Hello Aniem045,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Richard Sokoloski for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jodamaster ( talk) 22:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.
Jodamaster (
talk)
23:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Aniem045,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Richard Sokoloski for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jodamaster ( talk) 00:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Aniem045,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Richard Sokoloski should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Sokoloski .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, Jodamaster ( talk) 00:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Aniem045. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 16:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Aniem045,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Richard Sokoloski for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jodamaster ( talk) 22:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.
Jodamaster (
talk)
23:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Aniem045,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Richard Sokoloski for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jodamaster ( talk) 00:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Aniem045,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Richard Sokoloski should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Sokoloski .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, Jodamaster ( talk) 00:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Aniem045. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 16:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)