Hello, AnotherPseudonym, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
I undid your “reworking” (but the only grammar change). Feel free to discuss restoration of its less controversial pieces at talk: Material conditional. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 07:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi AnotherPseudonym! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding possible Carl Hewitt sanctions violation. The thread is User:AnotherPseudonym and Carl Hewitt. Thank you. —— Arthur Rubin (talk) 13:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello AnotherPseudonym!
I revisited the NLP article today. This had me giggle-lol'ing:
The only variation missing was "Slurp"! I also noticed that the debate was raging, once again. I chided a little, mentioned martingales and thrashing, and came to visit your talk page. I was saddened when I saw your summoning to the Administrator's Tribunal. The upshot seems to have been to allow you to remain. I hope so!
I read C. Hewitt's biography article. I wish I were C.H., PhD too! It is a shame that he has such an awful past history here on WP. I don't think he's being unfairly treated, as I did a search on his last name on the Admin board archives. One quick glance at the first 20 entries returned was sufficient. Still, though, it is sad. He was a key, or maybe lead, designer/creator of Prolog. He's doing fun stuff even now that's he's emeritus, specifically, work on what seems to be homomorphic encryption. If you WERE he, Carl Hewitt, it would be rather impressive, as you are extremely conversant with NLP concepts (a very different field), and with legitimate behavioral psychology and possibly psychiatry. You also write very fluently, and are extremely patient, all of which would be unusual, if you were a distinguished, no-longer-young yet still-active, former professor of Electrical Engineering at MIT!
Wikipedia is remarkable. It is stuffed to the gills with awfulness and cronyism and outrageous behavior, but in other areas, seems to bring out the very best in people. I don't believe in the crowd-sourcing, knowledge is free, wisdom of the cloud thing; it ultimately seems to be fueled by the hard work of unpaid people who are poor, energetic, bright, have internet access but not much else. Nevertheless, Wikipedia and even more so, StackExchange are the only instances of it really working as described. Sorry, I should also include MSDN (Microsoft Developer Network) and forums. They're good too, but some of those people are paid, I presume, hope. I wish we were paid too!
Okay, I'll wander off now. I think I should stay away from the NLP article. It will only lead to heartache. You've made a fine effort, I just wanted to tell you that. I want to give you one of my personalized barnstar-substitutes, but I don't have enough insight about you to do that. Maybe in due course of time. See you later, Alligator!
P.S. If this is too lengthy-indiscreet-embarrassing, feel free to blank it after reading.
;o)
-- FeralOink ( talk) 23:37, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
This diff alone breaches 3 WP policies that I know of. I thought we were making progress. Can you please rein it in? WykiP ( talk) 19:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, calm yourself, no need to argue anymore. We can just take the case to WP:RfC. Don't give him anymore excuses to nail you for being uncivil. Ki Chjang ( talk) 15:24, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Agreed, I would redact the 'hypocrite' paragraph. And no need for an RfC there is no consensus for change, just leave them with brief responses ---- Snowded TALK 05:05, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
I think the article is spot on. Ahale ( talk) 22:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Szasz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Psychogenic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/kansascity/obituary.aspx?pid=165884706#sthash.XOoldjBG.dpbs Doesn't mention that we've moved Dad into an Alzheimer's care facility, or that we closed up their home. Two months tomorrow. I still have not even gotten around to reading what you posted, and now probably never will. That's what you wanted, right? htom ( talk) 04:47, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deconstruction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phenomenology ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
See talk page and respond. Thanks. 24.253.64.178 ( talk) 06:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
24.253.64.178 ( talk) 06:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, AnotherPseudonym. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, AnotherPseudonym, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
I undid your “reworking” (but the only grammar change). Feel free to discuss restoration of its less controversial pieces at talk: Material conditional. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 07:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi AnotherPseudonym! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding possible Carl Hewitt sanctions violation. The thread is User:AnotherPseudonym and Carl Hewitt. Thank you. —— Arthur Rubin (talk) 13:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello AnotherPseudonym!
I revisited the NLP article today. This had me giggle-lol'ing:
The only variation missing was "Slurp"! I also noticed that the debate was raging, once again. I chided a little, mentioned martingales and thrashing, and came to visit your talk page. I was saddened when I saw your summoning to the Administrator's Tribunal. The upshot seems to have been to allow you to remain. I hope so!
I read C. Hewitt's biography article. I wish I were C.H., PhD too! It is a shame that he has such an awful past history here on WP. I don't think he's being unfairly treated, as I did a search on his last name on the Admin board archives. One quick glance at the first 20 entries returned was sufficient. Still, though, it is sad. He was a key, or maybe lead, designer/creator of Prolog. He's doing fun stuff even now that's he's emeritus, specifically, work on what seems to be homomorphic encryption. If you WERE he, Carl Hewitt, it would be rather impressive, as you are extremely conversant with NLP concepts (a very different field), and with legitimate behavioral psychology and possibly psychiatry. You also write very fluently, and are extremely patient, all of which would be unusual, if you were a distinguished, no-longer-young yet still-active, former professor of Electrical Engineering at MIT!
Wikipedia is remarkable. It is stuffed to the gills with awfulness and cronyism and outrageous behavior, but in other areas, seems to bring out the very best in people. I don't believe in the crowd-sourcing, knowledge is free, wisdom of the cloud thing; it ultimately seems to be fueled by the hard work of unpaid people who are poor, energetic, bright, have internet access but not much else. Nevertheless, Wikipedia and even more so, StackExchange are the only instances of it really working as described. Sorry, I should also include MSDN (Microsoft Developer Network) and forums. They're good too, but some of those people are paid, I presume, hope. I wish we were paid too!
Okay, I'll wander off now. I think I should stay away from the NLP article. It will only lead to heartache. You've made a fine effort, I just wanted to tell you that. I want to give you one of my personalized barnstar-substitutes, but I don't have enough insight about you to do that. Maybe in due course of time. See you later, Alligator!
P.S. If this is too lengthy-indiscreet-embarrassing, feel free to blank it after reading.
;o)
-- FeralOink ( talk) 23:37, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
This diff alone breaches 3 WP policies that I know of. I thought we were making progress. Can you please rein it in? WykiP ( talk) 19:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, calm yourself, no need to argue anymore. We can just take the case to WP:RfC. Don't give him anymore excuses to nail you for being uncivil. Ki Chjang ( talk) 15:24, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Agreed, I would redact the 'hypocrite' paragraph. And no need for an RfC there is no consensus for change, just leave them with brief responses ---- Snowded TALK 05:05, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
I think the article is spot on. Ahale ( talk) 22:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Szasz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Psychogenic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/kansascity/obituary.aspx?pid=165884706#sthash.XOoldjBG.dpbs Doesn't mention that we've moved Dad into an Alzheimer's care facility, or that we closed up their home. Two months tomorrow. I still have not even gotten around to reading what you posted, and now probably never will. That's what you wanted, right? htom ( talk) 04:47, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deconstruction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phenomenology ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
See talk page and respond. Thanks. 24.253.64.178 ( talk) 06:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
24.253.64.178 ( talk) 06:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, AnotherPseudonym. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)