Kiran90 10:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
No worries. I'd guess you opened just after I'd made the edit - these things happen sometimes! JPD ( talk) 11:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
That article is so crazy right now that it's confusing even for admins like me. Since his death, that article has seen 600 edits. "Insane" is a mild term for it. And as dawn hits in the US, it's going to get worse. -- Woohookitty (meow) 11:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, in response to the message that you sent me about my editing of the article on "Stingray", I was merely removing uncouth sentences like "The number of Steve Irwins has tripled" and "I suck mt bum" which was added by a troublemaker. This was not an experiment, and I hope you could enlighten me on your comment, as I am unable to fathom whether yours was supposed to be positive or negative. Thank you.
You keep beating me to reverts! Viridae Talk 02:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about losing your the comment in the shuffle! I was about to reinsert it, but you beat me to it. :-) —
David Levy
05:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
I reverted your edit because it did not happen on 6 September, and I felt the previous version of the article was sufficient. -- Zimbabweed 06:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Although I support the removal of unreferenced material - WP:LIVING doesn't apply... [2]. 09:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Viridae ( talk • contribs) .
Doh! How is it possible to edit an article ten times, to have him all over the press, radio, and TV, and still get his name wrong? Ta for the edit. Mr Stephen 12:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
You commented on a user page with the wrong link, keeping regionalisms for regional pages is referenced here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English not the generic wp:spelling page. Just for future reference (they probably moved it since last time, knowing how crappy the style and rule pages are set up). Zotel - the Stub Maker 13:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, Ansell, for your support and comments at my RfA, which finished with a tally of 94/1/0. I hope I live up to the confidence you have shown in me in my activities as an administrator. JPD ( talk) 16:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)