![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The reason that i removed the william miller photo poster by User:Pastorrussell was that its fair use tag was rather questionable (look at it and you'll see what i mean). Regards. MyNam e IsNotBob 09:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed your edit summary at Outback with Jack: Bush Remedies. The {{ afd1}} template is built to create a "hidden" section. If you feel this is unneeded, please bring it up on its talk page. -- KJ 09:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
When you add the <ref> tags in to poorly referenced statements, could you also add the Template:Cite_web tag as well? Would just save me (or someone else for that matter) having to go through and complete the task. Thanks, and happy editing - keep up the persistent work at Criticism of the Seventh-day Adventist Church! -- MyNam e IsNotBob 03:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Four times over the one page is a bit much and is a bit of a nuisance. Ans e ll 06:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Do you per chance have the book Meaning for the New Millenium: Christian Faith from an Adventist Perspective"? It may prove a useful aid in referencing the Seventh-day Adventist Church page. It is one of my brothers college textbooks, but I was just thinking it would help if you had a text or two. MyNam e IsNotBob 07:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Hopefully this will interest you. Cheers! -- Paleorthid 06:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I must have missed that. I shouldn't have been deleting articles that late -- my judgment is bound to be skewed. Thanks for the tip! Ian Manka Talk to me! 19:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove parts from the AfD tag. -- 9 cds (talk) 23:52, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! -- 9 cds (talk) 11:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, There's a discussion going on at Talk:Firefox about the Firefox redirect page and the Firefox (disambiguation) page. If you'd like to join in the discussion, feel free to do so -- H2g2bob 00:02, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ansell, I agree that 9cds has violated 3RR. However, as blocks are not meant as punishment but as prevention for this thing happening in the future, I believe that a block, at this point, might not be the best measure at this point, especially as another user has tried to start a mediation case with this user, which wouldn't really work if she were blocked. I've talked to her about it (on IRC) and I believe she acted out of both frustration over something else and ignorance of the reasoning behind your edits. I'm willing to monitor her for a few days, rather than blocking her, and talk her reverts through with her. Would that be an acceptable solution to you? I realise that she should not feel that she is immune to blocks and I will assure her that she's 'on probation'. -- Joanne B 12:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
refrain from using personal attack on Wikipedia or you will be banned, see WP:NPA 70.48.250.17 10:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Can you have a look at this article, I really don't know what should be done. Is it AfD material? Can we do anything to make it worthwhile? MyNam e IsNotBob 09:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, — Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Please see the bottom of Talk:Josip Šimunić. -- Joy [shallot] 13:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I can't speak for those who originally created the discussion, but please note that the discussion is advertised in an infobox on the top of Template talk:Bibleref, in an infobox on Template:Bibleref, on the TFD, and on the talk pages of everyone or substantially everyone who participated in the TFD [2]. Please remember to assume good faith - I doubt there was any intent to exclude anyone. BigDT 14:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The reason that i removed the william miller photo poster by User:Pastorrussell was that its fair use tag was rather questionable (look at it and you'll see what i mean). Regards. MyNam e IsNotBob 09:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed your edit summary at Outback with Jack: Bush Remedies. The {{ afd1}} template is built to create a "hidden" section. If you feel this is unneeded, please bring it up on its talk page. -- KJ 09:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
When you add the <ref> tags in to poorly referenced statements, could you also add the Template:Cite_web tag as well? Would just save me (or someone else for that matter) having to go through and complete the task. Thanks, and happy editing - keep up the persistent work at Criticism of the Seventh-day Adventist Church! -- MyNam e IsNotBob 03:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Four times over the one page is a bit much and is a bit of a nuisance. Ans e ll 06:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Do you per chance have the book Meaning for the New Millenium: Christian Faith from an Adventist Perspective"? It may prove a useful aid in referencing the Seventh-day Adventist Church page. It is one of my brothers college textbooks, but I was just thinking it would help if you had a text or two. MyNam e IsNotBob 07:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Hopefully this will interest you. Cheers! -- Paleorthid 06:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I must have missed that. I shouldn't have been deleting articles that late -- my judgment is bound to be skewed. Thanks for the tip! Ian Manka Talk to me! 19:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove parts from the AfD tag. -- 9 cds (talk) 23:52, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! -- 9 cds (talk) 11:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, There's a discussion going on at Talk:Firefox about the Firefox redirect page and the Firefox (disambiguation) page. If you'd like to join in the discussion, feel free to do so -- H2g2bob 00:02, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ansell, I agree that 9cds has violated 3RR. However, as blocks are not meant as punishment but as prevention for this thing happening in the future, I believe that a block, at this point, might not be the best measure at this point, especially as another user has tried to start a mediation case with this user, which wouldn't really work if she were blocked. I've talked to her about it (on IRC) and I believe she acted out of both frustration over something else and ignorance of the reasoning behind your edits. I'm willing to monitor her for a few days, rather than blocking her, and talk her reverts through with her. Would that be an acceptable solution to you? I realise that she should not feel that she is immune to blocks and I will assure her that she's 'on probation'. -- Joanne B 12:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
refrain from using personal attack on Wikipedia or you will be banned, see WP:NPA 70.48.250.17 10:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Can you have a look at this article, I really don't know what should be done. Is it AfD material? Can we do anything to make it worthwhile? MyNam e IsNotBob 09:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, — Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Please see the bottom of Talk:Josip Šimunić. -- Joy [shallot] 13:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I can't speak for those who originally created the discussion, but please note that the discussion is advertised in an infobox on the top of Template talk:Bibleref, in an infobox on Template:Bibleref, on the TFD, and on the talk pages of everyone or substantially everyone who participated in the TFD [2]. Please remember to assume good faith - I doubt there was any intent to exclude anyone. BigDT 14:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)