This is AnotherEditor144's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
|
![]() | AnotherEditor144 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon. |
Articles for improvement can be submitted here. WikiProject messages can be found here. News can be found here.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello. I've noticed your comments here. To be frank, I think you're giving bad advice there. Checkusers will not ever run checks on IPs due to an SPI and encouraging a user to request CU in this case is a bad idea. Excessively pinging checkusers is also not necessary – if checks are needed, a clerk will endorse and a CU will have a look as soon as they find time. I also want to note that letter codes for CU requests haven't been in use for a long, long time.
You created your account yesterday; I think it may be a little too early for you to comment on SPIs. I suggest focusing on mainspace edits until you have gained more experience. Best, Blablubbs| talk 19:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--
Govvy (
talk)
00:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi AnotherEditor144! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
The chances of you being a new editor and also somehow writing all of this and making a bunch of edits to SPI are almost nothing, so I've blocked you. If you want to be unblocked, please appeal your previous ban/block through your main account. Moneytrees🏝️ Talk/ CCI help 05:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
AnotherEditor144 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I think I am ready to come back in good faith. AnotherEditor144 talk contribs 10:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please request unblock from your original account or otherwise address the reason for the block. 331dot ( talk) 11:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AnotherEditor144 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My intricate knowledge of the Wikipedia facts and obscure areas that 331dot mentioned was from my time as an anonymous user (no editing, just watching. In other words, I was interested in Wikipedia and was preparing to edit during those years. -- AnotherEditor144 talk contribs 15:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 14:19, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is AnotherEditor144's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
|
![]() | AnotherEditor144 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon. |
Articles for improvement can be submitted here. WikiProject messages can be found here. News can be found here.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello. I've noticed your comments here. To be frank, I think you're giving bad advice there. Checkusers will not ever run checks on IPs due to an SPI and encouraging a user to request CU in this case is a bad idea. Excessively pinging checkusers is also not necessary – if checks are needed, a clerk will endorse and a CU will have a look as soon as they find time. I also want to note that letter codes for CU requests haven't been in use for a long, long time.
You created your account yesterday; I think it may be a little too early for you to comment on SPIs. I suggest focusing on mainspace edits until you have gained more experience. Best, Blablubbs| talk 19:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--
Govvy (
talk)
00:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi AnotherEditor144! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
The chances of you being a new editor and also somehow writing all of this and making a bunch of edits to SPI are almost nothing, so I've blocked you. If you want to be unblocked, please appeal your previous ban/block through your main account. Moneytrees🏝️ Talk/ CCI help 05:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
AnotherEditor144 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I think I am ready to come back in good faith. AnotherEditor144 talk contribs 10:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please request unblock from your original account or otherwise address the reason for the block. 331dot ( talk) 11:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AnotherEditor144 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My intricate knowledge of the Wikipedia facts and obscure areas that 331dot mentioned was from my time as an anonymous user (no editing, just watching. In other words, I was interested in Wikipedia and was preparing to edit during those years. -- AnotherEditor144 talk contribs 15:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 14:19, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.